Winter Contest: The Winner and the Runner-up

Official community level contests.

Moderator: Userbase Moderators

Valtteri
Birdo
Birdo
Posts: 2150
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby Valtteri » Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:00 pm

8bitmushroom wrote:
I'll make the scores without the punishment minuses visible in the results but your placement will be based on the decreased score. It's really your fault for not following the rules and I think it's a reasonable punishment.

FanofSMBX
Ludwig von Koopa
Ludwig von Koopa
Posts: 3878
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:01 pm

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby FanofSMBX » Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Mark my words someone would have been top ten but they get a down mark. Is that something you want to be fine with, Valtteri? It sorta mechanically makes sense, but I can imagine hurt feelings.

Radishl
Guest

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby Radishl » Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:40 pm

Fanof you participating this contest?

silent_
Birdo
Birdo
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby silent_ » Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:41 pm

Valtteri wrote:It's really your fault for not following the rules and I think it's a reasonable punishment.
Well it's not my fault that I still don't know how to make a download contain anything more than a folder.

And most of my answers are like "highlight your level folder, .mp3 and .lvl and then send it to a .zip folder" when that doesn't work for me and I get an error message.

zioy
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:47 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Contact:

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby zioy » Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:43 pm

Then put them in a folder and then put the folder in a .zip, that should be allowed.

silent_
Birdo
Birdo
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby silent_ » Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:45 pm

krazykat wrote:Then put them in a folder and then put the folder in a .zip, that should be allowed.
No, that's not allowed.

zioy
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:47 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Contact:

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby zioy » Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:49 pm

Kep wrote:
krazykat wrote:Then put them in a folder and then put the folder in a .zip, that should be allowed.
No, that's not allowed.
Technically it should be since the "send to zip" feature of Windows does that.

silent_
Birdo
Birdo
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby silent_ » Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:52 pm

krazykat wrote:
Kep wrote:
krazykat wrote:Then put them in a folder and then put the folder in a .zip, that should be allowed.
No, that's not allowed.
Technically it should be since the "send to zip" feature of Windows does that.
But the .mp3 and .lvl are still in the folder, and that's the whole point of the rule: Leave them out.

zioy
Reznor
Reznor
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:47 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Contact:

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby zioy » Thu Nov 27, 2014 7:00 pm

But the graphics are in their own folder.
It's like this:

.zip-> folder-> graphics folder+level+music+readme

MistakesWereMade
Torpedo Ted
Torpedo Ted
Posts: 1646
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:13 pm

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby MistakesWereMade » Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:36 pm

Kep wrote:
Valtteri wrote:It's really your fault for not following the rules and I think it's a reasonable punishment.
Well it's not my fault that I still don't know how to make a download contain anything more than a folder.
i mean it IS your fault that you don't have a certain knowledge

MECHDRAGON777
Pink Yoshi Egg
Pink Yoshi Egg
Posts: 6422
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:40 pm
Flair: Nuclear Queen of Reversion.
Contact:

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby MECHDRAGON777 » Fri Nov 28, 2014 12:44 am

Nien wrote:
Kep wrote:
Valtteri wrote:It's really your fault for not following the rules and I think it's a reasonable punishment.
Well it's not my fault that I still don't know how to make a download contain anything more than a folder.
i mean it IS your fault that you don't have a certain knowledge
I do not think it is someone's Dalit if someone else never taught the person in question! So, koolcat's suggestion should work since it is bassicly the same format that Valtteri is asking for!

It would also be upsetting if I made first, just because about half of the contestants get a few points deducted! Or if any one else gets first because all of the better levels get several points deducted! I Agree that I think the point drop is fair in a way, but the reverse side of the mirror is this: you can easily over look something like that! I am just trying to point out pros and cons. Some people might support it just so they rely on the rule and point deduction to win over people who do not pay attentiön, and it would fell like they were cheated out of victory! I am studding the rules just so I do not get points deducted!

Another thing, why do a point reductiön, I know this was already said ,but, why not half or less a point, because recently , these contests have a difference 0,1 and I seen two levels have. Difference of less then 0,0001. So, half would be modes fair, or, if you disqualify them, that meNs they can use the level in the next contest (if they wanted to) and all they would have to do is fix the error that broke the rule! Would that be more fair?

Could taking off because a level is to long, to short, to hard, or to easy be any more unfair? This seems like it is I. The same ball park! I do not mind the rules my self, but if I win just because of the rules, or someone is cheated out of first, I do not want to be the one who caused all of the grief! If anyone asks, I am not taking sides on this matter , but could it be weighed a bit more?

Anywho, I wish every one good luck in the contest! I hope bossedit8, elitalianoverde, and as303298. Place high, if they entered and send a level that is! Good luck!

underFlo
Wart
Wart
Posts: 4456
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:44 am
Flair: sup im lesbiab
Pronouns: They/She
Contact:

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby underFlo » Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:39 am

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:
Nien wrote:
Kep wrote: Well it's not my fault that I still don't know how to make a download contain anything more than a folder.
i mean it IS your fault that you don't have a certain knowledge
I do not think it is someone's Dalit if someone else never taught the person in question! So, koolcat's suggestion should work since it is bassicly the same format that Valtteri is asking for!

It would also be upsetting if I made first, just because about half of the contestants get a few points deducted! Or if any one else gets first because all of the better levels get several points deducted! I Agree that I think the point drop is fair in a way, but the reverse side of the mirror is this: you can easily over look something like that! I am just trying to point out pros and cons. Some people might support it just so they rely on the rule and point deduction to win over people who do not pay attentiön, and it would fell like they were cheated out of victory! I am studding the rules just so I do not get points deducted!

Another thing, why do a point reductiön, I know this was already said ,but, why not half or less a point, because recently , these contests have a difference 0,1 and I seen two levels have. Difference of less then 0,0001. So, half would be modes fair, or, if you disqualify them, that meNs they can use the level in the next contest (if they wanted to) and all they would have to do is fix the error that broke the rule! Would that be more fair?

Could taking off because a level is to long, to short, to hard, or to easy be any more unfair? This seems like it is I. The same ball park! I do not mind the rules my self, but if I win just because of the rules, or someone is cheated out of first, I do not want to be the one who caused all of the grief! If anyone asks, I am not taking sides on this matter , but could it be weighed a bit more?

Anywho, I wish every one good luck in the contest! I hope bossedit8, elitalianoverde, and as303298. Place high, if they entered and send a level that is! Good luck!
> punishment too bad

That's exactly what they're going for. It's not that hard to do this the right way, and it gives extra work to all the people holding this. It's not a hard rule to follow, and that's why I think the -1 point is ok. They want to make people fear breaking the rule.

Also the contest judges should already take off points if a level is goo long/short/hard so a point reduction is unnecessary there.

MECHDRAGON777
Pink Yoshi Egg
Pink Yoshi Egg
Posts: 6422
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:40 pm
Flair: Nuclear Queen of Reversion.
Contact:

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby MECHDRAGON777 » Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:45 am

Nickname wrote:
MECHDRAGON777 wrote:[quote="Nien"
I do not think it is someone's Dalit if someone else never taught the person in question! So, koolcat's suggestion should work since it is bassicly the same format that Valtteri is asking for!

It would also be upsetting if I made first, just because about half of the contestants get a few points deducted! Or if any one else gets first because all of the better levels get several points deducted! I Agree that I think the point drop is fair in a way, but the reverse side of the mirror is this: you can easily over look something like that! I am just trying to point out pros and cons. Some people might support it just so they rely on the rule and point deduction to win over people who do not pay attentiön, and it would fell like they were cheated out of victory! I am studding the rules just so I do not get points deducted!

Another thing, why do a point reductiön, I know this was already said ,but, why not half or less a point, because recently , these contests have a difference 0,1 and I seen two levels have. Difference of less then 0,0001. So, half would be modes fair, or, if you disqualify them, that meNs they can use the level in the next contest (if they wanted to) and all they would have to do is fix the error that broke the rule! Would that be more fair?

Could taking off because a level is to long, to short, to hard, or to easy be any more unfair? This seems like it is I. The same ball park! I do not mind the rules my self, but if I win just because of the rules, or someone is cheated out of first, I do not want to be the one who caused all of the grief! If anyone asks, I am not taking sides on this matter , but could it be weighed a bit more?

Anywho, I wish every one good luck in the contest! I hope bossedit8, elitalianoverde, and as303298. Place high, if they entered and send a level that is! Good luck!
> punishment too bad

That's exactly what they're going for. It's not that hard to do this the right way, and it gives extra work to all the people holding this. It's not a hard rule to follow, and that's why I think the -1 point is ok. They want to make people fear breaking the rule.

Also the contest judges should already take off points if a level is goo long/short/hard so a point reduction is unnecessary there.
I wonder how many people overlook this and lose about 3 points then!

AirSeus
Blue Yoshi Egg
Blue Yoshi Egg
Posts: 1121
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:40 pm
Flair: Ok no
Pronouns: He/Him

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby AirSeus » Fri Nov 28, 2014 2:41 am

Hey, I have submitted a level about a week ago, how come I have not been bolded?

Blck_Guy
Guest

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby Blck_Guy » Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:33 am

AirSeus wrote:Hey, I have submitted a level about a week ago, how come I have not been bolded?

Admins are being lazy!!

Flying Brick
Chain Chomp
Chain Chomp
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2014 3:16 pm

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby Flying Brick » Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:39 am

Blck_Guy wrote: Admins are being lazy!!
That, or they simply made a mistake. Don't be so quick to judge...

Radishl
Guest

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby Radishl » Fri Nov 28, 2014 9:33 am

AirSeus wrote:Hey, I have submitted a level about a week ago, how come I have not been bolded?
ABOUT A WEEK AGO, WEEK AGO.

Jokes aside,the admins probably just forgot to bold it, I'm sure they have it.

RudeGuy
Bowser
Bowser
Posts: 4994
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:36 am
Flair: local guy

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby RudeGuy » Fri Nov 28, 2014 9:34 am

Kep wrote:But the .mp3 and .lvl are still in the folder, and that's the whole point of the rule: Leave them out.
Maybe have you tried putting only the folder in an archive and then opening the archive and copying the other things there?

Nickname wrote:> punishment too bad
That's exactly what they're going for. It's not that hard to do this the right way, and it gives extra work to all the people holding this. It's not a hard rule to follow, and that's why I think the -1 point is ok. They want to make people fear breaking the rule.
Also the contest judges should already take off points if a level is goo long/short/hard so a point reduction is unnecessary there.
Getting the score decreased by 1 is quite unfair, though. I think it should be just a 0.1 decrease.

underFlo
Wart
Wart
Posts: 4456
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:44 am
Flair: sup im lesbiab
Pronouns: They/She
Contact:

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby underFlo » Fri Nov 28, 2014 9:49 am

RudeGuy07 wrote:
Kep wrote:But the .mp3 and .lvl are still in the folder, and that's the whole point of the rule: Leave them out.
Maybe have you tried putting only the folder in an archive and then opening the archive and copying the other things there?

Nickname wrote:> punishment too bad
That's exactly what they're going for. It's not that hard to do this the right way, and it gives extra work to all the people holding this. It's not a hard rule to follow, and that's why I think the -1 point is ok. They want to make people fear breaking the rule.
Also the contest judges should already take off points if a level is goo long/short/hard so a point reduction is unnecessary there.
Getting the score decreased by 1 is quite unfair, though. I think it should be just a 0.1 decrease.
How is it unfair? It's not a hard rule to follow, and the punishment is bad so people follow it.

RudeGuy
Bowser
Bowser
Posts: 4994
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:36 am
Flair: local guy

Re: LC10 New Rule Will -1 Your Score if Broken, Read!!!

Postby RudeGuy » Fri Nov 28, 2014 9:53 am

The punishment is unfair, not the rule.


Return to “Level Contests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari