Site Discussion Thread

This is where we'll store the "best" topics that have ever existed on the forums, as well as community events that are no longer relevant. Read at your own risk.

Moderator: Userbase Moderators

Forum rules
Read at your own risk.
underFlo
Wart
Wart
Posts: 4456
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:44 am
Flair: sup im lesbiab
Pronouns: They/She
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby underFlo » Tue May 02, 2017 3:21 pm

King of Eterity wrote:
Ace wrote:
Inspirited wrote:Hey there, I'd like to apply for forum staff. I'll make sure nobody will spam or shitpost.
Not gonna happen, I wouldn't want to be banned for my username being too short.
Since when did anyone suggest that there should be a minimum length for a username?
Inspirited called Ace out because he thought his username was too short.

Thehelmetguy1
Boom Boom
Boom Boom
Posts: 2372
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:33 am
Flair: certified idiot

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Thehelmetguy1 » Tue May 02, 2017 5:50 pm

Spinda wrote:
King of Eterity wrote:
Ace wrote: Not gonna happen, I wouldn't want to be banned for my username being too short.
Since when did anyone suggest that there should be a minimum length for a username?
Inspirited called Ace out because he thought his username was too short.
Lol what

kr4k1n
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2926
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2016 8:02 pm
Flair: cats are cool
Pronouns: he/him/his
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby kr4k1n » Tue May 02, 2017 6:49 pm

thehelmetguy1 wrote:
Spinda wrote:
King of Eterity wrote: Since when did anyone suggest that there should be a minimum length for a username?
Inspirited called Ace out because he thought his username was too short.
Lol what
To be real honest, I think we're fine in terms of username length, not much of a reason to change how long or short it can be
Inspirited wrote:Hey there, I'd like to apply for forum staff. I'll make sure nobody will spam or shitpost.
You may have to wait a very long time before any moderators get replaced

Zeldamaster12
Cid
Cid
Posts: 4105
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:43 pm
Flair: stop looking at my flair dangit

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Zeldamaster12 » Tue May 02, 2017 10:34 pm

Snessy the duck wrote:
HeroLinik wrote:
Snessy the duck wrote:I think a good addition to the forums would be the ability to change your name at will instead of having to PM an admin, which can take quite some time if they're not online.
As far as I know, I think they did that quite early on in the forum's life, but it got removed because it's got so much potential to be abused with people changing their names way too frequently.
How about making it so you have to wait for some time (Like a week or so) after changing your name before you can change it again?
I mean, we usually only allow name changes once every several months. If people change their name on a weekly basis, then I guarantee you there will be nothing but confusion.

In short, I'm afraid we're not going to do this.

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Fri May 05, 2017 11:03 am

In my honest opinion, I don't really think the GIF thread in Sandbox should be open, as I feel nonsensical stuff like that is better suited for the Discord chat, and it's also breaking the forum rules by being an image thread.

ElectriKong
Bowser
Bowser
Posts: 4652
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:32 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby ElectriKong » Fri May 05, 2017 11:45 am

Snessy the duck wrote:In my honest opinion, I don't really think the GIF thread in Sandbox should be open, as I feel nonsensical stuff like that is better suited for the Discord chat, and it's also breaking the forum rules by being an image thread.
Should we also close the screenshot thread because that is centered around images

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Fri May 05, 2017 11:50 am

King of Eterity wrote:
Snessy the duck wrote:In my honest opinion, I don't really think the GIF thread in Sandbox should be open, as I feel nonsensical stuff like that is better suited for the Discord chat, and it's also breaking the forum rules by being an image thread.
Should we also close the screenshot thread because that is centered around images
No, because that thread is centered around something something that can spark discussion (Comments on level design, graphics etc.) while the GIF thread is just plain shitposting that doesn't promote any discussion whatsoever.

Mable
Luigi
Luigi
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Mable » Fri May 05, 2017 11:52 am

We should demote the entire staff for not following their own rules, and rather have fun instead being total sadistic prison wardens.

We all shall repeat ourselfs with each reply also and destroy the word fun.

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Fri May 05, 2017 12:02 pm

Mable wrote:We should demote the entire staff for not following their own rules, and rather have fun instead being total sadistic prison wardens.

We all shall repeat ourselfs with each reply also and destroy the word fun.
What exactly do you mean by that? I'm in no way saying that you shouldn't try to have fun on here, I'm just saying that that kind of thread isn't allowed by the forum rules, and as such, shouldn't be here. I did say that you could do a thing like that in the Discord chat though.

Mable
Luigi
Luigi
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Mable » Fri May 05, 2017 12:05 pm

Why do you not want to ignore the thread just completly? Or why didn't you start this when it was made? Why now in the middle?

JupiHornet
Boom Boom
Boom Boom
Posts: 2399
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 5:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby JupiHornet » Fri May 05, 2017 12:13 pm

Snessy the duck wrote:In my honest opinion, I don't really think the GIF thread in Sandbox should be open, as I feel nonsensical stuff like that is better suited for the Discord chat, and it's also breaking the forum rules by being an image thread.
You seriously need to lighten up a little bit. One thread that's full of images just for fun isn't hurting anybody.

Thehelmetguy1
Boom Boom
Boom Boom
Posts: 2372
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:33 am
Flair: certified idiot

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Thehelmetguy1 » Fri May 05, 2017 12:15 pm

Mabel just came back and I already respect him.

Now, Snessy, why are you so salty about some image shitposting? People are just having fun and I don't think the forums should be that serious and harsh. Yes, being harsh and serious is important, but I don't think you can exaggerate on this, or else people will eventually get bored and leave. I would understand if that was offending or hurting people, but as JupiHornet said above, a little thread full of images doesn't hurt anybody.

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Fri May 05, 2017 12:21 pm

The whole reason this I'm kinda salty about it is because it's an image thread, which is not allowed by the forum rules, so it shouldn't be here as of now. I might have mentioned otherwise in some of my comments, but that wasn't my intention. I would respect it some more if image threads were actually allowed by the forum rules, or if there was an exception for that thread specifically in the rules.

Thehelmetguy1
Boom Boom
Boom Boom
Posts: 2372
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:33 am
Flair: certified idiot

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Thehelmetguy1 » Fri May 05, 2017 12:23 pm

Snessy the duck wrote:The whole reason this I'm kinda salty about it is because it's an image thread, which is not allowed by the forum rules, so it shouldn't be here as of now. I might have mentioned otherwise in some of my comments, but that wasn't my intention. I would respect it some more if image threads were actually allowed by the forum rules or if that thread was an exception in the rules, but they aren't as of now, so I don't see the reason it's there.
Ya know, backseat moderating is also against the rules

JupiHornet
Boom Boom
Boom Boom
Posts: 2399
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 5:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby JupiHornet » Fri May 05, 2017 12:24 pm

Snessy the duck wrote:The whole reason this I'm kinda salty about it is because it's an image thread, which is not allowed by the forum rules, so it shouldn't be here as of now. I might have mentioned otherwise in some of my comments, but that wasn't my intention. I would respect it some more if image threads were actually allowed by the forum rules or if that thread was an exception in the rules, but they aren't as of now, so I don't see the reason it's there.
I T ' S J U S T F O R F U N
Look, you do realize that you're the only person that's upset about this, right? Us mods don't care, the admins don't care, even Joey, the owner of SMBX.org, doesn't care (and in fact, he made the original GIF thread). So please stop.

HeroLinik
Larry Koopa
Larry Koopa
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby HeroLinik » Fri May 05, 2017 12:24 pm

Snessy the duck wrote:The whole reason this I'm kinda salty about it is because it's an image thread, which is not allowed by the forum rules, so it shouldn't be here as of now. I might have mentioned otherwise in some of my comments, but that wasn't my intention. I would respect it some more if image threads were actually allowed by the forum rules, or if there was an exception for that thread specifically in the rules.
Yeah, but is it hurting anyone? As was mentioned earlier, if the entire place was serious and that and joking wasn't allowed, nobody would want to remain here. Everyone needs to have some fun, and that's the point of the GIF thread. Also, the same thread could be the reason why image threads aren't allowed. Also, it's just a single thread in a forum, why do you need to be so het up about it?

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Fri May 05, 2017 12:27 pm

I get what you're saying, and I think we could fix this issue by having an exception for that thread in the forum rules.

underFlo
Wart
Wart
Posts: 4456
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:44 am
Flair: sup im lesbiab
Pronouns: They/She
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby underFlo » Fri May 05, 2017 12:30 pm

Snessy the duck wrote:I get what you're saying, and I think we could fix this issue by having an exception for that thread in the forum rules.
What you're missing is that there's no issue to be fixed here - you're making one up for some reason.

Julia Pseudo
Luigi
Luigi
Posts: 5609
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 12:04 am
Flair: gay gaymer girl
Pronouns: She/her

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Julia Pseudo » Fri May 05, 2017 12:32 pm

Snessy the duck wrote:I get what you're saying, and I think we could fix this issue by having an exception for that thread in the forum rules.
That's not necessary. The fact that the thread was created by a staff member and explicitly approved by Joey implies on its own that its existence is an exception to the forum rules. It's OK to have one or two shitposting threads and have fun once in a while - you're too caught up in the exact letter of the rules. Lighten up, please...

PixelPest
Link
Link
Posts: 7111
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:38 pm
Flair: Tamer of Boom Booms
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby PixelPest » Fri May 05, 2017 12:33 pm

Snessy you don't need to micromanage the forums


Return to “Archives”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari