Re: Gay Marriage

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 4:47 am

lighthouse64 wrote:R all of you 4 homosexuallness...

Forgot to answer your question here. (Also, It's "Are," not "R") Does it matter if they're homosexual or not? Does it directly affect you? No? It doesn't? Are you just here to judge them because of their sexual preferences? It seems so.

lighthouse64 wrote:Really... You really think the bible is outdated. Man... r u trying to be mean???!!!

But it is outdated, and it's revisions make it no better as it heavily impairs the original manuscript. Also, you might want to read an English Dictionary alongside your little bible there, because it's "are" and "you", they're actual words! Not letters! Wow, think about that! Also, I'm not being mean at all, you're misinterpreting me saying the bible is outdated (which it is!) as something mean-spirited, which is not what I'm trying to accomplish. If you want me to be mean, I will gratefully bash the bible and your religion if you would like, but I'm fairly certain that would garner me a punishment and a few unsatisfactory replies, eh?

Postby **Shadow Yoshi** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:33 am

It's only possible for the Bible to be outdated in the parts you're meant to take literally.

Which is...not all of it.

TLtimelord · Postby **TLtimelord** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:37 am

lighthouse64 wrote:I actually look at the bible and it says that homosexualness is bad. R all of you 4 homosexuallness...

"OH I HATE HOMOSEXUALITY IT'S BAD BECAUSE BIBLE AND YOU GUYS MIGHT BE HOMO BECAUSE YOU SUPPORT THEM."

Here's your opinion through my eyes. Honestly, I wish I had the patience to read the whole Bible and enlighten myself, but I know enough to tell you it shouldn't be your only source of "facts" to use and bash an entire group of people and what they do.

Postby **Shadow Yoshi** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:36 am

Anyone who uses the Bible to bash an entire group of people and what they do isn't using the Bible correctly in the first place.

Postby **Raster** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 11:51 am

Obviously the writings are really archaic, so I don't think we can use them as reference today. With that said, the Bible isn't necessarily all wrong, but you can't just take a piece of really old writing and use it as factual evidence to support your argument and malign an entire group of people.

Bomber57 · Postby **Bomber57** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 2:28 pm

lighthouse64 wrote:
8bitmushroom wrote:
lighthouse64 wrote:I actually look at the bible and it says that homosexualness is bad. R all of you 4 homosexuallness...
Yes, but the bible is full of lies and deceit. Some things are outrageous laws to abide by (men shall not shave their beards? Seriously?) and other things have been debunked through scientific means. The bible is extremely outdated and it's revisions over the thousands of years it has existed are all flawed due to the fact that the writers of those revisions have altered specific things in the bible. Your only reason for hating on homosexuals is the fact that, oh, you've read the bible! Everything in the bible speaks the truth!

See, in all honesty, I hate the people that are deep believers in what the bible has to say. Homosexuality isn't bad, nor is it against the words in the bible apparently, so there's no reason to hate homosexuals.
Really... You really think the bible is outdated. Man... r u trying to be mean???!!!

If you take the Bible literally you aren't thinking straight.

TheLordKhon · Postby **TheLordKhon** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 2:34 pm

Bomber57 wrote:
lighthouse64 wrote:
8bitmushroom wrote: Yes, but the bible is full of lies and deceit. Some things are outrageous laws to abide by (men shall not shave their beards? Seriously?) and other things have been debunked through scientific means. The bible is extremely outdated and it's revisions over the thousands of years it has existed are all flawed due to the fact that the writers of those revisions have altered specific things in the bible. Your only reason for hating on homosexuals is the fact that, oh, you've read the bible! Everything in the bible speaks the truth!

See, in all honesty, I hate the people that are deep believers in what the bible has to say. Homosexuality isn't bad, nor is it against the words in the bible apparently, so there's no reason to hate homosexuals.
Really... You really think the bible is outdated. Man... r u trying to be mean???!!!
If you take the Bible literally you aren't thinking straight.

some sheeps need their shepherd

Panda · Postby **Panda** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:26 pm

lighthouse64 wrote:Really... You really think the bible is outdated. Man... r u trying to be mean???!!!

Okay then, say it isn't outdated..or ridiculous for that matter. Let's use Leviticus (where most homophobes believe passage 18:22 means "OH MAN GAY PEOPLE ARE BAD" when in fact i've already explained how it is misinterpreted) as an example. I'm going to post 3 ridiculous and obviously outdated things and show you how dumb it really is.

1. God shuns those with disabilities
No man who has any defect may come near: no man who is blind or lame, disfigured or deformed; 19 no man with a crippled foot or hand, 20 or who is a hunchback or a dwarf, or who has any eye defect, or who has festering or running sores or damaged testicles. (Leviticus 21:16-23)
God basically tells Moses that anyone with a disability isn’t worthy enough to “come near to offer the food of his God.” Essentially, the blind, deaf, paralysed or... the ones with damaged testicles?... are disowned. Isn't he nice? They say God put people with disabilities on this Earth, so why would he shun them? Now that's just silly.

2. You're not allowed to wear clothes made from two materials.
You shall keep my statutes. You shall not let your cattle breed with a different kind. You shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed, nor shall you wear a garment of cloth made of two kinds of material. (Leviticus 19:19)
Basically, cross-breeding animals (eg: like the cattle ranchers did back in the US in the 1800s), planting more than one crop type in a field, or wearing clothes made from, say, cotton and polyester is wrong and you're going to Hell (or whatever punishment was given for that, I don't know tbh)!!11!

3. Cutting your hair at the sides or trimming your beard is wrong.
Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard. (Leviticus 19:27)
Does this even need explaining? If you cut your hair at the temples or trim your beard, you're a sinner.

If you take only one quote from Leviticus literally and claim the rest are bullshit, then NONE of it is reliable and it's ALL bullshit. If you say "Well the rest are dumb but I can use Leviticus 18:22 as a reason to justify my hate!!" then you have a double standard and need to visit a proctologist to get your head removed from your arse.

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:34 pm

Intellectual-Panda wrote:2. You're not allowed to wear clothes made from two materials.
You shall keep my statutes. You shall not let your cattle breed with a different kind. You shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed, nor shall you wear a garment of cloth made of two kinds of material. (Leviticus 19:19)
Basically, cross-breeding animals (eg: like the cattle ranchers did back in the US in the 1800s), planting more than one crop type in a field, or wearing clothes made from, say, cotton and polyester is wrong and you're going to Hell (or whatever punishment was given for that, I don't know tbh)!!11!

3. Cutting your hair at the sides or trimming your beard is wrong.
Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard. (Leviticus 19:27)
Does this even need explaining? If you cut your hair at the temples or trim your beard, you're a sinner.

What's funny with these laws is the fact that most (or in my town, at least) Christian schools require students to wear a school uniform that consists of wool and cotton, and boys' hair must be cut to a reasonable length, which I think is not past the neck. They stated these changes in the local morning paper, and those guidelines haven't changed in a while.

I guess they're placing sin upon themselves for the sake of going to a school. Not my problem though.

FanofSMBX · Postby **FanofSMBX** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:37 pm

8bitmushroom wrote:
Intellectual-Panda wrote:2. You're not allowed to wear clothes made from two materials.
You shall keep my statutes. You shall not let your cattle breed with a different kind. You shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed, nor shall you wear a garment of cloth made of two kinds of material. (Leviticus 19:19)
Basically, cross-breeding animals (eg: like the cattle ranchers did back in the US in the 1800s), planting more than one crop type in a field, or wearing clothes made from, say, cotton and polyester is wrong and you're going to Hell (or whatever punishment was given for that, I don't know tbh)!!11!

3. Cutting your hair at the sides or trimming your beard is wrong.
Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard. (Leviticus 19:27)
Does this even need explaining? If you cut your hair at the temples or trim your beard, you're a sinner.
What's funny with these laws is the fact that most (or in my town, at least) Christian schools require students to wear a school uniform that consists of wool and cotton, and boys' hair must be cut to a reasonable length, which I think is not past the neck. They stated these changes in the local morning paper, and those guidelines haven't changed in a while.

I guess they're placing sin upon themselves for the sake of going to a school. Not my problem though.

UGH HAIR RULES
that's one of the reasons I left my former school
in fact that's the reason I jokingly say that boys can't have long hair

Postby **Magna** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:41 pm

FanofSMBX wrote:in fact that's the reason I jokingly say that boys can't have long hair

Just a thought, but are you against Jews, you know, with their long hair?

TheLordKhon · Postby **TheLordKhon** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:45 pm

Blue Greed wrote:
FanofSMBX wrote:in fact that's the reason I jokingly say that boys can't have long hair
Just a thought, but are you against Jews, you know, with their long hair?

prepare for the downreps

Postby **Magna** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:45 pm

TheLordKhon wrote:
Blue Greed wrote:
FanofSMBX wrote:in fact that's the reason I jokingly say that boys can't have long hair
Just a thought, but are you against Jews, you know, with their long hair?
prepare for the downreps

jes, I'm a magnet sort-of aren't I?

ragont · Postby **ragont** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:48 pm

Blue Greed wrote: jes, I'm a magnet sort-of aren't I?

maybe you should consider thinking out your posts instead of making outright uneducated statements, then.

Postby **Magna** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:48 pm

Okay, okay, FoS, are you against the Jews who have the long-hair? Like the religious ones, no need to down-rep.

TheLordKhon · Postby **TheLordKhon** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:49 pm

Blue Greed wrote:Okay, okay, FoS, are you against the Jews who have the long-hair? Like the religious ones, no need to down-rep.

i have found new home for you
http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism
enjoy

FanofSMBX · Postby **FanofSMBX** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:50 pm

I said I was AGAINST forcing people to have short hair.

Postby **Julia Pseudo** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:46 pm

Ooh I can't imagine going to a school that would force you to have short hair that'd be awful. Actually I can imagine it because I used to go to one, but I didn't have long hair at the time. I grow mine down to my shoulders these days, by the way (my avatar's hair is supposed to look like my own).

Garro · Postby **Garro** » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:50 am

I'm just gonna leave this here

Mable · Postby **Mable** » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:38 pm

Blue Greed wrote:Okay, okay, FoS, are you against the Jews who have the long-hair? Like the religious ones, no need to down-rep.

> Said Gays are useless in Chat
>> Creates dupe
>>> asked if fos is agains jews
>>>> Racist kinda.