The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

For topics related to SuperMarioBrosX.org. Suggest anything that you would like to see on the site here.
Zeldamaster12
Cid
Cid
Posts: 4103
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:43 pm
Flair: stop looking at my flair dangit

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Zeldamaster12 » Thu Feb 18, 2016 4:34 pm

Horikawa specifically said that every signature under number 50 isn't that bad, she just used 100 instead so the list would look cooler. I suggest you go back and read posts before you call me out on such a harmless comment.

mechamind
Eerie
Eerie
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:56 pm
Flair: You can set your mind to it!
Pronouns: He/Him/His

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby mechamind » Thu Feb 18, 2016 5:06 pm

Well, I guess I'll try harder next time.

TDK
Foo
Foo
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:26 pm
Flair: Retired

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby TDK » Thu Feb 18, 2016 5:31 pm

Well if someone wanted to make really terrible signature all they need to do is add the image code to make the worst signature in their signature.

CopyLeft
Volcano Lotus
Volcano Lotus
Posts: 537
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 2:47 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby CopyLeft » Thu Feb 18, 2016 6:21 pm

I'll test that signature, but only for a very short time, just to laugh at it.

Oh jeez, it's so big!

Alagirez
Boom Boom
Boom Boom
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 2:28 am
Flair: Show your fangs!
Pronouns: He/Him/That wolf
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Alagirez » Thu Feb 18, 2016 7:44 pm

Ok i was spoilered some stuffs in my signature. Update the list pls.....

The Thwomp King
Rip Van Fish
Rip Van Fish
Posts: 1257
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby The Thwomp King » Thu Feb 18, 2016 10:33 pm

Harvey36Dice wrote:Ok i was spoilered some stuffs in my signature. Update the list pls.....
Yeah an update would be nice.

Nanaya
Phanto
Phanto
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:52 pm
Flair: When's Mafia
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Nanaya » Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:04 pm

People really want good signatures
Just calm down jesus Christ its like it is the end of the world
Its just a thing that is scientific not like you have to make it smaller but it would be nice
Anyways you can relax and do whatever you want

Gameinsky
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 240
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:59 am

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Gameinsky » Fri Feb 19, 2016 7:50 am

Ness-Wednesday wrote:
Tinkerbell wrote:maybe you should spoiler the villager one also.
But I love Villagers. :(
I do think it's a good idea as well, it has been there showing off ever since I joined.
Another alternative is to simply make the image smaller. There's no need for it to be so big.

Mable
Ludwig
Ludwig
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Mable » Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:19 am

Zeldamaster12 wrote:Horikawa specifically said that every signature under number 50 isn't that bad, she just used 100 instead so the list would look cooler. I suggest you go back and read posts before you call me out on such a harmless comment.
You mean above 50

1-50 is the worst
51-89 ok
90-100 good.

ShadowLabrys101
Bit
Bit
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:14 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby ShadowLabrys101 » Sat Feb 20, 2016 8:39 am

Why, thank you!

MegaCDFan235
Monty Mole
Monty Mole
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 5:33 pm
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby MegaCDFan235 » Sat Feb 20, 2016 2:28 pm

I'm leaving these forums.
I quit.
Everyone is just going to insult me now.
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

Mable
Ludwig
Ludwig
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Mable » Sat Feb 20, 2016 2:40 pm

MegaCDFan235 wrote:I'm leaving these forums.
I quit.
Everyone is just going to insult me now.
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
What? If you acting like this it won't help you at all.

Nobody was insulting you. It's just that some people tend to have huge sigs, which take longer to load. Did you see anybody else getting hurted over something like that?

It's just a signature, nothing that matters in real life you shouldn't get hurt by that.

MegaCDFan235
Monty Mole
Monty Mole
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 5:33 pm
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby MegaCDFan235 » Sat Feb 20, 2016 2:46 pm

Tinkerbell wrote:
MegaCDFan235 wrote:I'm leaving these forums.
I quit.
Everyone is just going to insult me now.
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
What? If you acting like this it won't help you at all.

Nobody was insulting you. It's just that some people tend to have huge sigs, which take longer to load. Did you see anybody else getting hurted over something like that?

It's just a signature, nothing that matters in real life you shouldn't get hurt by that.
I'm a total idiot then.
And I'm about to explode because I am a bomb now.
A ticking one.

Mable
Ludwig
Ludwig
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Mable » Sat Feb 20, 2016 2:47 pm

Jesus, calm down now. It's nothing serious and stop, insulting yourself that will make people think you are one.

Ecruteak
Rocky Wrench
Rocky Wrench
Posts: 673
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2015 1:53 am
Flair: It's been...
Pronouns: she/they

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Ecruteak » Sat Feb 20, 2016 2:59 pm

Even if they tried to make them smaller, a lot of people's signatures are impossible to fix until they get a higher rank, since a lot of people are at the Pokey rank, and that rank is huge.


and I'm surprised people are giving shits about their signature sizes

Trace
Buster Beetle
Buster Beetle
Posts: 431
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:45 am

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Trace » Sat Feb 20, 2016 3:25 pm

damn, now i regret making my giant signature short, else i wouldve been on this list.

Alagirez
Boom Boom
Boom Boom
Posts: 3467
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 2:28 am
Flair: Show your fangs!
Pronouns: He/Him/That wolf
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Alagirez » Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:17 pm

MegaCDFan235 wrote:I'm leaving these forums.
I quit.
Everyone is just going to insult me now.
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
Uh I never insult you....
I will miss you :'(
also horikawa pls update the list.

mechamind
Eerie
Eerie
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:56 pm
Flair: You can set your mind to it!
Pronouns: He/Him/His

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby mechamind » Sat Feb 20, 2016 9:03 pm

Tinkerbell wrote:It's just that some people tend to have huge sigs, which take longer to load.
There's a problem with this. The 100 worst signatures were judged based on their height, not their bandwidth usage. Some people may have animations which aren't as high, but those images alone are 5 MB in size. The "SCIENCE" images that SecondScolipede had (the old and current one) both exceed 5 MB, while a tall but plain signature might only reach 1 MB with all its content combined.

penguin21
Shy Guy
Shy Guy
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 9:27 am

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby penguin21 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:14 pm

Really? . I am 56 XD

lighthouse64
Charged Spiny
Charged Spiny
Posts: 1804
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 6:28 am

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby lighthouse64 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:03 pm

penguin21 wrote:Really? . I am 56 XD
That's because your sig gif scientifically needs more shading


Return to “SuperMarioBrosX.org”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari