Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Danny's defense is relatively fair but I still don't really trust him.
On the other hand, I noticed how RSuper has only made 1 post that's actually contributive. I am not saying that she is suspicious, lynch-worthy or anything, just noting the fact that she is really inactive.

The thing is that we really need to find a lead though, since we only have 2 mislynches left, so lynching an inactive player might just bring us closer to being defeated by the mafia.

I've been observing the posts of the players who are still alive and from my perspective, Nanaya Jacob's posts are giving me relatively bad vibes.

I suggest to have some interrogation with Danny and/or Jacob, but rather Jacob in my opinion. Danny has given a decent defense so interrogation isn't all too necessary with him. And about Jacob, I have a hunch on him but I don't think that it's solid enough to place a vote on him yet.

So, I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.

Honestly I don't know who is suspicious. Danny has defended himself quite well. I don't know what is making Nanaya Jacob suspicious however.

I was inactive because I don't know what to fudge with most messages from last phase.
Unfortunately, I didn't find anyone whose suspicious even I read the whole messages like a couple times so I'm guessing not only interrogations will deal with it though (I think suspecting is the same thing).

Electriking wrote:Honestly I don't know who is suspicious. Danny has defended himself quite well. I don't know what is making Nanaya Jacob suspicious however.

It's just a minor hunch and the fact that he's been quite doubtful. But now that I think about it, he is always this doubtful so this gut feeling is probably not a good way to go.

I really do not want to lynch Danny. But I'm afraid that we will end up doing exactly that if we don't find a proper lead. So far I have been unable to provide one but we shouldnt give up.

Witchking666 wrote:I really do not want to lynch Danny. But I'm afraid that we will end up doing exactly that if we don't find a proper lead. So far I have been unable to provide one but we shouldnt give up.

Hey jackass you were the guy that said you were going to do everything to not get me lynched and that you were working really hard to find a "better lead". Looks like I've been misconstrued.

I'm not even remotely sure why you guys are still talking about lynching me, because I've given my full defense and there's nothing more to say about it, yet you're still parading around the idea of lynching me because of why? There's nothing more you're getting out of me from interrogating me because there's nothing left for me to say. Remember, we only have a certain number of chances left before we completely lose, so do you really think lynching me off is a good idea.

I want to set an example and have you guys find a different, better lead. Given my current reputation, I can't be the one to do it, so good luck.

Danny

Danny wrote:I want to set an example and have you guys find a different, better lead. Given my current reputation, I can't be the one to do it, so good luck.

Danny

Honestly, I think five people should interogate everyone. Four if you are one. This way, the mafia can not sneak in and try to do it.

I don't think it matters who interrogates who specifically. If someone gets a good lead, then they get a good lead.

Honestly, Danny doesn't seem like a good option for me and the conclusion I came to is that Waddle Derp has been rather quiet. In this particular game, that strategy does not really help the town under any circumstances and I find it rather odd that he's barely even trying, at least from how I see it. True I agree that Danny's reasoning wasn't really the best.

So, here is my vote placed on Waddle Derp since voting is forced and I cannot really come up with anything better as of now.

If somebody is doubtful about this, reply ASAP to avoid lynching an innocent.

I actually agree with Waddle Derp for now.

Since I have to vote, I'm going to put a completely baseless vote on Electriking. I'll probably change it when we have a lead.

ShadowStarX seems like he's been oddly quiet up until making this vote against Waddle Derp, whose name was largely cleared yesterday. Seems a bit suspicious.

Pseudo wrote:ShadowStarX seems like he's been oddly quiet up until making this vote against Waddle Derp, whose name was largely cleared yesterday. Seems a bit suspicious.

The reason I voted for Waddle Derp is that the only posts he made were related to defending himself and nothing else. He didn't contribute at all besides that and he's been rather quiet, which is something that WD tends to do as scum.

I agree on the fact that Danny's reasoning wasn't all that good against him, though.

I made my vote to clear Danny.

Even waddle deep is an option, why are these votes on these people?

Even though I mean

huh, I wasn't expecting that. Shadowstar, you've been "suspicious" of people left and right this game trying to start something and this vote out of nowhere is just another example of the fact that you seem a little desperate to get someone killed or to get the attention off yourself. ShadowstarX.

Wait what the fuck? What were you thinking ShadowStarX?