Page 5 of 87

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:43 pm
by zioy
Kep wrote:Whoa whoa... Quill was demoted? I could understand if you found him an irresponsible administrator, but he still had a way of being there when you needed him, and he handled spam attacks very well and I hate to say it, but he handled spam attacks even better than you, Joey. All in all, I think it was a bad move to demote him and I wished you would have kept him. Oh, and if you really do plan to take his position away permanently, could you maybe add another administrator to the team? I feel two is too little.
I say we need 3 admins and 5 moderators and that's balanced enough.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:49 pm
by aero
Kep wrote:Whoa whoa... Quill was demoted? I could understand if you found him an irresponsible administrator, but he still had a way of being there when you needed him, and he handled spam attacks very well and I hate to say it, but he handled spam attacks even better than you, Joey. All in all, I think it was a bad move to demote him and I wished you would have kept him. Oh, and if you really do plan to take his position away permanently, could you maybe add another administrator to the team? I feel two is too little.
He resigned, not demoted.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:50 pm
by zioy
In that case we need somebody to take his place.
New election perhaps?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:52 pm
by silent_
KoolKat wrote:New election perhaps?
NO NO NO NO NO

Seriously, the staff election caused so much unnecessary drama and it was one of the worst things that ever happened to the community.
Please just no.

P.S. GhostHawk thanks for telling me that, I didn't realize he resigned.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:53 pm
by zioy
Kep wrote:
KoolKat wrote:New election perhaps?
NO NO NO NO NO

Seriously, the staff election caused so much unnecessary drama and it was one of the worst things that ever happened to the community.
Please just no.

P.S. GhostHawk thanks for telling me that, I didn't realize he resigned.
Good point. I'd like to see who the new staff would be.
I think Ignoritus or GhostHawk would make a good admin
And the new moderator..... Hard decision

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:58 pm
by aero
KoolKat wrote:Good point. I'd like to see who the new staff would be.
I think Ignoritus or GhostHawk would make a good admin
And the new moderator..... Hard decision
Campaign season already?
Spoiler: show
Image
But seriously we've done fine without Quill since the spam has stopped for the most part. I think two admins will do for now.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:01 pm
by silent_
KoolKat wrote:And the new moderator..... Hard decision
I think Natsu would be a great moderator, but rumor is that Joey won't allow him to have a staff position because he needs to "improve his English". Correct me if I'm wrong. If not Natsu, however, I would like to see Kyo get a moderator position since he had one back in the NSMBX days so he has experience and he's generally a nice and mature fellow. He shines among a majority of the community as well. But under the risk that this isn't the thread to discuss who should be staff, let's drop it.

I would like to see the GFX pipe at the top contain the graphics packs shown in this thread: http://www.smbxgame.com/forums/v ... =31&t=1385. It would be nicer than having a bunch of bold black text saying "Coming soon", at least.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:11 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
This is not a thread for discussion on who should/shouldn't have a staff position.

We're not hiring another administrator because we don't need one. And even if we did, we definitely would not have an election.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:20 pm
by Fuyu
It's funny how you were annoyed with Quill's position as an Administrator, but now he isn't you start saying it was a bad decision to demote him. Pretty funny if I say so myself.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:00 pm
by Fuyu
It appears I'm having some issues trying to access these forums. For some reasons the pages loads, but sometimes it doesn't. Are the forums on undergoing maintenance of some sort?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:38 pm
by zioy
Yeah I'm having the same problem

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:44 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
I'm working to get this resolved. In the meantime, feel free to join the Chat because we aren't having those problems there.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:53 pm
by zioy
Joey wrote:I'm working to get this resolved. In the meantime, feel free to join the Chat because we aren't having those problems there.
It's fixed for me now

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:05 pm
by lighthouse64
Natsu wrote:It appears I'm having some issues trying to access these forums. For some reasons the pages loads, but sometimes it doesn't. Are the forums on undergoing maintenance of some sort?
I was undergoing that too :-(. I couldn't even use the chat :o

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:09 pm
by RudeGuy
lighthouse64 wrote:I couldn't even use the chat :o
That's because D4rknova/Harley managed to crash StarNet.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:25 pm
by lighthouse64
Christian07 wrote:
lighthouse64 wrote:I couldn't even use the chat :o
That's because D4rknova/Harley managed to crash StarNet.
OMG, Also I can't seem to delete that double post I made. :O

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 1:30 pm
by Valtteri
lighthouse64 wrote:OMG, Also I can't seem to delete that double post I made. :O
Fixed that for you.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:41 pm
by lighthouse64
Valtteri wrote:
lighthouse64 wrote:OMG, Also I can't seem to delete that double post I made. :O
Fixed that for you.
Thx. :) It was weird.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:21 pm
by Mable
Joey wrote: We're not hiring another administrator because we don't need one.
I wonder where i heard this already.
Also Joey your server is so insecure since Harley can take it down easily.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:41 pm
by aero
CaptainSyrup wrote:Also Joey your server is so insecure since Harley can take it down easily.
There's next to no effective ways other than a browser checking service to stop ddos attacks if they're done right.