Level Contest 9: The Autumn Contest

Arale · Postby **Arale** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:17 am

CaptainSyrup wrote:
Darkonius Mavakar wrote:talkhaus they said they won't join because LunaDLL isn't allowed, that's it.
Sry but thats the most idiotic reason i ever heard just bc they like to stick their LunaDLL stuff in everyones ass and they don't have any legitmate reasons either.

good points but i have a counterargument - your signature is literally the size of a building

or more directly, being insulting isnt going to make your 'criticisms' very respected

anyway im from the talkhaus and i joined so idk why talkhaus is now a singular hivemind entity. funny how people like to jump to giving groups a singular opinion.

e: oh valtteri already made that point, i should read

Mable · Postby **Mable** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:26 am

Nobody forces you to read our signatures so thats not valid at all.

kk the deadline is soon i expect a lot of rushed levels again.

Arale · Postby **Arale** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:28 am

CaptainSyrup wrote:Nobody forces you to read our signatures so thats not valid at all.

kk the deadline is soon i expect a lot of rushed levels again.

oh yeah i forgot that if you don't meticulously read a signature, then it doesnt exist and you dont have to scroll for seven hours

Darkonius Mavakar · Postby **Darkonius Mavakar** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:34 am

Arale wrote:
CaptainSyrup wrote:Nobody forces you to read our signatures so thats not valid at all.

kk the deadline is soon i expect a lot of rushed levels again.
oh yeah i forgot that if you don't meticulously read a signature, then it doesnt exist and you dont have to scroll for seven hours

why are we arguing about signatures again?
who gives you the rights to bitch about other peoples' stuff?
why do you care about signatures?
you may not like them but here in this forum it's a normal thing that doesn't bother us.
we shouldn't change our stuff, for example signatures, because YOU don't like it.
it's not like we're bitching about your signatures.
that's how signatures work HERE.

Arale · Postby **Arale** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:43 am

uh, look yo bucket, i didnt really intend to derail the thread, but i dont want to seem like i cant respond to your points, so im gonna answer u in a spoiler

Spoiler: show

on-topic discussion: haha, level contests! levels and contests. i can't wait to play the contest! (legit talk im gonna try to play this ToB ive never actually played one before so i hope its fun)

HeroLinik · Postby **HeroLinik** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:45 am

Yeah right, let's get back on topic.

Are you guys ready for the unveiling of the results? Who do you think has submitted the joke levels?

Arale · Postby **Arale** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:47 am

i have my suspIcions

HeroLinik · Postby **HeroLinik** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:49 am

I have a feeling that the lineup will be like that of CC7 due to the amount of new users signing up, a few of them from the Talkhaus. But then we could get a person who makes it into the top 10 and it's their first level in their time in the SMBX community, or even their first ever contest level.

Darkonius Mavakar · Postby **Darkonius Mavakar** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:58 am

castlewars wrote:I have a feeling that the lineup will be like that of CC7 due to the amount of new users signing up, a few of them from the Talkhaus. But then we could get a person who makes it into the top 10 and it's their first level in their time in the SMBX community, or even their first ever contest level.

Willhart will make to the top 10 imo, i like his levels.

Keddy · Postby **Keddy** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:14 am

What? You know the judges are usually in the top 10, top 20 if it's a big one.

HeroLinik · Postby **HeroLinik** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 7:35 am

elitalianoverde wrote:What? You know the judges are usually in the top 10, top 20 if it's a big one.

That's because they give biased scores just to make their levels place in the higher tiers. Emral is a classic example of a biased judge whose only intent was to win.

RudeGuy · Postby **RudeGuy** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 7:43 am

Long posts are cool

castlewars wrote:Are you guys ready for the unveiling of the results?

First results will be posted in the 27th of october, if I'm right.

castlewars wrote:Who do you think has submitted the joke levels?

Arale/leet and another person I don't remember.

castlewars wrote:I have a feeling that the lineup will be like that of CC7 due to the amount of new users signing up, a few of them from the Talkhaus. But then we could get a person who makes it into the top 10 and it's their first level in their time in the SMBX community, or even their first ever contest level.

It didn't ever happened apart in CC8. Lineup like CC7? Who knows.

castlewars wrote:
elitalianoverde wrote:What? You know the judges are usually in the top 10, top 20 if it's a big one.
That's because they give biased scores just to make their levels place in the higher tiers. Emral is a classic example of a biased judge whose only intent was to win.

Emral wasn't biased, he just put low scores.

By the way, only 34 on 89 have just submitted their level contest.

Bomber57 · Postby **Bomber57** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 8:06 am

castlewars wrote:Yeah right, let's get back on topic.

Are you guys ready for the unveiling of the results? Who do you think has submitted the joke levels?

Valtteri · Postby **Valtteri** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 8:08 am

castlewars wrote:
elitalianoverde wrote:What? You know the judges are usually in the top 10, top 20 if it's a big one.
That's because they give biased scores just to make their levels place in the higher tiers. Emral is a classic example of a biased judge whose only intent was to win.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

DatDude · Postby **DatDude** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 8:16 am

I wonder WHY IN THE WORLD have i not seen this.
Joining.

Postby **KBM-Quine** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:55 am

sounds good, i'm joining

zlaker · Postby **zlaker** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:59 am

castlewars wrote:
elitalianoverde wrote:What? You know the judges are usually in the top 10, top 20 if it's a big one.
That's because they give biased scores just to make their levels place in the higher tiers. Emral is a classic example of a biased judge whose only intent was to win.

Um no, you're a great example of a biased judge. Emral can at least see the difference between a joke level and a serious level.

Bomber57 · Postby **Bomber57** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:08 am

zlakerboy357 wrote:
castlewars wrote:
elitalianoverde wrote:What? You know the judges are usually in the top 10, top 20 if it's a big one.
That's because they give biased scores just to make their levels place in the higher tiers. Emral is a classic example of a biased judge whose only intent was to win.
Um no, you're a great example of a biased judge. Emral can at least see the difference between a joke level and a serious level.

Seriously castlewars, you listed Ace's level as a joke level when it obviously wasn't. One of your reasons was because, no seriously actually because "Toad does not curse in the Mario series."

Chip Potato · Postby **Chip Potato** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:33 am

castlewars wrote:
elitalianoverde wrote:What? You know the judges are usually in the top 10, top 20 if it's a big one.
That's because they give biased scores just to make their levels place in the higher tiers. Emral is a classic example of a biased judge whose only intent was to win.

Well... it is called the Tower of Biased, you know, so it kind of makes sense. Doesn't excuse it, mind you, but yeah.

Kyo · Postby **Kyo** » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:38 am

fireflowerhour wrote:
castlewars wrote:
elitalianoverde wrote:What? You know the judges are usually in the top 10, top 20 if it's a big one.
That's because they give biased scores just to make their levels place in the higher tiers. Emral is a classic example of a biased judge whose only intent was to win.
Well... it is called the Tower of Biased, you know, so it kind of makes sense. Doesn't excuse it, mind you, but yeah.

Are you aware that ToB's name is supposed to be sarcastic?