Page 1 of 9

horikawa pls make a rule about signature usage

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:59 am
by Alagirez
yay i made it in top 30 now give me the medal pls
holy horikawa

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 7:04 am
by lighthouse64
lol. I guess it's that image of squishy rex which adds to the height of my sig :P

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 7:08 am
by Zipper
what the hell was the point of this

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 7:14 am
by underFlo
I'm glad to have been the inspiration for this.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 7:36 am
by MECHDRAGON777
How am I not on this if my signature is the largest on the forums?

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 7:59 am
by HeroLinik
MECHDRAGON777 wrote:How am I not on this if my signature is the largest on the forums?
Because yours is covered in spoilers.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 8:09 am
by MECHDRAGON777
Linik wrote:
MECHDRAGON777 wrote:How am I not on this if my signature is the largest on the forums?
Because yours is covered in spoilers.
I giess that is what I get for Joey firce spoilering the first four immages in ny signiture? Still larger then some of these here. First place is the smallest one in that regard though.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 8:32 am
by HeroLinik
Horikawa Otane wrote:(Generally speaking the 80th-100th places or so are pretty okay, but the top 50 should seriously consider spoilering some stuff. I just wanted a nice, round number like 100)
What would you say about those in the top 10?
And also, 2000th post, yay.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:01 am
by RoundPiplup
Most of the time all I've been reading were signatures. I guess this is why I should expect this thread, as the signatures cover up more space than the posts themselves.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:08 am
by Darkonius Mavakar
I approve this topic

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:10 am
by underFlo
Wow what a BUTT just revealing my most intimate secrets!!

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:55 am
by snoruntpyro
I'm part of the "doesn't have a signature" club 83 woah i'm so cool and radicola and amazing and hippie #rekt #nailedit #pleasekillme

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:01 am
by h2643
too bad i'm not in the list #sadpandas #icrievrytiem

This is cool though!

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:21 am
by Zeldamaster12
reghrhre wrote:Good stuff

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:32 am
by RudeGuy
Horikawa Otane wrote:The inspiration of this thread was me browsing on an iPad Air and not being able to even fit some signatures on a full screen view.
That's nothing. Mechdragon's not spoilered signature (it wasn't spoilered at all before) couldn't even fit in the screen of my laptop.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:56 am
by TDK
It can always get worse.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 11:05 am
by Ness-Wednesday
Wow...
I have the 31rst biggest signature in this community?
I'm shocked since it is only just a image of Villagers and a small text.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:09 pm
by RoundPiplup
My signature is too short to even go past my profile side of the post. Unless if you click on the spoilers, but it's just some single gif there.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:23 pm
by HeroLinik
Well, I have just decreased the size of my signature. What do you think of it now?

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:39 pm
by Gameinsky
It's kind of funny and sad seeing this.
All of the top 100 are above 350 pixels in height, if this were pretty much every single other forums they would have all been removed by now xD
(I know the Terraria forums had a 250 pixels max height policy)
Which is this high:
Image