Page 5 of 87

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:33 am
by RudeGuy
lighthouse64 wrote:
GLD4 wrote:Do you want 200 SMBX screenshot threads? Well, than don't approve my suggestion, then.

Unless in ucp you can change how many posts per page you want, heh.
Why do we always need to lock topics after there have been 100 posts anyway.
So things get easier to search. Joey said this one time.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 2:29 pm
by Fuyu
It appears there's a problem with the red fireball image that appears on the left of each thread with unread posts. I don't know if other people have the same problem that I have, but appearently, whenever I click on the red fireball it redirects me to the very first page where the first unread posts is located instead of taking me to the first unread post. I've tried reloading the page and clicking on the red fireball several times and it still happens.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:16 pm
by Imaynotbehere4long
Natsu wrote:whenever I click on the red fireball it redirects me to the very first page where the first unread posts is located instead of taking me to the first unread post.
I actually have a similar problem: if the first unread post isn't on the last page of the thread, I will be redirected to the top of the last page instead of the first unread post.
Joey wrote:Does anybody have suggestions for stuff to put on the episodes/graphics pages? I'm already going to include links to previously featured content as well as official episodes
By this, do you mean episodes like SMB: A New Beginning, Mario Classic, Super Mario Eternal Chaos, New Super Mario Galaxy X, Super Mario Star Expedition, etc.? If not, that's what I'd like to see added to SMBX Worlds.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:19 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
I'm not having any problems with the First Unread Post link.

Imaynotbehere4long: None of those are specifically "official" episodes but I suppose we could link to them.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:26 pm
by Imaynotbehere4long
Joey wrote:None of those are specifically "official" episodes but I suppose we could link to them.
Well, you said "previously featured content," and the episodes that I listed were featured on Knux's forums, which is why I wasn't sure if you were talking about them or not.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:37 pm
by Fuyu
It seems the problem with red fireball links is solved for me now, but I don't know if it may happen again. I'll post here again if this issue happens to come back.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 6:55 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
Imaynotbehere4long wrote:
Joey wrote:None of those are specifically "official" episodes but I suppose we could link to them.
Well, you said "previously featured content," and the episodes that I listed were featured on Knux's forums, which is why I wasn't sure if you were talking about them or not.
I meant featured here on the SMBX forums, not on Knux's Forum.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:31 pm
by Mable
Joey wrote:I'm not having any problems with the First Unread Post link.

Imaynotbehere4long: None of those are specifically "official" episodes but I suppose we could link to them.
More unofficial ones should get support not just official ones...

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:34 pm
by zioy
Somethings happening. I can sense it.
First, Joey asks for suggestions for new stuff on smbx.org
Next, GMs are promoted. And now, Quill has been demoted.... Hmmmm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:41 pm
by silent_
Whoa whoa... Quill was demoted? I could understand if you found him an irresponsible administrator, but he still had a way of being there when you needed him, and he handled spam attacks very well and I hate to say it, but he handled spam attacks even better than you, Joey. All in all, I think it was a bad move to demote him and I wished you would have kept him. Oh, and if you really do plan to take his position away permanently, could you maybe add another administrator to the team? I feel two is too little.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:43 pm
by zioy
Kep wrote:Whoa whoa... Quill was demoted? I could understand if you found him an irresponsible administrator, but he still had a way of being there when you needed him, and he handled spam attacks very well and I hate to say it, but he handled spam attacks even better than you, Joey. All in all, I think it was a bad move to demote him and I wished you would have kept him. Oh, and if you really do plan to take his position away permanently, could you maybe add another administrator to the team? I feel two is too little.
I say we need 3 admins and 5 moderators and that's balanced enough.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:49 pm
by aero
Kep wrote:Whoa whoa... Quill was demoted? I could understand if you found him an irresponsible administrator, but he still had a way of being there when you needed him, and he handled spam attacks very well and I hate to say it, but he handled spam attacks even better than you, Joey. All in all, I think it was a bad move to demote him and I wished you would have kept him. Oh, and if you really do plan to take his position away permanently, could you maybe add another administrator to the team? I feel two is too little.
He resigned, not demoted.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:50 pm
by zioy
In that case we need somebody to take his place.
New election perhaps?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:52 pm
by silent_
KoolKat wrote:New election perhaps?
NO NO NO NO NO

Seriously, the staff election caused so much unnecessary drama and it was one of the worst things that ever happened to the community.
Please just no.

P.S. GhostHawk thanks for telling me that, I didn't realize he resigned.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:53 pm
by zioy
Kep wrote:
KoolKat wrote:New election perhaps?
NO NO NO NO NO

Seriously, the staff election caused so much unnecessary drama and it was one of the worst things that ever happened to the community.
Please just no.

P.S. GhostHawk thanks for telling me that, I didn't realize he resigned.
Good point. I'd like to see who the new staff would be.
I think Ignoritus or GhostHawk would make a good admin
And the new moderator..... Hard decision

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:58 pm
by aero
KoolKat wrote:Good point. I'd like to see who the new staff would be.
I think Ignoritus or GhostHawk would make a good admin
And the new moderator..... Hard decision
Campaign season already?
Spoiler: show
Image
But seriously we've done fine without Quill since the spam has stopped for the most part. I think two admins will do for now.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:01 pm
by silent_
KoolKat wrote:And the new moderator..... Hard decision
I think Natsu would be a great moderator, but rumor is that Joey won't allow him to have a staff position because he needs to "improve his English". Correct me if I'm wrong. If not Natsu, however, I would like to see Kyo get a moderator position since he had one back in the NSMBX days so he has experience and he's generally a nice and mature fellow. He shines among a majority of the community as well. But under the risk that this isn't the thread to discuss who should be staff, let's drop it.

I would like to see the GFX pipe at the top contain the graphics packs shown in this thread: http://www.smbxgame.com/forums/v ... =31&t=1385. It would be nicer than having a bunch of bold black text saying "Coming soon", at least.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:11 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
This is not a thread for discussion on who should/shouldn't have a staff position.

We're not hiring another administrator because we don't need one. And even if we did, we definitely would not have an election.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:20 pm
by Fuyu
It's funny how you were annoyed with Quill's position as an Administrator, but now he isn't you start saying it was a bad decision to demote him. Pretty funny if I say so myself.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:00 pm
by Fuyu
It appears I'm having some issues trying to access these forums. For some reasons the pages loads, but sometimes it doesn't. Are the forums on undergoing maintenance of some sort?