Re: Gay Marriage
Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 9:57 am
"Gay" is a commonly accepted term for both male and female homosexuality, and this topic pertains to both genders.
It may be acceptable for the society, but technically, gay refers only to men.Joey wrote:"Gay" is a commonly accepted term for both male and female homosexuality, and this topic pertains to both genders.
Nope actually it's referred for both men and wimemNatsu wrote:It may be acceptable for the society, but technically, gay refers only to men.Joey wrote:"Gay" is a commonly accepted term for both male and female homosexuality, and this topic pertains to both genders.
Yeah I understand. I was shocked when I heard it could be used for men and wimen.Natsu wrote:Oh, so it has changed ... again ... ??
I'm feel I might have a brain attack sooner or later.

CMIIW, but I'm pretty sure he was saying "Being gay doesn't equal getting married"Joey wrote:This is the part where I reiterate:Maruiki wrote:I believe people choose homosexuality. That's just what I believe, many people disagree.
I'm a Chrisitan. We believe that men and women were meant for each other. I know what you're thinking. "Hey, Maruiki, don't Christians believe that homosexuality is a sin?"
Yes, we do. However, we don't judge others. That's all I really have to say about gay marrige. I hope you respect my opinion as I respect yours.
Gay marriage != being gay != gay sex.
I don't know what sect of Christianity you practice (so if you could tell me, that'd be cool), but I do know that Catholicism runs with the belief that "we understand that people can have homosexual tendencies [being gay], but Leviticus says that 'one man may not lay with another man' [gay sex]". The separation of this is important.
So, as someone who obviously isn't gay, what brings you to believe that it's a choice? Is that just something you were taught? It's a choice to have gay sex, sure, but is it the same with being gay (let's just define being gay as liking guys instead of girls)?
Moving on from Maruiki's post, the gay marriage debate stems from our mostly-Christian roots as a country. We went ahead and institutionalized marriage instead of just leaving it to the churches, and tacked on a bunch of legal benefits. While the legal benefits aren't bad, we should just drop marriage from our legal system entirely and just support civil unions between anyone that is in love and wants it.
Joey wrote:but I do know that Catholicism runs with the belief that
please dontIce wrote:wimem
That was my point originally. I've noticed that people refrain from using the word "sex" when referring to gay marriage, because I never hear them say "homosexual" or "same-sex", it's always "gay".Natsu wrote:It may be acceptable for the society, but technically, gay refers only to men.Joey wrote:"Gay" is a commonly accepted term for both male and female homosexuality, and this topic pertains to both genders.
Not sure if sexist, sarcastic, or you truly don't know how to spell the word "women". Even so, you should notice the spell check error when you typed in "wimem" and "wimen" the first time around.Ice wrote:I was shocked when I heard it could be used for wimen.
Smiling at someone and calling yourself their friend while you reject that they should have the same rights and freedoms as you is probably the weirdest way to respect someone I've ever seen.Maruiki wrote:Personally, I do not support gay marrige. However, I do respect homosexuals. They're human beings, and I don't believe in hate.
If you're gay, I'll still be your friend. Honestly, I don't care. I don't HATE you, I just don't support gay marrige.
I don't reject the fact the fact the that they have the same rights and freedoms as I do. I even stating that I respect them because they're human being as well.Magician wrote:Etymologically the word "gay" has nothing to do with gender or sexuality. I think it was intended to describe male homosexuality, but that has since changed. I believe Ellen Page, for example, used the word "gay" when describing herself, to ensuing cheers. Considering that, it seems that the gay community believes it's acceptable to use.
Smiling at someone and calling yourself their friend while you reject that they should have the same rights and freedoms as you is probably the weirdest way to respect someone I've ever seen.Maruiki wrote:Personally, I do not support gay marrige. However, I do respect homosexuals. They're human beings, and I don't believe in hate.
If you're gay, I'll still be your friend. Honestly, I don't care. I don't HATE you, I just don't support gay marrige.
Well, you treat him like every other friend of yours except for that you might oppose him getting married to someone he loved.Maruiki wrote:I don't reject the fact the fact the that they have the same rights and freedoms as I do. I even stating that I respect them because they're human being as well.Magician wrote:Etymologically the word "gay" has nothing to do with gender or sexuality. I think it was intended to describe male homosexuality, but that has since changed. I believe Ellen Page, for example, used the word "gay" when describing herself, to ensuing cheers. Considering that, it seems that the gay community believes it's acceptable to use.
Smiling at someone and calling yourself their friend while you reject that they should have the same rights and freedoms as you is probably the weirdest way to respect someone I've ever seen.Maruiki wrote:Personally, I do not support gay marrige. However, I do respect homosexuals. They're human beings, and I don't believe in hate.
If you're gay, I'll still be your friend. Honestly, I don't care. I don't HATE you, I just don't support gay marrige.
I have a bisexual friend, and I treat him like every other friend of mine.
This is an important enough issue to me that I think it's worth a try.Natsu wrote:Besides, he's sharing his opinion, you guys are mostly like trying to change that, and that won't happen.
Either way, that's your opinion.Knux wrote:Yeah, but there are a lot of fallacies in what he's saying.Natsu wrote:Besides, he's sharing his opinion, you guys are mostly like trying to change that, and that won't happen.
He just thinks people choose to be gay. That's not a fallacy, nor are fallacies even relevant in the first place.Knux wrote:Yeah, but there are a lot of fallacies in what he's saying.Natsu wrote:Besides, he's sharing his opinion, you guys are mostly like trying to change that, and that won't happen.