Site Discussion Thread

For topics related to SuperMarioBrosX.org. Suggest anything that you would like to see on the site here.

Moderator: Userbase Moderators

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4787
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby aero » Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:21 am

Joey wrote:In response to "wiki group", while I'd rather not make an actual usergroup on the forums yet, I'd be willing to promote some more wiki staff.
This sounds good too, whatever works really. The medals suggestion could also help with this too since there was discussion about wiki related medals.

FanofSMBX
Ludwig von Koopa
Ludwig von Koopa
Posts: 3878
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:01 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby FanofSMBX » Sun Aug 31, 2014 2:00 am

I saw this on talkhaus
"Also you guys should get an actual name or something because having to say "the SMBX community" to refer to you is dumb. How about SMBXhaus or SMBXCentral"
I don't agree with the tone but I agree with the message. "The SMBX conmunity" creates ambiguity not only in general but between this and the 2009 forums.

...and if I were to be honest I would say it sounds sorta hubristic for someone (Joey's the main example, but if Quill called this "SMBX community" on mfgg I would still be bothered) to claim that this is "the" forum. Not as in "the most popular SMBX forum" which would be true, but the idea that that popularity MAKES it "the SMBX forum"

Julia Pseudo
Luigi
Luigi
Posts: 5609
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 12:04 am
Flair: gay gaymer girl
Pronouns: She/her

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Julia Pseudo » Sun Aug 31, 2014 2:36 am

^
Eh as far as I know there are no other claimants to "The SMBX forum" title at this point - Super Mario Universe (reghrhre and CaptainSyrup's forum, for those of you who don't know) is a general Mario forum though it includes an SMBX section, and all of the other former competitors for the title, including Knuxforums, are closed and/or deleted at this point. Doesn't seem like a problem to me.

As for a site name though that seems like a fair enough point - I suppose we could use a name of some kind. SMBXCentral sounds pretty good to me but I feel like people would get us confused with SMWCentral, probably not the best. SMBXhaus is just silly but I think the guy who said it knew that.

I would support a more "legitimate" name for this forum though. Whoever said this made a lot of sense.

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4787
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby aero » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:12 am

FanofSMBX wrote:I saw this on talkhaus
"Also you guys should get an actual name or something because having to say "the SMBX community" to refer to you is dumb. How about SMBXhaus or SMBXCentral"
I don't agree with the tone but I agree with the message. "The SMBX conmunity" creates ambiguity not only in general but between this and the 2009 forums.

...and if I were to be honest I would say it sounds sorta hubristic for someone (Joey's the main example, but if Quill called this "SMBX community" on mfgg I would still be bothered) to claim that this is "the" forum. Not as in "the most popular SMBX forum" which would be true, but the idea that that popularity MAKES it "the SMBX forum"
Well if it counts the 2009 forum is usually called the SMB.org forum, Knux's forum was called Knuxforums, and this site has been called the SMBX.org forum. Each have their own name but generally people from "the community" call this "the community" if that makes sense.

Sevennights
Rex
Rex
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:52 pm
Flair: When's Mafia
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Sevennights » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:14 am

Well the things we need are medals of course, a wiki contributors group, gfx page updated, so more staff live game masters and administrators (not that many admins though, just like 3 more), more level desihners because there are a lot of level designers but not in a group, people to put a stop to joke levels, more mafia games, a gfx maker group, smbx updaters, and an option to be put on vacation. (Maybe, idk for the vaction.)

glitch4
Banned
Posts: 2577
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 3:43 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby glitch4 » Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:48 am

SMBXCentral could be called because of the Youtube channel:
Spoiler: show
Image

Mable
Luigi
Luigi
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Mable » Sun Aug 31, 2014 6:39 am

The only problem is that the Youtube Channel is ded like shit.

Fuyu
Fry Guy
Fry Guy
Posts: 3137
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:40 pm
Pronouns: He/Him

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Fuyu » Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:04 am

What we appear to need is a certain group responsible for managing the forum's YouTube Channel and the Wiki itself. A group that does what the Staff is unable to focus on for the moment. Even if temporal, a supportive group that could lend a hand. That's what I think it would save some work to the staff and speed up things a little bit.

Mable
Luigi
Luigi
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Mable » Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:41 am

Also updating SMBXWorlds would be nice.

Shadow Yoshi
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
Posts: 4291
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:56 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Shadow Yoshi » Sun Aug 31, 2014 12:58 pm

FanofSMBX wrote:I saw this on talkhaus
"Also you guys should get an actual name or something because having to say "the SMBX community" to refer to you is dumb. How about SMBXhaus or SMBXCentral"
I don't agree with the tone but I agree with the message. "The SMBX conmunity" creates ambiguity not only in general but between this and the 2009 forums.
I don't think that "the SMBX community" is a dumb way to refer to us. I've seen people say "the SMBX forums" or just "SMBX". We don't really need a name like what's been suggested.
FanofSMBX wrote:...and if I were to be honest I would say it sounds sorta hubristic for someone (Joey's the main example, but if Quill called this "SMBX community" on mfgg I would still be bothered) to claim that this is "the" forum. Not as in "the most popular SMBX forum" which would be true, but the idea that that popularity MAKES it "the SMBX forum"
It is, though.

lighthouse64
Charged Spiny
Charged Spiny
Posts: 1804
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 6:28 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby lighthouse64 » Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:01 pm

Seems like the time isn't very accurate. Maybe try using this code???

Code: Select all

<div align ="left">
<span id=tick2>
</span>
<script>
function show2(){
if (!document.all&&!document.getElementById)
return
thelement=document.getElementById? document.getElementById("tick2"): document.all.tick2
var word ="Time";
var Digital=new Date();
var hours=Digital.getHours();
var minutes=Digital.getMinutes();
var dn="PM";
if (hours<12)
dn="AM";
if (hours>12)
hours=hours-12
if (hours==0)
hours=12
if (minutes<=9)
minutes="0"+minutes;
var ctime= word+": "+hours+":"+minutes+""+dn;
thelement.innerHTML="<b style='font-size:14;color:blue;'>"+ctime+"</b>"
setTimeout("show2()",1000)
}
window.onload=show2
</script>
</div>
Just a suggestion on an update for the website. ;) Also That code works.

Shadow Yoshi
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
Posts: 4291
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:56 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Shadow Yoshi » Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:20 am

Does anybody have suggestions for stuff to put on the episodes/graphics pages? I'm already going to include links to previously featured content as well as official episodes/CGFX pack, but I'm sure we could find some other things to put there.

Magna
Banned
Posts: 1493
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Magna » Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:22 am

Joey wrote:Does anybody have suggestions for stuff to put on the episodes/graphics pages? I'm already going to include links to previously featured content as well as official episodes/CGFX pack, but I'm sure we could find some other things to put there.
Put links to all the GFX packs listed in the GFX Index thread.

zioy
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:47 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby zioy » Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:03 pm

I think that once castlewars finished the TCGA Remake, it should be featured.

HenryRichard
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2843
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:09 pm
Flair: Is this where I type my password?
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby HenryRichard » Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:56 pm

This may be a really stupid idea, but here goes.

You should have Graphics Judges. They would judge graphics depending on how good they are. If they are broken, messed up, or just downright horrible, they would go in the trashcan. Then you could have different sub-forums for other levels of brilliance, and then a graphics pack subforum.

Again, this might be a stupid idea that shouldn't even exist, but hopefully it's a good one.

FanofSMBX
Ludwig von Koopa
Ludwig von Koopa
Posts: 3878
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:01 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby FanofSMBX » Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:57 pm

Speaking of the trashcan, I stand by my assertion that that name is plain patronizing.

Fuyu
Fry Guy
Fry Guy
Posts: 3137
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:40 pm
Pronouns: He/Him

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Fuyu » Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:59 pm

We seriously need a mammoth place, who agrees?

Oh, and I think the there should be a rule that limits the maximum size of images in the signature, or the signature in general. It's rather annoying to search anything on it or just pass through when the user's signature is so damn big.

FanofSMBX
Ludwig von Koopa
Ludwig von Koopa
Posts: 3878
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:01 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby FanofSMBX » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:42 pm

You can just PM someone and ask them to put their signature in a spoiler.

zioy
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:47 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby zioy » Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:36 pm

Or you could just disable signatures in UCP...

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4787
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby aero » Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:16 pm

Natsu wrote:We seriously need a mammoth place, who agrees?

Oh, and I think the there should be a rule that limits the maximum size of images in the signature, or the signature in general. It's rather annoying to search anything on it or just pass through when the user's signature is so damn big.
There's settings that can limit the maximum size of an image so this could be do-able. By default it's unlimited for some reason.
KoolKat wrote:Or you could just disable signatures in UCP...
Good luck with that one.


Return to “SuperMarioBrosX.org”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari