Mafia Player Database (M1 - M49)

Cedur · Postby **Cedur** » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:28 am

updated with M36

Edit: fixed image

Thehelmetguy1 · Postby **Thehelmetguy1** » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:32 am

You should fix the image

MacDuckBeat · Postby **MacDuckBeat** » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:36 am

Original post: show

EDIT: Okay, the thread's image is fixed.

Thehelmetguy1 · Postby **Thehelmetguy1** » Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:47 am

MECHDRAGON777 · Postby **MECHDRAGON777** » Tue Apr 04, 2017 4:29 pm

Would not glitch4 and qiq be tied for first? The same way that HeneryRichard should be tied for third?

How does 14-7 beat 12-5 yet 8-3 beat 9-4? If glitch4 is ahead of qiq (I think it should be a tie) should not my 9-4 beat HeneryRichard's 8-3 (I still think it should be a tie)? I just wanted an explanation on how you contradict yourself in the top four?

Cedur · Postby **Cedur** » Tue Apr 04, 2017 4:35 pm

Mistakes yo. Will fix tomorrow, thanks for pointing out.

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:01 pm

Does glitch4 actually legitimately participate in games? lol

Postby **ElectriKong** » Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:04 pm

Danny wrote:Does glitch4 actually legitimately participate in games? lol

I don't think so

Cedur · Postby **Cedur** » Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:07 pm

I've clarified enough already that this statistics don't indicate towards someone's skill or general activity in games. Yeah glitch4 participated many many times so you could guess he's an active player, while in fact he's not really.

I guess the most useful info is to see if someone has been active in a game ever at all (--> host sign-up condition) and at how many games they participated, even if they weren't very active.

TDK · Postby **TDK** » Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:17 pm

I only won one game, so my ratio should be 1:3 .

PixelPest · Postby **PixelPest** » Sun Apr 23, 2017 11:21 pm

Using Shroom's data I tried to throw together something a little more sophisticated: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... p=drivesdk

This spreadsheet basically looks like this rn:

Some of its key features are an alphabetical list, averages, ratios, and an experience rating that I put together from the following formula I came up with tonight. One of the things I didn't like about Shroom's listing is that at doesn't really credit people for how long they've been playing and their experience, even if their win-to-loss ratio isn't great.
$Exp = \sqrt{\frac{Wins}{Losses + 1}}\times(Wins + Losses)$

Please tell me what you think.

Supershroom wrote:

On a side note, I noticed that Ragont's name is listed twice in the OP

Nanaya · Postby **Nanaya** » Mon Apr 24, 2017 12:52 am

have the second highest exp... FEAR ME
thats p cool, must have taken time and math
so we had 79 people play mafia on this fourm
thats not so bad actually

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Mon Apr 24, 2017 12:57 am

Looks good, and I definitely prefer that layout and algorithm better than the simple one Supershroom had. I would definitely compile the list so that it's categorized by rankings, rather than alphabetically.

Megar · Postby **Megar** » Mon Apr 24, 2017 8:48 am

when u got the highest ratio

Postby **glitch4** » Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:52 am

Lol my exp rating high af. I'm gonna try be more active in next mafia games.

PixelPest · Postby **PixelPest** » Tue Apr 25, 2017 6:27 pm

Updated my database with M37's results btw

PixelPest · Postby **PixelPest** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:59 pm

Now with M38 results and 80 players of Mafia in total: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... p=drivesdk

Most wins: Zeldamaster12 (17)
Highest ratio (of a player having played >5 games): ShadowStarX (6:2)
Highest ratio (of a player having played 5 or less games): thehelmetguy1 (4:1)
Highest experience rating: Also Zeldamaster12 (33.1)

MECHDRAGON777 · Postby **MECHDRAGON777** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 4:25 pm

PixelPest wrote:Updated my database with M37's results btw

That means you double counted M37

PixelPest · Postby **PixelPest** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 5:24 pm

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:
PixelPest wrote:Updated my database with M37's results btw
That means you double counted M37

Shroom didn't afaik

MECHDRAGON777 · Postby **MECHDRAGON777** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:03 pm

PixelPest wrote:
MECHDRAGON777 wrote:
PixelPest wrote:Updated my database with M37's results btw
That means you double counted M37
Shroom didn't afaik

He actually added it an never updated the thread title. He updated it with M37 on April 4th. Change log is in bold right above the ranking.