Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Raster wrote:

lighthouse64 wrote:the trash can should be changed to needs improvement. It is a nicer name ☺

Levels in Pretty Good and even The Best need improvement.

They could always be called not very good levels. It is better than my other name.

No, if you're even going to think about calling it not very good levels, you might as well just call it the trashcan, because levels in the trashcan should have no effort and be plain awful, and a level judge is too strict if he put a level in the trashcan because it has "poor design" or "excessive clash" because that's not why the trashcan is there.

Kep wrote:No, if you're even going to think about calling it not very good levels, you might as well just call it the trashcan, because levels in the trashcan should have no effort and be plain awful, and a level judge is too strict if he put a level in the trashcan because it has "poor design" or "excessive clash" because that's not why the trashcan is there.

Well if it has excessive clash it might still be fun. They could put a message saying play this at your own risk.

lighthouse64 wrote:

Kep wrote:No, if you're even going to think about calling it not very good levels, you might as well just call it the trashcan, because levels in the trashcan should have no effort and be plain awful, and a level judge is too strict if he put a level in the trashcan because it has "poor design" or "excessive clash" because that's not why the trashcan is there.

Well if it has excessive clash it might still be fun. They could put a message saying play this at your own risk.

Yeah, but unless it's a joke level suiting someone's humor, levels in the trashcan shouldn't be "fun".

Well the smf community calls the bad levels spam. that might work maybe???

^
Eh, "spam" pretty much has the same connotation overall as "The Trash Can" to me. I don't think that's the kind of name change people are looking for, though I'd disagree that the name needs to be changed at all (since most of the levels there are joke levels/nigh-unplayable).

Pseudo-dino wrote:^
Eh, "spam" pretty much has the same connotation overall as "The Trash Can" to me. I don't think that's the kind of name change people are looking for, though I'd disagree that the name needs to be changed at all (since most of the levels there are joke levels/nigh-unplayable).

Ok ur right about the name. Well Now I'm just wondering if anyone would let us judge levels sorta like smf. I mean some people here already do that in posts.

I'd like to know why the name "Trash can" should be changed. Guys, this isn't even a swear word.

Christian07 wrote:I'd like to know why the name "Trash can" should be changed. Guys, this isn't even a swear word.

Well it seems ok actually unless someone wants it to be called bad levels.

I think smf is cool. I wish us non- level judges could rate levels... Also yes yes even though there are more active level judges it would still be more convenient.

9pipbubbles wrote:I think smf is cool. I wish us non- level judges could rate levels... Also yes yes even though there are more active level judges it would still be more convenient.

No where does it say that regular users can't rate levels.

I think he's trying to state that he wants it to be offical.

9pipbubbles wrote:I think smf is cool. I wish us non- level judges could rate levels... Also yes yes even though there are more active level judges it would still be more convenient.

I don't think you noticed how the new level judge team cleared out an entire page within a day.

Also, I do plan on trying to bring up to Joey about adding some sort of approval system where the judges can allow an regular user's review to count as if it was by a level judge.

In other words, I may be proposing a system where any user's review counts.

TNTtimelord wrote:

9pipbubbles wrote:I think smf is cool. I wish us non- level judges could rate levels... Also yes yes even though there are more active level judges it would still be more convenient.

I don't think you noticed how the new level judge team cleared out an entire page within a day.

Also, I do plan on trying to bring up to Joey about adding some sort of approval system where the judges can allow an regular user's review to count as if it was by a level judge.

In other words, I may be proposing a system where any user's review counts.

THX And I'm glad that they are doing it faster too

Well... I guess we just wait now for the thing to happen.

That actually isn't a bad idea. Levels would be moved a hell of a lot faster.

Maruiki wrote:That actually isn't a bad idea. Levels would be moved a hell of a lot faster.

True, and we could really use some help.

"The review must have the same opinions as the Level Judge approving the review"

Basically, you want every user to have the same opinions? Some users care about every little detail, while others only care about the bigger things, some users have different opinions from each other! That rule reeks of BS.

KoolKat wrote:"The review must have the same opinions as the Level Judge approving the review"

Basically, you want every user to have the same opinions? Some users care about every little detail, while others only care about the bigger things, some users have different opinions from each other! That rule reeks of BS.

Reviews are opinions so what's the point of approving something you don't agree with :/