The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

For topics related to SuperMarioBrosX.org. Suggest anything that you would like to see on the site here.
Willhart
Banned
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:18 am

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Willhart » Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:40 pm

My signature is pretty small, but I still remember placing like 700th somethng or so. It proabably means that most of the people here don't have signatures.

Edit: The pokey below my avatar is kinf of expanding it though actually.
Last edited by Willhart on Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

RudeGuy
Fry Guy
Fry Guy
Posts: 4993
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:36 am
Flair: local guy

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby RudeGuy » Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:41 pm

MosaicMario wrote:I made my signature smaller by putting things in spoilers.
It's funny the fact that signatures with spoilered things like yours are still longer than mine, isn't it?

FanofSMBX
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 3878
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:01 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby FanofSMBX » Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:41 pm

Huh, I thought that my signature was huge. I guess that that's what using spoilers can do. I also guess that this means that Super Mario Uprising secretly isn't so bad after all.

lighthouse64
Charged Spiny
Charged Spiny
Posts: 1804
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 6:28 am

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby lighthouse64 » Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:03 pm

I responded to this topic... By increasing my sig size :p

Jdude60
Cheep-Cheep
Cheep-Cheep
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 1:13 am

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Jdude60 » Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:28 pm

not sure if it's a good thing or a bad thing that I made it on the list

PixelPest
Raccoon Mario
Raccoon Mario
Posts: 7111
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:38 pm
Flair: Tamer of Boom Booms
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby PixelPest » Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:30 pm

Jdude60 wrote:not sure if it's a good thing or a bad thing that I made it on the list
It's a bad thing. It means that your signature sucks.

Shadow Yoshi
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
Posts: 4291
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:56 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Shadow Yoshi » Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:45 pm

Yo, let's not be hostile toward users that have their names on the list.

Jdude60
Cheep-Cheep
Cheep-Cheep
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 1:13 am

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Jdude60 » Wed Feb 17, 2016 9:35 pm

PixelPest wrote:
Jdude60 wrote:not sure if it's a good thing or a bad thing that I made it on the list
It's a bad thing. It means that your signature sucks.
I'm aware of that

PixelPest
Raccoon Mario
Raccoon Mario
Posts: 7111
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:38 pm
Flair: Tamer of Boom Booms
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby PixelPest » Wed Feb 17, 2016 9:37 pm

Joey wrote:Yo, let's not be hostile toward users that have their names on the list.
Sorry Joey.

It means your signature is appalling.

Zeldamaster12
Cid
Cid
Posts: 4103
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:43 pm
Flair: stop looking at my flair dangit

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Zeldamaster12 » Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:04 pm

it's as if spoilers don't exist

Nanaya
Phanto
Phanto
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:52 pm
Flair: When's Mafia
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Nanaya » Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:33 pm

Still people put to many enters in there.signatures
I should personally reduce some of mine
Its mainly the enters, I'm not.even sure im on the list

Imaynotbehere4long
Boomerang Bro
Boomerang Bro
Posts: 1389
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:00 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Imaynotbehere4long » Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:58 am

Zeldamaster12 wrote:it's as if spoilers don't exist
You make fun of us, but your sig is only 4 pixels smaller than 100th place at the time of this post.

Mable
Ludwig
Ludwig
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Mable » Thu Feb 18, 2016 6:39 am

In honor of all the people, i completly removed my signature so there is no more bitching to me

Best avatar now

Metroidologist X7
Bit
Bit
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:35 pm
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Metroidologist X7 » Thu Feb 18, 2016 10:32 am

Damn! How can be possible that I am in the list?

<signature hidden>

Ness-Wednesday
Purple Yoshi Egg
Purple Yoshi Egg
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 3:50 pm
Flair: Diverse Scouts
Pronouns: He/Him

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Ness-Wednesday » Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:19 am

I spoilered my project, it dosen't really do hat much of a difference...

Mable
Ludwig
Ludwig
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Mable » Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:33 am

maybe you should spoiler the villager one also.

Shadow Yoshi
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
Posts: 4291
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:56 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Shadow Yoshi » Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:46 pm

To make it clear, nobody is required to change their signature just because it's listed in this thread. If we see a problem with your signature, we'll take care of it for you and then notify you about it.

Zeldamaster12
Cid
Cid
Posts: 4103
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:43 pm
Flair: stop looking at my flair dangit

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Zeldamaster12 » Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:01 pm

Imaynotbehere4long wrote:
Zeldamaster12 wrote:it's as if spoilers don't exist
You make fun of us, but your sig is only 4 pixels smaller than 100th place at the time of this post.
When and where did I ever make fun of anyone?

Ness-Wednesday
Purple Yoshi Egg
Purple Yoshi Egg
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 3:50 pm
Flair: Diverse Scouts
Pronouns: He/Him

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Ness-Wednesday » Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:27 pm

Tinkerbell wrote:maybe you should spoiler the villager one also.
But I love Villagers. :(
I do think it's a good idea as well, it has been there showing off ever since I joined.

Imaynotbehere4long
Boomerang Bro
Boomerang Bro
Posts: 1389
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:00 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Imaynotbehere4long » Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:01 pm

Zeldamaster12 wrote:
Imaynotbehere4long wrote:
Zeldamaster12 wrote:it's as if spoilers don't exist
You make fun of us, but your sig is only 4 pixels smaller than 100th place at the time of this post.
When and where did I ever make fun of anyone?
Okay, maybe my wording wasn't the best, but by saying "it's as if spoilers don't exist" in a thread ridiculing long signatures, it implies that you look down on people with long signatures, especially those who have text lists or large images that aren't in spoilers. I just wanted to point out that, despite your implied point of view, you only just barely didn't make the list yourself, making your post seem rather hypocritical.


Return to “SuperMarioBrosX.org”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari