M21: Lone Wolf

[Mivixion]

OK everybody, why aren't we talking?

[Shadow Yoshi]

Night 2 is over! Nobody died!

It is now Day 2. Day 2 ends at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, June 25th, 2015.

[underFlo]

Alright sooo did anyone check Mivi? Actually, should one even say if he did that? After all, it's only really useful for this day, the next day he could've already been bitten.

Also more activity from everyone that wasn't on Mivi's list from a few days back, regardlesy of where he puts certain people those were p much the only ones that were active. Of course, everyone in general should be more active.

[underFlo]

Actually here's a link: http://www.supermariobrosx.org/forums/v ... 80#p149119

Also @Joey if multiple players use a potion in one night, of course only one will get used. But will the other players keep their potion?

[Shadow Yoshi]

No, players do not keep their potions.

[underFlo]

are you kidding me how has no one posted yet

So, I don't think we should just sit here doing nothing. Assuming the wolf isn't a total dumbass, it's 8:2 atm, btw.

If we gotta lynch someone I'd say go for Mivi in case no one threw a potion at him, otherwise I'd argue we could lynch someone inactive because we really need more activity this game. I could goon and on about this like in M20, but I don't just wanna repeat myself. Also, keep in mind you won't be able to rely on a power role this game, interrogations and reads are all we have.

Also reminder that anyone who you thought was human before could be a wolf now, and sadly no one of you has given me anything to go by so far.

[Mivixion]

If anyone used their potion on me, please specify right now.

[Zeldamaster12]

I didn't use my potion last night.

[Mivixion]

I retracted my potion usage last-minute, in case anyone actually used their potion on me. Let's hold off of lynching me until everyone confirms they didn't use their potions on me.

[glitch4]

Uh, maybe we should lynch one of the inactive players? Someone's may act suspicious, not sure

[underFlo]

Uh, maybe we should lynch one of the inactive players? Someone's may act suspicious, not sure

how about we start with you

No but seriously, coming from such an inactive player like you, I'm not sure what to think of that.

[Zeldamaster12]

Voting off inactives is never a good idea if you already have leads.

[Julia Pseudo]

I didn't use my potion last night either.

I don't suspect anyone besides Mivixion (a very small amount), by the way.

[Mivixion]

Voting off inactives is never a good idea if you already have leads.

The reason people are suspicious of me is because I voted for you under a pretense that also applied to me.
glitch4 just did the same.

[Waddle]

I still have my potion, too

[Zeldamaster12]

Voting off inactives is never a good idea if you already have leads.

The reason people are suspicious of me is because I voted for you under a pretense that also applied to me.
glitch4 just did the same.

I wasn't referring to just glitch4, I was referring to inactives in general.

[RudeGuy]

I too didn't use my potion.

[Mivixion]

Voting off inactives is never a good idea if you already have leads.

The reason people are suspicious of me is because I voted for you under a pretense that also applied to me.
glitch4 just did the same.

I wasn't referring to just glitch4, I was referring to inactives in general.

You completely missed the point here.
If you think I'm a lead, glitch4 literally just did the same thing as I did to make me suspicious, but because he's inactive it somehow defends him?

Everyone is suspicious of me because I voted for you for a reason that applied to me as well, right?
glitch4 just said that we should lynch an inactive.
A reason that applies to him as well.
If I'm a lead, why isn't he?

[Zeldamaster12]

I never said he wasn't a lead.

[Mivixion]

I never said he wasn't a lead.

You may have never said it, but you sure implied it.

Voting off inactives is never a good idea if you already have leads.