Super Mario Bros. X Forums

level link: http://www.filedropper.com/mine_2

screenshot: https://snag.gy/pkPyHl.jpg

Doesntpostverymuch wrote:level link: http://www.filedropper.com/mine_2

screenshot: https://snag.gy/pkPyHl.jpg

It's not that often you see vanilla levels these days.

About the level itself, there's not much of anything. Just a few landmass with enemies and 4 pits. The level can be done in 10 seconds if it was completable.
Did you even test your level?

The level was really short and easy.

that was the point

i mean to be short and easy

update: forgot warp zone edited level here: http://www.filedropper.com/mine_3

I honestly don't think short means, like, 10 seconds long. I mean, not even MNIE52's levels were this short!

if we're fair, it takes longer if you go and hit the question mark block

Doesntpostverymuch wrote:if we're fair, it takes longer if you go and hit the question mark block

But why would you even do that in the first place? The level is already easy enough as it is, and even if you do, it's still incredibly short.

Yeah, it's not really supposed to be long, but i thought it'd be longer, probably because i don't hold the run button and like to take my time.

Doesntpostverymuch wrote:Yeah, it's not really supposed to be long, but i thought it'd be longer, probably because i don't hold the run button and like to take my time.

That's not how you test your levels.

So I guess he Doesntpostverymuch level

TheDinoKing wrote:

Doesntpostverymuch wrote:level link: http://www.filedropper.com/mine_2

screenshot: https://snag.gy/pkPyHl.jpg

It's not that often you see vanilla levels these days.

About the level itself, there's not much of anything. Just a few landmass with enemies and 4 pits. The level can be done in 10 seconds if it was completable.
Did you even test your level?

Looks way too easy & SHORT. Try making it a little more challenging.

Here is a suggestion don't make a level with only 2 enemies 1 type of block and that can be finished in 10 seconds.
Sorry 2 blocks I forgot about the wood blocks.

DJFMHD wrote:Here is a suggestion don't make a level with only 2 enemies 1 type of block and that can be finished in 10 seconds.
Sorry 2 blocks I forgot about the wood blocks.

There is nothing wrong with using only 1 block or 1 enemy. Gameplay matters most. But definitely 10 seconds means the level is pretty shit, and I do believe DPVM did not test this.

Electriking wrote:There is nothing wrong with using only 1 block or 1 enemy. Gameplay matters most. But definitely 10 seconds means the level is pretty shit, and I do believe DPVM did not test this.

Sort-lengthed level also doesn't matter. Puzzle Levels is one of short-lengthed but took long time to solve if you're confused with it. Still this level is short and the exit is just going to a pipe. It feels boring and lazy. If it's too long and the objects looped also makes it boring and lazy. That's what i think the level is bad.`

1AmPlayer wrote:

Electriking wrote:There is nothing wrong with using only 1 block or 1 enemy. Gameplay matters most. But definitely 10 seconds means the level is pretty shit, and I do believe DPVM did not test this.

Sort-lengthed level also doesn't matter. Puzzle Levels is one of short-lengthed but took long time to solve if you're confused with it. Still this level is short and the exit is just going to a pipe. It feels boring and lazy. If it's too long and the objects looped also makes it boring and lazy. That's what i think the level is bad.`

Levels that don't take long to beat are bad most of the time. If such a level is good, then it is likely a, speedrun level with a limited time limit.