The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

For topics related to SuperMarioBrosX.org. Suggest anything that you would like to see on the site here.
TLtimelord
Red Yoshi Egg
Red Yoshi Egg
Posts: 2668
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:16 pm
Flair: Info under raps

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby TLtimelord » Fri Aug 26, 2016 11:04 am

K

We know we have a signature problem when my mobile safari crashes faster on this site than social media sites.

zlaker
Birdo
Birdo
Posts: 2844
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:46 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby zlaker » Fri Aug 26, 2016 11:11 am

are people proud of having enormous signatures?

Circle Guy
Rocky Wrench
Rocky Wrench
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:25 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Circle Guy » Fri Aug 26, 2016 11:30 am

zlakergirl357 wrote:are people proud of having enormous signatures?
probably

Emral
Cute Yoshi Egg
Cute Yoshi Egg
Posts: 9722
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:58 pm
Flair: Phoenix

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Emral » Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:01 pm

heh.
Image

Zeldamaster12
Cid
Cid
Posts: 4103
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:43 pm
Flair: stop looking at my flair dangit

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Zeldamaster12 » Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:13 pm

At least he uses spoilers.

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4781
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby aero » Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:20 pm

That's where we're at. Shooting for "at least."

TLtimelord
Red Yoshi Egg
Red Yoshi Egg
Posts: 2668
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:16 pm
Flair: Info under raps

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby TLtimelord » Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:30 pm

Enjl wrote:heh.
Image
Glad I'm not the only one who noticed.

Circle Guy
Rocky Wrench
Rocky Wrench
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:25 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Circle Guy » Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:26 pm

Enjl wrote:heh.
Image
with the magic of spoilers you can make your sig as big as you want
plus there are 2 youtube videos

Cedur
Raccoon Mario
Raccoon Mario
Posts: 7073
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:14 am
Flair: I'm gone, for chess and minesweeper
Pronouns: he/him

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Cedur » Sat Aug 27, 2016 12:27 pm

Opening spoilers doesn't count toward the signature's length in this ranking, right?

Circle Guy
Rocky Wrench
Rocky Wrench
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:25 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Circle Guy » Sat Aug 27, 2016 1:19 pm

Supershroom wrote:Opening spoilers doesn't count toward the signature's length in this ranking, right?
No.
If it did, mine would've been on it.

Egg
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Egg » Mon Aug 29, 2016 4:19 am

I don't see the problem with big signatures

WindyDelcarlo
Hoopster
Hoopster
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 7:06 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby WindyDelcarlo » Thu Sep 15, 2016 1:17 am

Distracting and unnecessary are two big parts of it.

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4781
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby aero » Thu Sep 15, 2016 3:44 am

Story of my life.

Gameinsky
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 240
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:59 am

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Gameinsky » Thu Sep 15, 2016 5:33 am

Two other things about them signatures: Very few people actually care to look at the videos, huge images etc. in signatures. They can be funny the first time but all they do afterwards is be a burden as some signatures are so big they don't even fit on my 1920*1080 monitor. (Considering that's reasonably big for a resolution, it's insane that signatures are bigger than that)
I'm thankful that Horikawa has made this thread as quite a few people used spoilers and as a result the forums look a lot more clean.

The signature on Knuckle's forums were worse though *shudders*

Egg
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Egg » Fri Sep 16, 2016 8:48 pm

then why put my signature in a spoiler if nobody bothers opening them. I want everyone to see it

TLtimelord
Red Yoshi Egg
Red Yoshi Egg
Posts: 2668
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:16 pm
Flair: Info under raps

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby TLtimelord » Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:33 am

Gameinsky wrote:Two other things about them signatures: Very few people actually care to look at the videos, huge images etc. in signatures. They can be funny the first time but all they do afterwards is be a burden as some signatures are so big they don't even fit on my 1920*1080 monitor. (Considering that's reasonably big for a resolution, it's insane that signatures are bigger than that)
I'm thankful that Horikawa has made this thread as quite a few people used spoilers and as a result the forums look a lot more clean.

The signature on Knuckle's forums were worse though *shudders*
Quite frankly videos in signatures should be banned.

FireyPaperMario
Wart
Wart
Posts: 6206
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:39 pm
Flair: 90's kid born in late 1993 ^_^"
Pronouns: He/Him
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby FireyPaperMario » Sat Sep 17, 2016 11:56 am

TNTtimelord wrote:
Gameinsky wrote:Two other things about them signatures: Very few people actually care to look at the videos, huge images etc. in signatures. They can be funny the first time but all they do afterwards is be a burden as some signatures are so big they don't even fit on my 1920*1080 monitor. (Considering that's reasonably big for a resolution, it's insane that signatures are bigger than that)
I'm thankful that Horikawa has made this thread as quite a few people used spoilers and as a result the forums look a lot more clean.

The signature on Knuckle's forums were worse though *shudders*
Quite frankly videos in signatures should be banned.
I couldn't agreed more! Signatures should be texts & images. :!: :!: :!:

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4781
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby aero » Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:53 pm

Image

Cedur
Raccoon Mario
Raccoon Mario
Posts: 7073
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:14 am
Flair: I'm gone, for chess and minesweeper
Pronouns: he/him

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Cedur » Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:54 pm

This doesn't work for specific users only. If you could undisplay a specific user's sig (with a click on their profile or something) then we wouldn't have that much of a problem with excessively large signatures.

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4781
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby aero » Sat Sep 17, 2016 1:21 pm

Image


Return to “SuperMarioBrosX.org”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari