Something i would like to know

Mable · Postby **Mable** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:50 pm

Back in the months when reghrhre was admin here and had the forum link of mine and his forum Joey removed it because it wasn't cool for a admin supporting this.

But suddenly Ghosthawk is allowed to do so.

This is kinda unfair imo because reghrhre only had the link in it and it got removed without a warning. Ghosthawk has the link for a very long time now and no one removed it even though he is part of the staff.

I would like a explaination for this.

BTB · Postby **BTB** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:07 pm

yeah thats kinda unfair imo
maybe joey has just gotten cooler about shit like this? idk

Postby **Raster** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 2:13 pm

Dunno, probably users are more inclined to follow reghrhre because of community trends. On the other hand, GhostHawk promoting a forum wouldn't garner much activity for that forum...

I agree Joey should post an explanation for this.

Postby **Julia Pseudo** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 3:26 pm

Yeah, Joey should explain this for sure. Even if it was advertising for another forum, why should Joey be opposed to that? It would be like the NSMBX admins banning Chad or something from posting links to Knux's (where he was also an admin). It's just an alternative forum, I don't see the problem.

HeroOfRhyme · Postby **HeroOfRhyme** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 4:37 pm

usually if it's a link in the signature any other board would be okay with it, so i don't see why it wouldn't be allowed. reghrhe has the link in his sig now and it hasn't been removed.

reghrhre · Postby **reghrhre** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:36 pm

That's the thing though, when I was admin I had the link in my sig the whole time but it still got removed due to me being a staff member but GhostHawk has had a link to yours for awhile now and it hasn't been removed despite him being a staff member

HeroOfRhyme · Postby **HeroOfRhyme** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:49 pm

reghrhre wrote:That's the thing though, when I was admin I had the link in my sig the whole time but it still got removed due to me being a staff member but GhostHawk has had a link to yours for awhile now and it hasn't been removed despite him being a staff member

Maybe Joey grew balls. B)

qig · Postby **qig** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:50 pm

wow inconsistent moderation on a smbx forum
who would of thought

Postby **Raster** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:19 pm

qig wrote:wow inconsistent moderation on a smbx forum
who would of thought

You're not exactly helping either. :/

Postby **aero** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:33 pm

I'm not sure about this since I didn't know reg had a link in his sig. Maybe this has to do with me not linking to another SMBX forum? Idk, I'll ask Joey if he hasn't seen this thread yet.

Postby **Shadow Yoshi** » Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:18 am

Removing reghrhre's link from his signature was a mistake on my part in the first place.

For what it's worth, though, the link GhostHawk has in his signature isn't really as much of an SMBX forum as the one reghrhre has in his signature. Still, though, what Knux said is pretty much correct - I removed reghrhre's because I wanted to make sure the activity that was drawn into this place wouldn't be lost (and that people would blindly follow reghrhre into that forum). That was also many months ago, but yeah, it wasn't the best decision on my part.

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:59 pm

To be honest, you're still quite stupid to think that an administrator would influence all of your activity onto that forum.

Postby **Raster** » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:03 pm

8bitmushroom wrote:To be honest, you're still quite stupid to think that an administrator would influence all of your activity onto that forum.

He already said it was a mistake.

Mable · Postby **Mable** » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:23 pm

I understand it was one but the forum doesn't have a lot of activity anyway since most people either just spend their time here.

But okay this somehow solves the stuff.

Postby **aero** » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:27 pm

8bitmushroom wrote:To be honest, you're still quite stupid to think that an administrator would influence all of your activity onto that forum.

That's not entirely true. I mean, it's kind of hard to blame someone for not wanting traffic to be lost to yet another SMBX forum, especially during the early stages of this board. Was it overreacting? Sure. Stupid? Not really.

Mable · Postby **Mable** » Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:34 pm

GhostHawk wrote:
8bitmushroom wrote:To be honest, you're still quite stupid to think that an administrator would influence all of your activity onto that forum.
That's not entirely true. I mean, it's kind of hard to blame someone for not wanting traffic to be lost to yet another SMBX forum, especially during the early stages of this board. Was it overreacting? Sure. Stupid? Not really.

Uhm.... i said the forum me and reghrhre have didn't had a lot of activity it was kinda stupid to think just because reghrhre did it means automatically everyone would left. No one would because people liked this place.

Now do as i said and lock this u people can argue on the chat.