M14: The SMBX Forum Mafia [Normal Users Win!]

Waddle · Postby **Waddle** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:05 pm

The problem is that we really dont have any information whatsoever.

MacheTheFerret · Postby **MacheTheFerret** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:12 pm

I think Safety might be our best option for now, unless someone has some evidence.

Postby **Marina** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:20 pm

Nick could you maybe pretty pls cross off the dead members in the main post, that would be gr8 <3

Ignoritus · Postby **Ignoritus** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:35 pm

Lynch Nien.

If I'm wrong you can lynch me tomorrow and I'll put up no defense, but I am 100% sure that he is Redigit. I have given another member who I knew to be safe proof of this, but I won't name them yet unless they don't want to come forward with this proof and risk becoming a target.

Waddle · Postby **Waddle** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:36 pm

Ignoritus wrote:Lynch Nien.

If I'm wrong you can lynch me tomorrow and I'll put up no defense, but I am 100% sure that he is Redigit. I have given another member who I knew to be safe proof of this, but I won't name them yet unless they don't want to come forward with this proof.

Ill see what nien has to say about this.
safety for now though.

RudeGuy · Postby **RudeGuy** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:41 pm

Too bad that those people died, they often get who the mafia members are.
I too am gonna go with safety for now.

underFlo · Postby **underFlo** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:42 pm

GMarinaX wrote:Nick could you maybe pretty pls cross off the dead members in the main post, that would be gr8 <3

done

Choco · Postby **Choco** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:49 pm

As of now, Safety is our best option.

Postby **Shadow Yoshi** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:59 pm

Quick note: "safety" is not a vote. You must vote for someone or you risk getting a phantom, as per the rules.

underFlo · Postby **underFlo** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:01 pm

Joey wrote:Quick note: "safety" is not a vote. You must vote for someone or you risk getting a phantom, as per the rules.

About all the last games had Safety votes as a random vote.

Ignoritus · Postby **Ignoritus** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:04 pm

I'm serious, lynch Nien. There could be absolutely no motive for me to outright to tell you to lynch Nien at risk of my own life if I was lying. If I was Admin/Level Judge it wouldn't be worth kamikazing to get one random person lynched, and it can't even be that I'm trying to get the Nien (role) lynched in order to claim reputation, since I said he's the Redigit which cardflips yellow.

Ignoritus · Postby **Ignoritus** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:06 pm

If you random lynch you might kill someone you need to.
If you lynch Nien you will definitely uncover someone as even if Nien wasn't Redigit (which he is), my reputation rests on this meaning I'd be exposed as someone to lynch.

Postby **Shadow Yoshi** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:07 pm

Okay, sorry for the confusion. I don't like random lynch voting, though, because it discourages detective work.

Please go back to voting for real players. To reiterate the rules:

To vote, simply post the player's name in bold red (failure to do so may result in your vote not being counted). You are allowed to change your vote (post again with a different player's name), but you cannot retract it.

Choco · Postby **Choco** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:09 pm

How much detective work do you think we can do on Night 1? We're not going to get phantoms just because nobody is suspicious.

underFlo · Postby **underFlo** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:10 pm

Joey wrote:Okay, sorry for the confusion. I don't like random lynch voting, though, because it discourages detective work.

Please go back to voting for real players. To reiterate the rules:

To vote, simply post the player's name in bold red (failure to do so may result in your vote not being counted). You are allowed to change your vote (post again with a different player's name), but you cannot retract it.

I think Safety votes (or any votes that don't cause th eplayer to vote for someone specific just to be active) are not all that bad. I also don't really know since it's been seen as a given for the last few rounds prior. If it really isn't allowed, I'll forbid Safetys.
I actually favor lynch votes for Nobody over Safetys since they are less risky, but Safety has been such an ongoing tradition I didn't quite wanna break it.

Postby **Marina** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:10 pm

Well, I'd rather take Igno's word for that instead of having a random, potentially innocent person lynched. (As of now the chances of lynching someone innocent are 3:2, so I'd rather save those safety votes for more difficult times.) Sorry Nien if you're one of us, but well, if you're not Redigit, then Igno will have some 'splainin' to do.

Choco · Postby **Choco** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:12 pm

I guess we should go for Nien. If he's innocent, we know Ignoritus ain't that innocent.

underFlo · Postby **underFlo** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:14 pm

Nien and Safety are tied atm with 3 votes each.

Postby **Shadow Yoshi** » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:15 pm

Choco wrote:How much detective work do you think we can do on Night 1? We're not going to get phantoms just because nobody is suspicious.

Maybe not Night 1 so much, but Day 1 is good for detective work.

To clarify: safeties themselves (i.e. "I'll put a safety on Choco", because you don't have any leads and want to not get a phantom so you'll put a vote on someone who won't get lynched) are not against the rules. I was putting a stop to simply saying "Safety" because that doesn't harbor discussion.