Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Can't a different judge approve it then?

FanofSMBX wrote:Can't a different judge approve it then?

That's what we do lol

Well, when you put it that way it makes sense, but the wording is awkward. It also implies that if a judge is biased, he/she will/won't approve a review because his/her opinion is different.

That just allows for judges to justify not making a good review because "I have a different opinion"

KoolKat wrote:Well, when you put it that way it makes sense, but the wording is awkward. It also implies that if a judge is biased, he/she will/won't approve a review because his/her opinion is different.

That just allows for judges to justify not making a good review because "I have a different opinion"

Well I'm sorry for the misunderstanding then.

Honestly, I'd have it worded so that judges can't disapprove a review because they have a slightly different opinion.

Example:

user wrote: -insert really good review-
except that the grass is too desaturated, it looks almost gray!
-insert really good review-

judge wrote: Sorry, but the grass isn't supposed to be saturated, I'm not approving this review.

KoolKat wrote:Honestly, I'd have it worded so that judges can't disapprove a review because they have a slightly different opinion.

Example:

user wrote: -insert really good review-
except that the grass is too desaturated, it looks almost gray!
-insert really good review-

judge wrote: Sorry, but the grass isn't supposed to be saturated, I'm not approving this review.

if the judge(s) has a slightly different opinion we don't reject it. We'll only focus on major dissagreements.

Ah, I see.

zlakerboy357 wrote:http://www.smbxgame.com/forums/v ... =32&t=4677

Wait does this mean I don't have to only just be at smf and do reviews??? YAY I think I will start. Also 400th post

zlakerboy357 wrote:

KoolKat wrote:Honestly, I'd have it worded so that judges can't disapprove a review because they have a slightly different opinion.

Example:

user wrote: -insert really good review-
except that the grass is too desaturated, it looks almost gray!
-insert really good review-

judge wrote: Sorry, but the grass isn't supposed to be saturated, I'm not approving this review.

if the judge(s) has a slightly different opinion we don't reject it. We'll only focus on major dissagreements.

Koolkat, I think it's going to be like smf a bit. Except without the scroll lists. Also... I don't think beyond is going to be like that. http://www.smbxgame.com/forums/v ... =32&t=4541

Please don't indirectly insult one of the LJs. He was implying you needed to elaborate more on your review and the rules do state (if they don't, I'll add it to that thread right now) that the Level Judges do approve and disapprove certain reviews depending on the length and quality of the level. You should have a decent sized paragraph (around 4-6 sentences in each of your judging categories) thoroughly explaining the pros and cons of the levels.

We will be strict at first to try and get through into the motion of the change to the system.

TNTtimelord wrote:Please don't indirectly insult one of the LJs. He was implying you needed to elaborate more on your review and the rules do state (if they don't, I'll add it to that thread right now) that the Level Judges do approve and disapprove certain reviews depending on the length and quality of the level. You should have a decent sized paragraph (around 4-6 sentences in each of your judging categories) thoroughly explaining the pros and cons of the levels.

We will be strict at first to try and get through into the motion of the change to the system.

Oops. If you're talking to me Sorry . It was getting kinda annoying, but I think my review got ok.