Page 44 of 87

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:14 pm
by PixelPest
Joey wrote:So, y'all will probably notice that we have a...new edition to the staff team.

Please don't bother him with PMs.
Don't believe this whatsoever.

And what happened to Quill?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:18 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
(Quill was demoted, unfortunately, due to a dispute that isn't something I want to bring up)

Before I get an onslaught of "lol fake" posts, I want to say that I would not make someone with this username an administrator, MUCH LESS LET THEM KEEP THEIR ACCOUNT, if I wasn't absolutely certain that this is the real thing.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:21 pm
by PixelPest
So this actually Redigit? You know it's only February 23. You're a little early for April Fools.
It's kinda funny that that account says, "A friend told me about SMBX." There should be an option, "I made SMBX."

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:24 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
Yes, it's actually Redigit.

Also I was just visibly geeking out because I can now use the Kain rank that's been in the special ranks list since I started this forum.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:25 pm
by PixelPest
You're actually serious? But why would he come back after all of this time?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:27 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
"I saw that 1.4.2 was a thing and wanted to check out the community."

This is from our Facebook conversation.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:27 pm
by CopyLeft
but joey, we already found redigit

Joking aside, I am certainly hyped for this.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:28 pm
by aero
PixelPest wrote:You're actually serious? But why would he come back after all of this time?
To finish what he started????? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:33 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
AeroMatter wrote:
PixelPest wrote:You're actually serious? But why would he come back after all of this time?
To finish what he started????? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Yeah, speaking of which, expect a global announcement sometime soon.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:45 pm
by Alagirez
Joey wrote:Yes, it's actually Redigit.

Also I was just visibly geeking out because I can now use the Kain rank that's been in the special ranks list since I started this forum.
Are u serious?
wow
i hope you won't troll us.....
i hope he will release the real SMBX 1.4...
that's a fake redigit uh
call him regedit pls

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:50 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
This is a situation that we've trolled with before, but I'd have no reason to do that at 10 PM on a Tuesday in February when I should be studying.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:54 pm
by Zeldamaster12
so assuming he's the real deal (which i have my hunches he's not lol), is he sticking around?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:56 pm
by CopyLeft
Joey wrote:This is a situation that we've trolled with before, but I'd have no reason to do that at 10 PM on a Tuesday in February when I should be studying.
I would complain about you not studying, but I would probably do the same.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:58 pm
by MECHDRAGON777
Joey wrote:This is a situation that we've trolled with before, but I'd have no reason to do that at 10 PM on a Tuesday in February when I should be studying.
You do have a point.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:01 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
Zeldamaster12 wrote:so assuming he's the real deal (which i have my hunches he's not lol), is he sticking around?
Joey wrote:Before I get an onslaught of "lol fake" posts, I want to say that I would not make someone with this username an administrator, MUCH LESS LET THEM KEEP THEIR ACCOUNT, if I wasn't absolutely certain that this is the real thing.
Joey wrote:Before I get an onslaught of "lol fake" posts, I want to say that I would not make someone with this username an administrator, MUCH LESS LET THEM KEEP THEIR ACCOUNT, if I wasn't absolutely certain that this is the real thing.
Joey wrote:Before I get an onslaught of "lol fake" posts, I want to say that I would not make someone with this username an administrator, MUCH LESS LET THEM KEEP THEIR ACCOUNT, if I wasn't absolutely certain that this is the real thing.
Joey wrote:Before I get an onslaught of "lol fake" posts, I want to say that I would not make someone with this username an administrator, MUCH LESS LET THEM KEEP THEIR ACCOUNT, if I wasn't absolutely certain that this is the real thing.
Joey wrote:Before I get an onslaught of "lol fake" posts, I want to say that I would not make someone with this username an administrator, MUCH LESS LET THEM KEEP THEIR ACCOUNT, if I wasn't absolutely certain that this is the real thing.
Joey wrote:Before I get an onslaught of "lol fake" posts, I want to say that I would not make someone with this username an administrator, MUCH LESS LET THEM KEEP THEIR ACCOUNT, if I wasn't absolutely certain that this is the real thing.
I'm avoiding posting screenshots of our Facebook conversation but I will do that if it becomes necessary.

Anyway, he's not going to be "sticking around" as in having an active account and keeping up with the forums, but he's not going to be completely inactive. :P

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:11 pm
by Superiorstar
I didn't look at everything but I assume a few of us are thinking the same thing.
Does he have the source code?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:28 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
*smiles*

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:56 pm
by Julia Pseudo
Isn't the creator returning to our world the first sign of the end times?

EITHER WAY HOLY SHIT HRRRRRRRRNNNNNNNNNN

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:59 pm
by Lx Xzit
Does he have a specific purpose here?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:59 pm
by aero
Image