Super Mario Bros. X Forums

These were some graphics from my old SMW hack which I liked a lot and I thought would be good for people to use for SMBX too. So I thought why not export some of them here? It's nothing amazing but maybe some of you will find a use for it in your work.
I would recolor more stuff but that's too much work.



Be sure to read the credits in the content folders since there were some stuff I didn't make but included anyways.

Your graphics will never get old, reghrhre.

BTW, I thought you planned on updating this anymore, was that true?

I did plan on updating this, but that was back then when I made this, I kinda forgot about it over time and I don't really plan on updating this, and if I do it won't be any time soon

I like the brown cave tiles, they kinda look like chocolate covered in choco chips, can look good with a cave-candy mixed level thing.

YokoAnashiwa wrote:I like the brown cave tiles, they kinda look like chocolate covered in choco chips, can look good with a cave-candy mixed level thing.

You just bumped a outdated topic, can you stop that? its ok to bump 3 day old topics but this? COME ON!

As long as the post isn't useless or too simple, it's ok, I think.

h2643 wrote:As long as the post isn't useless or too simple, it's ok, I think.

But this was before he MADE IS GFX PACK!
still it starts to get annoying at least.

How come a GFX pack that is, outdated, undownloadable and made from a user outcast has gotten onto the fetured gfx?

well, i like the background and tileset. So maybe i can used it later. Good job.

Download link is broken.

Superiorstar wrote:

YokoAnashiwa wrote:I like the brown cave tiles, they kinda look like chocolate covered in choco chips, can look good with a cave-candy mixed level thing.

You just bumped a outdated topic, can you stop that? its ok to bump 3 day old topics but this? COME ON!

There is no firmly grounded threshold on what constitutes a bump. Post dates, page index number, and relevant content of the offending post aren't the only factors to consider if the bump is justified. I would also pay attention to the activity this subform gets with how frequent new topics are made and how many posts replying to those topics, as well as the special case where the staff features a user-submitted content, which then making a post in this topic to be acceptable for the most part in this case.

In fact, the only two posts here that weren't necessary is yours and Getlucky12341 because you are calling out someone who made an acceptable bump and the other is stating the obvious.

I seriously wonder why this is featured. Something from him was already featured and we all know he's gone. It's proberbly featured bc reghrhre made it even though you could give other people the chance who aren't wellknown here but thats just me.

CaptainSyrup wrote:I seriously wonder why this is featured. Something from him was already featured and we all know he's gone. It's proberbly featured bc reghrhre made it even though you could give other people the chance who aren't wellknown here but thats just me.

What's even sadder is that the staff didn't even check the download before it was featured because it's broken.

I actually think it was featured just because there haven't been any new big gfx packs released in the past month. Of course I agree that something more "recent" could be featured, and that it's maybe from a user who is still here.

How about Squishy Rex's then?

It has already been featured, and it would be if someone who had this GFX pack could post a link since it doesn't work :/

Someone that already have this pack before reghrhre excluded the download can re-post the pack again for download.

Here's the working download for various recolors, guys. Put this on the original thread if you would please, staff. Thanks in advance.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/s0mjnkqwt3hdr ... e.zip?dl=0

Yay, thank you kep, ive been wanting this for along time!

Mind = Blown
That's a really good graphic pack, dude. I might use it myself.