Site Discussion Thread

For topics related to SuperMarioBrosX.org. Suggest anything that you would like to see on the site here.

Moderator: Userbase Moderators

XerX
Phanto
Phanto
Posts: 1487
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:33 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby XerX » Sun Nov 09, 2014 4:28 pm

krazykat wrote:Make it monthly. Problem solved.
It was monthly.

zioy
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:47 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby zioy » Sun Nov 09, 2014 4:29 pm

XerX wrote:
krazykat wrote:Make it monthly. Problem solved.
It was monthly.
Well it was weekly when I was there iirc

Fuyu
Fry Guy
Fry Guy
Posts: 3137
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:40 pm
Pronouns: He/Him

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Fuyu » Mon Nov 10, 2014 7:33 am

I don't agree with the implementation of such feature, but I don't think that scrapping the idea is good either. Since finding people that are dedicated enough to work on it and there's the fact that not always will there be any news worth mentioning on a day/month basis what could work is a Scripting Log. People would write normal scripts, being as biased as possible of course, about many things that take place or are posted in the community. It sort of works like a News System but at the same time it's kinda different. Instead of requiring people to write daily/monthly scripts people would do it whenever they like to and would remain archived somewhere in the forums. Said scripts could denote many things such as: episode reviews, recent events, announcements from users (would require proof and promise from author to fulfil such announcement), etcetera.

FanofSMBX
Ludwig von Koopa
Ludwig von Koopa
Posts: 3878
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:01 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby FanofSMBX » Sat Nov 22, 2014 10:19 am

http://www.smbxgame.com/forums/v ... 5&start=10
(And another topic by fireflowerhour)
Joey has twice already locked topics when he doesn't feel like talking about how official these forums are, instead of saying "I quit" and leaving the topic.

Mable
Luigi
Luigi
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Mable » Sat Nov 22, 2014 2:44 pm

FanofSMBX wrote:http://www.smbxgame.com/forums/v ... 5&start=10
(And another topic by fireflowerhour)
Joey has twice already locked topics when he doesn't feel like talking about how official these forums are, instead of saying "I quit" and leaving the topic.
"How official these forums are"

These forums are not official though. There was only 1 official one which was the one by Redigit the new ones that followed were never official. Joey's forum imo isn't official as well and nothing here will be official.

Why do we even need the so called Official stuff. When Knux called his forum official it only leaded into a storm of flames and shit.

So in short words: No smbx forum (Joey's, Knux's, NSMBX) are official and never will be official there was only 1 which was Redigit's forum. The End. Deal with that.

I'm fairly sure Joey knows by himself that his forum isn't official. And i understand why he locks those threads.

Shadow Yoshi
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
Posts: 4291
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:56 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Shadow Yoshi » Sat Nov 22, 2014 10:19 pm

Why would I say "I quit"?
CaptainSyrup wrote:There was only 1 official one which was the one by Redigit the new ones that followed were never official. Joey's forum imo isn't official as well and nothing here will be official.
False. bikcmp's forum and TrekWeb were both official forums. This forum is official because it's the one that everybody recognizes as the SMBX forums. We don't have a name - we're just the Super Mario Bros. X forums, centered around the Super Mario Bros. X game.
CaptainSyrup wrote:Why do we even need the so called Official stuff. When Knux called his forum official it only leaded into a storm of flames and shit.
If I remember correctly, Knux called his forum "official" because he was mistaken about something Redigit said in 2010.

I don't go around calling this place "the official SMBX forums official official official knux sux" because nobody needs to do that. This place is, quite simply, the SMBX forums.

FanofSMBX
Ludwig von Koopa
Ludwig von Koopa
Posts: 3878
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:01 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby FanofSMBX » Sat Nov 22, 2014 10:23 pm

I meant "I quit the discussion".

LM280
Monty Mole
Monty Mole
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:10 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby LM280 » Thu Nov 27, 2014 10:17 pm

Adding a "Boss Fight Levels" Subforum in Levels.
Changing "Worlds" to "Episodes" on the main site.

Mable
Luigi
Luigi
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Mable » Sat Nov 29, 2014 11:21 am

Boss Fight levels should just go into Casual Levels imo.

zioy
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:47 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby zioy » Sat Nov 29, 2014 11:26 am

CaptainSyrup wrote:Boss Fight levels should just go into Casual Levels imo.
No. Boss fights take effort. People want criticism on boss fights. Putting them in casual is an insult.

Choco
Eerie
Eerie
Posts: 735
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:48 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Choco » Sat Nov 29, 2014 5:16 pm

Not all of them do. Most of them are just vanilla bosses thrown into a death box with the player. But a subforum would be nice, so we can filter them away from the good levels. (They're not all bad)

Imaynotbehere4long
Boomerang Bro
Boomerang Bro
Posts: 1389
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:00 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Imaynotbehere4long » Sat Nov 29, 2014 9:40 pm

I disagree that there should be a separate sub-forum for boss levels. As a judge, I know that we can just judge them for what they are and likewise separate the ones that took effort from the ones that are just a vanilla boss thrown into a death box with the player. As for being able to tell standard levels apart from boss levels, well, that's what their titles (and their first posts) are for!

SilverDeoxys563
Guest

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby SilverDeoxys563 » Sat Nov 29, 2014 10:28 pm

Imaynotbehere4long wrote:I disagree that there should be a separate sub-forum for boss levels. As a judge, I know that we can just judge them for what they are and likewise separate the ones that took effort from the ones that are just a vanilla boss thrown into a death box with the player. As for being able to tell standard levels apart from boss levels, well, that's what their titles (and their first posts) are for!
Speaking of levels subforums, why not add one for intro levels? I think you learned the truth about the identity of the author of the one you were using a few weeks ago as you stated in that one thread, and I'd like to release an updated version of it.

Mable
Luigi
Luigi
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Mable » Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:04 pm

Just a kindly question. I still don't get why Platgenwohl is not stickied yet Superiorstar's Shop is stickied. That means the staff supports his thread or? Bc i remember Joey said things the staff supports get the sticky.

Incoming hate from certain members.

zioy
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:47 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby zioy » Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:12 pm

The site name and site description are redundant (Super Mario Bros X Forums) (Forums for SMBX)
Why not something like "Super Mario Bros X Forums" "Welcome to the SMBX community!"?

FanofSMBX
Ludwig von Koopa
Ludwig von Koopa
Posts: 3878
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:01 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby FanofSMBX » Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:17 pm

Isn't that redundant too lol? "The SMBX forums" is the SMBX community what a novel idea

Shadow Yoshi
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
Posts: 4291
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:56 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Shadow Yoshi » Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:18 pm

That's the way they've been on previous forums, not to mention it's on a style that isn't the default.

zioy
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:47 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby zioy » Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:20 pm

I have something in common with Kyasarin: we both prefer subsilver over the default style.

Imaynotbehere4long
Boomerang Bro
Boomerang Bro
Posts: 1389
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:00 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Imaynotbehere4long » Sun Nov 30, 2014 2:33 pm

SilverDeoxys563 wrote:
Imaynotbehere4long wrote:I disagree that there should be a separate sub-forum for boss levels. As a judge, I know that we can just judge them for what they are and likewise separate the ones that took effort from the ones that are just a vanilla boss thrown into a death box with the player. As for being able to tell standard levels apart from boss levels, well, that's what their titles (and their first posts) are for!
Speaking of levels subforums, why not add one for intro levels? I think you learned the truth about the identity of the author of the one you were using a few weeks ago as you stated in that one thread, and I'd like to release an updated version of it.
You'll need to ask an admin about that. I'm only a level judge, so I can't create new sub-forums (at least, if I can, I don't know how).

I do support this idea, however.

Knux
Foo
Foo
Posts: 831
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2014 10:55 pm
Pronouns: she/they

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Knux » Sun Nov 30, 2014 5:28 pm

Can't find an IRC related thread, but something needs to be done about Ghostbot. 24 hour k-lines because it detects fast typing as spam is ridiculous.

I understand why it does that, but it's very easy to forget sometimes, and nobody bothers to remove the k-lines.


Return to “SuperMarioBrosX.org”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari