Mario Builder and Mario Game Master

[Dersen]

Will I be told by the + and - of these games? (pluses & minuses)
I did not check if it's a good category, so how bad is it to move ;/

[Westretroman]

Mario Builder has more npcs, seperate titlescreen, but has features that SMBX has like custom world map, custom music, custom tilesets, but no custom npcs and a text box that can only be used by itself.
Mario Game Master is cool, can use custom music, but the rest from there on is a Mario editor as listed, but doesn't support custom graphics and interface is not that great.
In conclusion, these games were gold, Mario Builder was the main one I checked out in the old days, but they are outdated nowadays and haven't aged as well, unless you are looking to make some levels on it, then be my guest.

[TheNewGuy]

I prefer SMBX and mario editor

[3lectronstar024]

I prefer SMBX, Mario Builder, and Mario Editor. They are better.

[smoke40]

I prefer SMBX over Builder mostly because I don't like the physics of MB. I'm also not too familiar with the editor so idk about that. And I have never tried Editor.

[FireyPaperMario]

I prefer these builders:

• SMBX

• Super Smash Bros. Brawl & Super Smash Bros. for WiiU stage builders

[PixelPest]

I prefer these builders:

• SMBX

• Super Smash Bros. Brawl & Super Smash Bros. for WiiU stage builders

These kinds of responses (you're not the only one in this topic either) don't really contribute to what the OP appears to be trying to discuss

[slovakxolotl]

*deleted comment*
i cant find the delete button lol

[Core]

SMBX is definitely better than both, by physics and content. I'd say i prefer Mario Builder more than Mario Game Master, interface is more pleasant, idk.