Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Joey wrote:

Choco wrote:How much detective work do you think we can do on Night 1? We're not going to get phantoms just because nobody is suspicious.

Maybe not Night 1 so much, but Day 1 is good for detective work.

To clarify: safeties themselves (i.e. "I'll put a safety on Choco", because you don't have any leads and want to not get a phantom so you'll put a vote on someone who won't get lynched) are not against the rules. I was putting a stop to simply saying "Safety" because that doesn't harbor discussion.

Why are you so aggravated by safety votes when you've been okay with it for like over five games now?

Because he doesn't want to get safety lynched? He wasn't participating in the past games.
...are you hiding something Joey?

PaperPlayerX wrote:PLOT TWIST:
Changing vote from Safety to Nien.

Doing the same.
Nien, although I'm still not sure about this.

6 votes on Nien, 1 vote on Safety. 2 more for an insta.

It would be nice if you added who died/got lynched in what day/night in the main thread so we don't have browse through the whole thread to find out that :/

PaperPlayerX wrote:

Joey wrote:

Choco wrote:How much detective work do you think we can do on Night 1? We're not going to get phantoms just because nobody is suspicious.

Maybe not Night 1 so much, but Day 1 is good for detective work.

To clarify: safeties themselves (i.e. "I'll put a safety on Choco", because you don't have any leads and want to not get a phantom so you'll put a vote on someone who won't get lynched) are not against the rules. I was putting a stop to simply saying "Safety" because that doesn't harbor discussion.

Why are you so aggravated by safety votes when you've been okay with it for like over five games now?

Choco wrote:Because he doesn't want to get safety lynched? He wasn't participating in the past games.
...are you hiding something Joey?

I'm not aggravated at all. I haven't been paying attention to recent Mafia games and had no idea that random safety votes were happening.

All votes for "Safety" are null.

PaperPlayerX wrote:

Joey wrote:

Choco wrote:How much detective work do you think we can do on Night 1? We're not going to get phantoms just because nobody is suspicious.

Maybe not Night 1 so much, but Day 1 is good for detective work.

To clarify: safeties themselves (i.e. "I'll put a safety on Choco", because you don't have any leads and want to not get a phantom so you'll put a vote on someone who won't get lynched) are not against the rules. I was putting a stop to simply saying "Safety" because that doesn't harbor discussion.

Why are you so aggravated by safety votes when you've been okay with it for like over five games now?

He's not aggravated by it, he just states his opinion, and he obviously was "okay" with them the other games because he wasn't there. And no, Choco, I doubt he's hiding something just because he's reinforcing the original rules. To be quite honest I'm not a fan of safety votes myself since they potentially could get anyone lynched, regardless of the person being innocent or Mafia, and people just use safety votes as an excuse to not be inactive. Honestly I'd much rather have there be a rule where you just vote "nobody" so noone gets lynched. Randomly lynching the town off one by one kinda takes the fun out of the game and it makes the players lazy. If safety votes were only used in times where the town was at a dead end and seeable disadvantage (for example the mafia being one person away from winning) I would be okay with them, but stop going to safety just so you have anything to do. Stop being lazy and actually play the game by maybe talking to people and trying to find out their roles.

zlakergirl357 wrote:It would be nice if you added who died/got lynched in what day/night in the main thread so we don't have browse through the whole thread to find out that :/

done

I guess I'll go with Nien.

All I can say is that if he isn't Redigit, then I'm voting for Igno next time.

Zeldamaster12 wrote:I guess I'll go with Nien.

All I can say is that if he isn't Redigit, then I'm voting for Igno next time.

Same, same

To everyone: Please make your lynch votes clear with red color and bold, and if you change your lynch vote, do so the right way (Changing vote from DarkMatt to GhostHawk).

I'll count these for now though, but didn't you already vote for Nien, PPX?

We got 8 votes out of 15 now, meaning it's an insta!

Nien died.

Night 2 will last until Friday, 9 PM GMT. Please have all your actions ready by 8 PM GMT.

I guess Igno was right. Really good, we already got Redigit on the first day.

Now what I don't understand is, how did Igno know that Nien was Redigit?

GMarinaX wrote:I guess Igno was right. Really good, we already got Redigit on the first day.

that luke looks like weegee

Oh yeah, just for the sake of writing in large fonts:

Safety votes won't count from now on. Please vote for a player every day or at least show some activity.

I don't know, but he was right no matter what, so that's great. Got rid of one of the biggest threats very early.

Nickname wrote:Safety votes won't count from now on. Please vote for a player every day or at least show some activity.

Why? Just because Joey doesn't like it? What the hell are we supposed to do when there's literally zero evidence against anyone? Just vote for someone completely random without any evidence whatsoever?

Idk my guess would be that Nien confessed to Igno while playing Dota lmao