Super Mario Bros. X Forums

It's a KitB!

The day went rather quietly for a while but in the late afternoon, glitch4 and Sanct started a rather hectic fight which resulted in serious injuries. Neither of them could overpower the other. Mechdragon and Lukas were rooting for Sanct's victory meanwhile Pseudo and TheDinoKing decided to side with glitch4. In the

In the end, glitch4 was executed in the town's square.

It is now Night 4. Day 4 will begin at 9 PM CEST on August 16.

Well to be honest it was his own god damn fault

Well, I hope Sanct is not evil.

Great freaking job guys. Also, I was silenced if it wasn't obvious enough

He had no business playing the thoughtlessly

But we do need to hatch a plan now. Don't let this phase go by quietly, especially at this point it's a bit more serious

Jesus H, this should NOT have happened. Mild suspicion on Sanct for blatantly revenge-voting.

Yeah well I just really didn't feel like dying for no reason.

That's a bad luck to lose a blue. We also lose glitch4 as he's "likely" a dissector.
Since we loose three blues right now. And 2 oranges died. Unfortunately, I don't know who are they soo...

Sanct wrote:Yeah well I just really didn't feel like dying for no reason.

Sucks to die, but it would've sucked less for you to die than an effectively confirmed blue.

Hey, I was out for the day, and apparently the alliance mouthpiece was lynched. Well, I kinda suspect Sanct, he could have easily taken the opportunity to set up a lynch vote for glitch4

If the alliance mouthpiece is going to try to set up votes in the last hour of the phase without notifying anyone and claim the reasons he claimed (Which meant he could've also set up the lynch at the beginning of the phase), I'd be worried about who you're using as your mouthpiece.

Sanct wrote:If the alliance mouthpiece is going to try to set up votes in the last hour of the phase without notifying anyone and claim the reasons he claimed (Which meant he could've also set up the lynch at the beginning of the phase), I'd be worried about who you're using as your mouthpiece.

I actually agree with that. That is usually a mafia tactic.

glitch4 may have not made the best decisions, but he was blue and the fact that you're still trying to justify a revenge vote instead of admitting that it was the wrong decision gives me a bad feeling, Sanct.

Pseudo wrote:glitch4 may have not made the best decisions, but he was blue and the fact that you're still trying to justify a revenge vote instead of admitting that it was the wrong decision gives me a bad feeling, Sanct.

Should we vote Sanct tomorrow then? I am a little confused. Especially with glitch4's actions.

I am up for voting Sanct tomorrow for the reasons Pseudo stated

thehelmetguy1 wrote:I am up for voting Sanct tomorrow for the reasons Pseudo stated

let's hope we even get a mafia.

That sounds like as good of a lead as any

I am rather uncertain about whether Sanct is a mafia or not. In my eyes, he never truely did anything suspicous besides what happend on day 3. He was defending himself against glitch4's "claims" which he then debunked. So ofcourse Sanct had the reflex to defend himself. Personally, I think both were at fault for what happend as glitch4 basicly engaged Sanct through not being really careful, but Sanct took it too far with the revenge-voting. So I don't really know who I should trust at this point.

Revenge voting is often an act of desperation, and it is clear that Sanct was desperate there

thehelmetguy1 wrote:Revenge voting is often an act of desperation, and it is clear that Sanct was desperate there

I'm not defending sanct, but maybe he did it to save himself from being lynched for no good reason, that's the reason I made a revenge vote in M39. Everyone just say around when 101 voted me and I really didn't feel like dying like that, which is why I did.