Arkansas Takes Away 7 Homeschooled Children

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:02 pm

*rest of topic because it's too long*

http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/01/18/ark ... upplement/

I have to rush so I would give my two cents on the topic if I could but otherwise discuss it so when I get back I can reply.

JupiHornet · Postby **JupiHornet** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 9:06 pm

Overprotective much?

Now it would be different if the family had drugs or something, but the substance that family had wasn't illegal, just unapproved. Plus, the family used it for purifying garden water.

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 9:51 pm

Turtwig wrote:Overprotective much?

Now it would be different if the family had drugs or something, but the substance that family had wasn't illegal, just unapproved. Plus, the family used it for purifying garden water.

Plus it can cure cancer and AIDS so way to go for killing everyone off with alcohol, tobacco, and FDA-approved drugs.

FallingSnow · Postby **FallingSnow** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:00 am

8bitmushroom wrote:
Turtwig wrote:Overprotective much?

Now it would be different if the family had drugs or something, but the substance that family had wasn't illegal, just unapproved. Plus, the family used it for purifying garden water.
Plus it can cure cancer and AIDS so way to go for killing everyone off with alcohol, tobacco, and FDA-approved drugs.

A “miracle” mineral treatment alleged to be a remedy for cancer and AIDS

Big difference between alleged remedy and cure by the way.

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:03 am

Sorry my wording was wrong, that could have been taken way out of context.

aero · Postby **aero** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:17 pm

Stuff like this makes me think children should be able to decide whether to leave or not with the police. This is what happens when the government is your kids' nanny.

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:59 pm

GhostHawk wrote:Stuff like this makes me think children should be able to decide whether to leave or not with the police. This is what happens when the government is your kids' nanny.

Did you hear about the 17-year old girl that had cancer but didn't want chemo, though she wasn't considered an adult so the government took her away and forced her into chemo and put her into a foster home? She ran away multiple times because she didn't want the poison they forced her to take.

I don't know what they'd tell the kids to force them into the cars, if the kid says no and refuses, what are they going to do? Because if they forcefully shove the child in, you can report that as child abuse or assault on a minor. Somebody brought up that topic and somebody else replied saying you'd have to be a real brat to not go with the nice officers, I forget where I saw this, I just remember I saw it.

Karl Marx · Postby **Karl Marx** » Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:06 am

https://www.mmsgreenlife.com/jim-humble ... entic.html
Here's the site for the "unapproved substance." It says it's 28% Chlorine Dioxide, which Wikipedia says is often used in bleaching.

Make of that what you may.

Do I believe the government had the right to take those kids away? Of course not. Although you have to admit, the site looks like of sketchy...

mariogeek2 · Postby **mariogeek2** » Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:33 am

God, the U.S. government is getting out of hand. This reminds of a story I saw about an organic co-op that was shut down because its foods were "potentially dangerous." Here's the full story in this video:

The F.D.A isn't even for your health anymore. It's basically become the hands of the giant pharmaceutical companies and food corporations, such as Monsanto.

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:56 am

Karl Marx wrote:https://www.mmsgreenlife.com/jim-humble ... entic.html
Here's the site for the "unapproved substance." It says it's 28% Chlorine Dioxide, which Wikipedia says is often used in bleaching.

Make of that what you may.

Do I believe the government had the right to take those kids away? Of course not. Although you have to admit, the site looks like of sketchy...

I'd rather, quite honestly take in 28% of Chlorine Dioxide than the GMOs that they're feeding to us nowadays.

mariogeek2 · Postby **mariogeek2** » Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:32 am

8bitmushroom wrote:I'd rather, quite honestly take in 28% of Chlorine Dioxide than the GMOs that they're feeding to us nowadays.

Me too! I just found an article telling about rats growing tumors after being fed a lifetime of GMO-corn.

Here's the article here:http://www.naturalnews.com/037249_GMO_s ... amage.html

John The White Yoshi · Postby **John The White Yoshi** » Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:10 pm

mariogeek2 wrote:
8bitmushroom wrote:I'd rather, quite honestly take in 28% of Chlorine Dioxide than the GMOs that they're feeding to us nowadays.
Me too! I just found an article telling about rats growing tumors after being fed a lifetime of GMO-corn.

Here's the article here:http://www.naturalnews.com/037249_GMO_s ... amage.html

I had two pet rats that died because of tumors.

They were 4-5 years old though.

ON TOPIC
The government needs to pull their heads out of their asses and get real. This kids shouldn't have been taken away, but that's reality and I think reality needs to go f*** itself in a corner to The Beatles.

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:13 pm

SuperWhiteYoshi64 wrote:
mariogeek2 wrote:
8bitmushroom wrote:I'd rather, quite honestly take in 28% of Chlorine Dioxide than the GMOs that they're feeding to us nowadays.
Me too! I just found an article telling about rats growing tumors after being fed a lifetime of GMO-corn.

Here's the article here:http://www.naturalnews.com/037249_GMO_s ... amage.html
I had two pet rats that died because of tumors.
They were 4-5 years old though.

Okay, but not the topic to be talking about that.