Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 12:53 am
Am getting ready for the shit amount of people bugging him with really stupid questions.
>not even 2.0Joey wrote:"I saw that 1.4.2 was a thing and wanted to check out the community."
This is from our Facebook conversation.
I think, you are must be carefull, or let that Redigit who has been registered here will confirm himself me with answering to my bunch of technical questions. He must know that because he is developer of SMBx. I and my friends are know that because we are hacked/disassembled SMBX 1.3 and made LunaLUA on it.Tunnel King wrote:Redigit cannot speak to you - or anyone - about SMBX, in any capacity or under any circumstances.
There are legal reasons why he cannot, and therefore will not do so.
Redigit is not going to give you comments, blessings/permission, or source code to help you with
whatever it is you are doing. Please stop asking about it.
To the best of my knowledge, you do not know Redigit personally; therefore anything that you say
that you "understand" about him is purely speculation on your part, and has no basis in fact.
Please stop trying to contact Redigit through this forum. Thanks.
Anyway, if he is real deal, I wish to discuss my topic which I began in 14 September 2015, but I was been rejected by himself and his admins.AeroMatter wrote:Wohlstand: Redigit came to Joey and talked on both Facebook and IRC to verify that he's the real deal. He was on IRC under the name Gomba, and the IP he connected with originates from Indiana, where Redigit lives.
No, it's Bertie :pCedrik wrote:Is Redigit back?
I see, someone is an administrator, name: Redigit.
If you read the other pages you may know.Cedrik wrote:Is Redigit back?
I see, someone is an administrator, name: Redigit.
I don't found anythink, where?Tinkerbell wrote:If you read the other pages you may know.Cedrik wrote:Is Redigit back?
I see, someone is an administrator, name: Redigit.
The 44. page will answer your questions.Cedrik wrote:I don't found anythink, where?Tinkerbell wrote:If you read the other pages you may know.Cedrik wrote:Is Redigit back?
I see, someone is an administrator, name: Redigit.
Eh... I really prefer what's been happening with 2.0, myself. I really think it's cool how everyone worked together on that.Joey wrote:"I saw that 1.4.2 was a thing and wanted to check out the community."
This is from our Facebook conversation.
I have never seen a 2.0 vs 1.4 storm. What are you talking about?Tinkerbell wrote:I just think the whole 2.0 vs 1.4 storm should die.
It's as hilarious as mario maker vs smbx was.
I honestly have to agree.Tinkerbell wrote:I just think the whole 2.0 vs 1.4 storm should die.
It's as hilarious as mario maker vs smbx was.
The physics on SMBX 1.4.2 are much than before, now jumps and movements are more natural and similar to the original SMBX.Horikawa Otane wrote:Additionally, it is a rewrite from scratch and the physics are a bit off, some levels from 1.3.0.x that rely upon precise jumps and stuff may not be compatible with 1.4.x. That's a major thing.
This bug was fixed 1 month ago, no more Chinese mode needed as Tinkerbell pointed.Horiwaka Otane wrote:1.4.x needs Chinese mode... For some reason. Which means levels designed in it will have very limited reach and are difficult to play for non-Chinese people.
I don't think this is a problem, I.e if someone uses SMBX 1.4.x then that person should be completely sure the level won't be compatble with older versions due new features. Anyway PGE is starting to support SMBX65-38A level formats:Horikawa Otane wrote:A level made with 1.4.x is not compatible with 1.3.0.x or 2.0. A level made with 2.0, provided it does not use pngs, custom sfx/music files, any lunalua features, or >200 warps, ought to be compatible with 1.3.0.x.
(Watch the full quote here) so practicaly it does, but not so good. Let's hope in a future it can do it without any problem. SMBX 1.4.2 support 500 Warps and custom sfx too...WohIstand wrote:Currently PGE Editor opens SMBX65-38A levels, but: because I wasn't finished events side, some properies are will be lost...
I have to agree with Tinkerbell, there's a storm between SMBX 1.4.2 and SMBX 2.0. Personally if someone prefer SMBX lunalua/2.0 rather than SMBX 1.4.2 I don't care, "have fun then", but this is starting to being a problem.RudeGuy wrote:I have never seen a 2.0 vs 1.4 storm. What are you talking about?