Levels forum redesign and more

NovaBros · Postby **NovaBros** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:34 pm

Just wondering, what happened to the Casual and Battle levels subforums? Are they coming back, or are they just going to be left abandoned?

PixelPest · Postby **PixelPest** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:44 pm

Gone. Casual Levels are just ones that you don't request reviews for and I guess you can just post Battle Levels if you want in your thread

WindyDelcarlo · Postby **WindyDelcarlo** » Tue Aug 23, 2016 4:44 pm

I personally preferred the separation, at the very least between battle levels and the rest of them. This might turn out fine, though

NovaBros · Postby **NovaBros** » Wed Aug 24, 2016 11:05 am

PixelPest wrote:Gone. Casual Levels are just ones that you don't request reviews for and I guess you can just post Battle Levels if you want in your thread

Oh, gotcha. Kinda sad that the subs are gone, but I guess I can deal with it.

PixelPest · Postby **PixelPest** » Wed Aug 24, 2016 11:21 am

It wouldn't make sense though to have them now though, since each person has one topic to post their levels. You can really just make subdivisions in your topic if you want

timocomsmbx2345 · Postby **timocomsmbx2345** » Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:37 pm

and yet still no signs of SMBX 2.0

underFlo · Postby **underFlo** » Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:39 pm

huh? A new WIP beta was just released.

Mable · Postby **Mable** » Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:12 am

I mean if you would have payed attention to the 2.0 thread you would have been one of the people who got their hands on it.

Those "No signs of 2.0" posts aren't cool either. Half of the people who keep acting like it won't ever be out and stuff, probably don't know how hard game making and stuff is.

timocomsmbx2345 · Postby **timocomsmbx2345** » Tue Aug 30, 2016 4:12 pm

Spinda wrote:huh? A new WIP beta was just released.

SHOW ME!!!!!

PixelPest · Postby **PixelPest** » Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:25 pm

timocomsmbx2345 wrote:
Spinda wrote:huh? A new WIP beta was just released.
SHOW ME!!!!!

You missed it. It was in the 2.0 thread and only available for a limited time

TLtimelord · Postby **TLtimelord** » Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:04 pm

Tinkerbell wrote:I mean if you would have payed attention to the 2.0 thread you would have been one of the people who got their hands on it.

Those "No signs of 2.0" posts aren't cool either. Half of the people who keep acting like it won't ever be out and stuff, probably don't know how hard game making and stuff is.

Can confirm. They're constantly working on it.

timocomsmbx2345 · Postby **timocomsmbx2345** » Thu Sep 01, 2016 5:58 pm

PixelPest wrote:
timocomsmbx2345 wrote:
Spinda wrote:huh? A new WIP beta was just released.
SHOW ME!!!!!
You missed it. It was in the 2.0 thread and only available for a limited time

Can anyone at least anyone PM me a copy of it?

I REALLY NEED IT!

Mable · Postby **Mable** » Sat Sep 03, 2016 10:41 am

So is it really so bad, if you don't have ur level thread say the name of ur username? Because apparently if you don't name it like ur name you didn't read the rules which would already mean, that i didn't do that and not follow them because i didn't name it something boring like Tinkerbells dank election levels and therefore named it Team Magma Hideout cause i wanted to be a bit creative.

PixelPest · Postby **PixelPest** » Sat Sep 03, 2016 11:02 am

Tinkerbell wrote:So is it really so bad, if you don't have ur level thread say the name of ur username? Because apparently if you don't name it like ur name you didn't read the rules which would already mean, that i didn't do that and not follow them because i didn't name it something boring like Tinkerbells dank election levels and therefore named it Team Magma Hideout cause i wanted to be a bit creative.

There's no issue. I have no idea where you're getting this from but it definitely isn't true

aero · Postby **aero** » Sat Sep 03, 2016 11:12 am

What do you mean, Tinkerbell?

Cedur · Postby **Cedur** » Sat Sep 03, 2016 11:27 am

Probably the stuff here

But either way, noone forces you to explicitely name your level topic as a collection. The rules are concise enough I think; if we notice someone making a second level topic then staff can just notify them and merge the threads.