Postby Enjl » Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:02 pm
As someone who only very occasionally plays mario tennis aces online and nothing else, this basically locks me out of the experience unless I pay another 33% of the game's price or very specifically plan my online sessions to be within a specific month.
I don't care about NES games.
I don't care about cloud saves (Splatoon 2 players certainly do, however).
What I'd be getting is the same thing I already had access to but now for $20 and with less potential opponents because the player base shrunk.
Nintendo's been trying a system of slowly delivering content for released products over time in an effort to maintain a long-term playerbase. Mario Tennis Aces and ARMS started out with very little content and only over time grew to be worth their money. I don't think this is the kind of strategy that should be applied in this type of service. It should be worth $20 per year from the get-go, not after a year when they announce something new that isn't an add-on to the NES library.
Some fun games that would be totally rad with multiplayer which would make that VC worth it:
Super Mario Kart (or any retro Mario Kart for that matter).
Any N64 Mario Party.
Zelda: 4 Swords GBA
Kirby and the Amazing Mirror
At least I can gather 7 friends and we can get a family membership to pay $35 dollars rather than $160 individually. For me that'll have to wait until a solid reason to cave in though. Probably Smash.
For now, though, time to unearth my 3DS and play Mario Kart 7.