Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 2:42 am
MaGLX has a better concept than the CCs. I think that the restrictions make people make way more creative levels (kinda like the SVLC 2k16, actually).
Super Mario Bros. X Forums
Forums for SMBX
https://www.smbxgame.com/forums/
Your controversial SMBX opinion
Page 6 of 22
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:16 am
Is there a rule about the lenght of the level or it can be as long as we want it?
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:25 am
The general rule of thumb is that if you get bored designing/playing the level, even after having done it for a very long time, it's too long.diamantico21 wrote:Is there a rule about the lenght of the level or it can be as long as we want it?
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:24 am
If a level contains gameplay around 10 minutes worth or longer, then most likely it's too long. The player wants to enjoy the level without getting tired and bored of it.
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:22 pm
I just noticed I posted this in the wrong topic...diamantico21 wrote:Is there a rule about the lenght of the level or it can be as long as we want it?
It's not even an opinion...
Can someone delete this and the other thing i quoted?
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 11:15 am
A non-linear level should consist of many different paths that lead to the goal rather than random switches.
And I think the music choice is more important than custom graphics... (Gen 2, anyone?)
And I think the music choice is more important than custom graphics... (Gen 2, anyone?)
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:45 pm
Personally I prefer Gen 4 because I'm blinded by nostalgia, but a lot of my favorites are from Gen 5, which I blame on there being so many new Pokémon introduced lmaoEnjl wrote:Gen5 is my favourite!
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:50 pm
Mine are usually around 1 or 2 minute SMB3 length levels.Zeldamaster12 wrote:If a level contains gameplay around 10 minutes worth or longer, then most likely it's too long. The player wants to enjoy the level without getting tired and bored of it.
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 11:55 pm
I can't get into pokemon that isn't pokemon stadium.Marina wrote:Personally I prefer Gen 4 because I'm blinded by nostalgia, but a lot of my favorites are from Gen 5, which I blame on there being so many new Pokémon introduced lmaoEnjl wrote:Gen5 is my favourite!
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:49 am
This isn't the Pokemon thread.
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:41 pm
I hate it whens mods break good topic cycles. It leaves me with an empty feeling.
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:24 pm
Same, it feels really empty and disappointing.
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 4:06 am
No controversial SMBX opinions so far, whatever those are. I need an example or something because everything so far is just different preferences about design and other aesthetic junk.
aesthetic junk is best junk ~(˘▾˘~)
aesthetic junk is best junk ~(˘▾˘~)
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 4:45 pm
If you need a controversial opinion, then I have oneAeroMatter wrote:No controversial SMBX opinions so far, whatever those are. I need an example or something because everything so far is just different preferences about design and other aesthetic junk.
Spoiler: show
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 3:46 pm
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 3:57 pm
I agree. That game is just way too buggy to be closed source IMO.TheDinoKing432 wrote:Yoshi021 wrote:If you need a controversial opinion, then I have oneAeroMatter wrote:No controversial SMBX opinions so far, whatever those are. I need an example or something because everything so far is just different preferences about design and other aesthetic junk.
Spoiler: showSpoiler: show
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 8:36 am
WARNING!!! VERY UNPOPULAR OPINION PLS DON'T READ IF YOU DON'T WANT TO HATE or KILL ME!!!
Spoiler: show
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 8:41 am
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 8:43 am
That's actually a very popular opinionCamacho wrote:People being hate levels with overload BGOs like my SVLC level
Re: Your controversial SMBX opinion
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 8:47 am
yep it's very accurate
And one thing :
People being love Linear levels than non-linear levels.
People don't like underwater level(s) just because too many maneuver movements.
And one thing :
People being love Linear levels than non-linear levels.
People don't like underwater level(s) just because too many maneuver movements.