<Shroom> Hey Aero, instead of just saying "all staff is useless", it's better to make efforts on letting the groups work more efficiently
<AeroMatter> I've been trying that and still want that. I'm just pointing that out.
<StrikeForcer> I really do not like Valterri's obstination on various legitimate issues the forums still has.
<Shroom> It's not the solution though, you can't expect to let the place be run without staff
Though I acknowledge that there's issues on the attitude of supreme admins
this "I strictly don't allow for anything I don't agree with" thing
<AeroMatter> We need to give someone a broom to clean up garbage topics, we don't need staff.
There's a separation between the meaning of staff and staff actions in practice.
<Shroom> We actually need
good staff
staff that's transparent and willing to listen
and also staff that has passion with running the site
<StrikeForcer> Passion ummm...no?
Transparent staff yes. I value honestly above just passion because its also a sign of competence.
<AeroMatter> You can find someone like that, they'll do that for a month or two, and then we have the same problem again.
Best thing to do is make staff obsolete, and make it harder for them to shut down discussion.
It's the only way (that I see) that transparency could last if the "right people" are in charge.
<Shroom> Joey and ZM are surely not enough to run this place, you would notice changes
<StrikeForcer> Or how about the forum take a page out of SMWC's post leniency policy that is in effect:
http://www.smwcentral.net/?p=viewthread&t=84246 (Basically that moderators and admins should only get involved in shutting down spam topics and posts (not ironic shitposts) and true threats against other members)
<Shroom> Mods and admins are supposed to moderate (duh, as in monitoring threads and users) and admins are also supposed to handle server stuff, game masters are supposed to run Mafia (and RPs if they happen) and LJs are supposed to organize levels. User reps, if created, are supposed to be contact persons.
I'd rather wait for Joey/Valtteri to respond about if they want to make URs a thing and if they want to promote new mods. Before that I wouldn't be so pessimistic.
Staff should not build up a dictature but without staff the forums will fall apart.
Without staff, who shall actually have powers? Everyone? You can imagine what this means (I don't need to be sarcastic there)
Also with "passion" I rather mean the following: "Staff aims at making the place interesting and at giving new members a good guiding hand on how to integrate themselves. ESPECIALLY they don't continuously pretend like everything's okay the way it is and they don't say "we're only here to do the little and mandatory administrative tasks". If they should be slacking, they don't use the always-same phrases like "we're working behind the scenes".
<StrikeForcer> "Staff aims at making the place interesting and at giving new members a good guiding hand on how to integrate themselves. ESPECIALLY they don't continuously pretend like everything's okay the way it is and they don't say "we're only here to do the little and mandatory administrative tasks". If they should be slacking, they don't use the always-same phrases like "we're working behind the scenes". - That can be done by the userbase to guide newbies to integrate into the community.
Rather than staff.
And even so, its up to them to learn how they can integrate
The different groups are supposed to do things, but they don't. Honestly if you go through each staff member they basically do nothing to keep the forum together. The Game Masters seem to be the only exception, but they're not staff.
<Shroom> The only needless staff is Squishy Rex, Mivixion and Redigit
the rest does stuff, actually
handling reports and posts that break common habits is already important
<StrikeForcer> Um Shroom, I dont think you should list Redigit into this since he is a unique case.
In that he is only there for matters regarding the SMBX source code. Not for anything more than that.(edited)
<AeroMatter> Squishy, Mivixion, m4sterbr0s, Pseudo, Redigit, Valtteri.
<Shroom> at least Redigit's default group is to be changed
<AeroMatter> All of them do nothing or trivial tasks.
<bossedit8> love how masterbros is still in there despite the fact that he hasn't done anything in a long while
<AeroMatter> It's in case he ever comes back!!!
Any day now!!!!
<Shroom> yeah, masterbros is displayed as black to show that he's not active
though there wouldn't be any harm with demoting him right now
staff needs a rehaul, but not any kind of abolishing
EDIT: StrikeForcer told right after that he's gone back against on the idea of post leniency after further discussion regarding the state of the community
<StrikeForcer> And as I mentioned earlier (that was ignored for some reason), I did say that the moderators and admins should only be moderating the forums for spam and harrassment (actual credible harrassment such as like death threats). Just like how SMWC does it with their recent post leniency policy.(edited)
<Shroom> discipline includes more than that
I'm absolutely against too much post leniency
<StrikeForcer> You misunderstand.
Allow me to clarify.
<AeroMatter> Post leniency is bad without self moderation.
<Shroom> Actually I even think our staff should sometimes delete posts rather than replying "please make constructive posts"
<AeroMatter> We'll see how the thread goes. I don't agree with staff deciding what is and is not constructive either btw.
<Shroom> I guess they have a good sense for that, but they should just handle it apropriately
if a newbie makes 1-word-posts like "cool" on an episode, there's nothing wrong with deleting that
and the mod doing the action can PM the user
<StrikeForcer> <AeroMatter> "Post leniency is bad without self moderation." - Though im not sure how good SMBX's community is at with self-moderation but I know from my observations but I think that the fundamental thing you guys are mssing is that post leniency does not mean one can spam willy-nilly. In fact, I have seen topics that are not witty or even an ironic shitpost on SMWC trashed recently because those people do not understand what the userbase there wanted out of post leniency.
Its not a total and complete hands-off approach at moderation but rather the community wanting to advance discussion on their terms without the risk of people making funposts (ironic shitposts) being warned or banned.
Though I do understand that the drawbacks hinges upon if the standards of what the community thinks of proper discussion as well as what is a funny joke. And I am under the assumption that standards of this community has improved from a few years
<Shroom> well, indeed I'm only talking about spamming matters, such as abusing smilies, exclamation marks or capitalization (EDIT: or bumping and postcounting in general)
and that should be handled
<AeroMatter> That's the only legitimate purpose for having staff.
It happens too rarely, thankfully, to have dedicated groups for it.
Other places have janitor groups for stuff like that.
<Shroom> We'll just have to learn a few things:
1) Mods can't come online 24/7 by nature, but still they're efficient enough to handle it within a reasonable time.
2) Mods have a life, but still they're willing to spend time on managing and guiding the community, that's (usually) something really commendable.
3) Mods exist because of qualification (at least in theory). There's certain aspects of administrative tasks that should be simply taken away from the entire public, for everyone's benefit (e.g. the power to delete posts; trolls exist and are dangerous)
4) Generally without staff the place will fall apart. On Runouw.com half of the staff has quit because of the constant drama, and the aftermath is a nearly-dead community.
Also 5) you've already found a major purpose for staff to exist, but there surely is more than that. Yeah, I don't wanna support any lines of "we do work behind the scenes" as excuses for staff inactivity, but this work exists indeed