M44: Midnight on the Docks (TOWN VICTORY)

The popular forum game that separates the good from the bad, the strong from the weak, and the loose-cannon cops from the slightly schizophrenic. That's all after we figure out who's who, of course.

Moderator: Userbase Moderators

Forum rules
Before you make a topic/post, consider the following:
-Is there a topic for this already?
-Is your post on-topic/appropriate?
-Are you posting in the right forum/following the forum rules?
Sevennights
Rex
Rex
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:52 pm
Flair: When's Mafia
Contact:

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby Sevennights » Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:41 pm

You only got me on the fact that i thought mech was scum, which they acted way too scummy for my tastes, that is why i tried to lynch them day 2. Also who was lynched d3?
oh it was xdestroy. Between that time frame i was in school so you actually cant really blame me there. i dont check in early in the morning and i play games at night. I check the fourms when metioned or when i have time. considering i might have went to sleep around day 3 thats a good idea.
so forgive me for being absent.

Sevennights
Rex
Rex
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:52 pm
Flair: When's Mafia
Contact:

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby Sevennights » Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:42 pm

I don't think danny will say anyways considering thge fact we got a lynch or lose sitiuation. So the chances of that being clarified is little to none. We have to go with guesses here i think

116taj
Spike
Spike
Posts: 269
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 8:07 pm

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby 116taj » Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:45 pm

I'm going to guess he flips green, because that's the color he is at the start of the game and probably until the end.

TDK
Phanto
Phanto
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:26 pm
Flair: Retired

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby TDK » Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:46 pm

116taj wrote: Warlock isn't in the clear yet, we don't have clarification if the acolyte flips blue of green.
Good point.

If the acolyte flips blue after the seer dies, then Warlock is in the clear.
If the acolyte flips green after the seer dies, then Warlock is the last wolf.

TDK
Phanto
Phanto
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:26 pm
Flair: Retired

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby TDK » Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:49 pm

Nanaya Jacob wrote:You only got me on the fact that i thought mech was scum, which they acted way too scummy for my tastes, that is why i tried to lynch them day 2. Also who was lynched d3?
oh it was xdestroy. Between that time frame i was in school so you actually cant really blame me there. i dont check in early in the morning and i play games at night. I check the fourms when metioned or when i have time. considering i might have went to sleep around day 3 thats a good idea.
so forgive me for being absent.
I suppose my reasoning for day 3 was rather poor, it did end early.

Still, you were rather quick to vote Mech in day 2.

TDK
Phanto
Phanto
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:26 pm
Flair: Retired

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby TDK » Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:54 pm

TheDinoKing wrote:
116taj wrote: Warlock isn't in the clear yet, we don't have clarification if the acolyte flips blue of green.
Good point.

If the acolyte flips blue after the seer dies, then Warlock is in the clear.
If the acolyte flips green after the seer dies, then Warlock is the last wolf.
Got confirmation that the acolyte flips blue after the seer dies.

So Warlock is confirmed to be the huntsman.

Sevennights
Rex
Rex
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:52 pm
Flair: When's Mafia
Contact:

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby Sevennights » Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:59 pm

I did not like mech claimed i believe they claimed at night and i wondered how they lived or even why no one counter claimed considering a blue did die. So my toughts were that mech was scum of some sort. Also considerig how mech acted thats rather bad.

Also from what the dan man said, the acolyte becomes blue when the seer dies. This means that warlock's huntsman claim seems more fair now

Sevennights
Rex
Rex
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:52 pm
Flair: When's Mafia
Contact:

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby Sevennights » Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:59 pm

116taj, this means you warlock might have actually tried to kill you. This deserves an explaination

116taj
Spike
Spike
Posts: 269
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 8:07 pm

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby 116taj » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:14 pm

Alright that's it. It's time to speak up here. I am the huntsman. I didn't want to say it but considering you guys are letting warlock of the hook, I had to say it.
the first night i decided to kill a random player because this was the first time i was a special and thought that's what you're supposed to do. then I got called out for killing night 1 and decided to not kill anyone after that (including xdestroy) because I thought it would cost us the game so I stayed silent and decided it was better to not nightkill anyone. I didn't claim earlier because I didn't want to be killed for no reason. Also why I tried to make a blue alliance so I could make my ability useful.
And as for warlock claiming to nightkill me but i was protected, how are you sure? no protection message showed up and he is only claiming to have nightkilled players he suspects right now (tdk and me) doesn't that seem a bit odd? So basically, I'm the huntsman and warlock is fake claiming so he can stay out of suspicion.

116taj
Spike
Spike
Posts: 269
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 8:07 pm

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby 116taj » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:17 pm

And with that, I'm going to vote Warlock

Sevennights
Rex
Rex
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:52 pm
Flair: When's Mafia
Contact:

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby Sevennights » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:18 pm

Now hold the fuck up.
Now, if you were the huntsman you should have claimed, both of you, eariler if possible. Claiming right now is bullshit. Now its between you two fools, and considering the two of you suspect each other the fuck.

116taj
Spike
Spike
Posts: 269
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 8:07 pm

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby 116taj » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:20 pm

Nanaya Jacob wrote:Now hold the fuck up.
Now, if you were the huntsman you should have claimed, both of you, eariler if possible. Claiming right now is bullshit. Now its between you two fools, and considering the two of you suspect each other the fuck.
I'm sorry for not claiming earlier, but I didn't want to be nightkilled by the stranger or the werewolves.

Sevennights
Rex
Rex
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:52 pm
Flair: When's Mafia
Contact:

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby Sevennights » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:26 pm

im leaning on lynching taj rn, taj has been rather helpful as a town tho
and
warlock made the claim first
but what have they down to help the town


this is rather bad situation

Warlock
Eerie
Eerie
Posts: 759
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:50 am
Flair: bep
Pronouns: they/them
Contact:

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby Warlock » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:27 pm

116taj wrote:
TheDinoKing wrote:Thanks for the claims.
So here's my suspicion list.

Warlock: There's only one blue left and he's the only one that claimed blue. So that means he's in the clear.
116taj: Tried to help find leads, and has been somewhat pro-town, although he has been bandwagoning sometimes. So I'm not sure.
Jacob: Probably who I have to say is the last werewolf. Tried to get Mechdragon (a potential blue) lynched on D2 and was absent when another werewolf was getting lynched on D3.
Warlock isn't in the clear yet, we don't have clarification if the acolyte flips blue of green.
The Acolyte becomes the Seer when the Seer dies so he cardflips blue.

TDK
Phanto
Phanto
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:26 pm
Flair: Retired

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby TDK » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:28 pm

116taj wrote:
Nanaya Jacob wrote:Now hold the fuck up.
Now, if you were the huntsman you should have claimed, both of you, eariler if possible. Claiming right now is bullshit. Now its between you two fools, and considering the two of you suspect each other the fuck.
I'm sorry for not claiming earlier, but I didn't want to be nightkilled by the stranger or the werewolves.
You should have realised that either this phase or the next is the last one, so nightkill isn't a issue.
So there was no point of not honestly claiming, unless you're the werewolf.

Warlock
Eerie
Eerie
Posts: 759
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:50 am
Flair: bep
Pronouns: they/them
Contact:

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby Warlock » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:28 pm

116taj wrote:Alright that's it. It's time to speak up here. I am the huntsman. I didn't want to say it but considering you guys are letting warlock of the hook, I had to say it.
the first night i decided to kill a random player because this was the first time i was a special and thought that's what you're supposed to do. then I got called out for killing night 1 and decided to not kill anyone after that (including xdestroy) because I thought it would cost us the game so I stayed silent and decided it was better to not nightkill anyone. I didn't claim earlier because I didn't want to be killed for no reason. Also why I tried to make a blue alliance so I could make my ability useful.
And as for warlock claiming to nightkill me but i was protected, how are you sure? no protection message showed up and he is only claiming to have nightkilled players he suspects right now (tdk and me) doesn't that seem a bit odd? So basically, I'm the huntsman and warlock is fake claiming so he can stay out of suspicion.
Because Danny sent me a PM saying it was cancelled.

TDK
Phanto
Phanto
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:26 pm
Flair: Retired

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby TDK » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:29 pm

Warlock wrote: ping
116taj wrote: ping
Both of you say who you killed each night phase and your reason for killing.

116taj
Spike
Spike
Posts: 269
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 8:07 pm

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby 116taj » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:33 pm

TheDinoKing wrote:
Warlock wrote: ping
116taj wrote: ping
Both of you say who you killed each night phase and your reason for killing.
Like I said, I only killed night 1.
Night 1 kill: Cedur

Warlock
Eerie
Eerie
Posts: 759
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:50 am
Flair: bep
Pronouns: they/them
Contact:

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby Warlock » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:34 pm

Let's go over my kills now, right?

N1: Pseudo - It was a rather risky move but It seems to have paid off. Not too experienced with Mafia on these forums tbh (not that it justified killing on the first night).
N2: No Kill. - Didn't have enough leads to justify a kill. Also took some feedback from other players saying the N1 kill was a risky move.
N3: 166taj (Failed) - He seemed fairly suspicious to be honest, plus I was aware the xDestroy was either going to die N3 or be lynched D3, which is why I never went for him.
N4: TheDinoKing (Failed) - He was one of my top suspects at the time, however nobody really mentioned it so I thought I'd take the chance. Obviously that never worked as the wave happened.

TDK
Phanto
Phanto
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:26 pm
Flair: Retired

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Postby TDK » Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:45 pm

Warlock, your kill attempt claims keep on contradicting each other.
So either you're the last werewolf or you have a bad memory.


Return to “Mafia”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari