Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 4:04 am
Ah so Tryclyde can be moved from NSMBX to SMBX2?
yes but not in terms of becoming a vanilla asset (yet)
Page 4 of 10
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 5:23 am
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:22 pm
Look, I'm going to be real here. I apreciate that you took your time to make this engine and it looks pretty good.
Here's the thing though, was it really necessary for the SMBX community to have another engine? This was in development back in 2012 and back then it would of made sense for this engine to be released since Redigit was not longer working on SMBX at the time. But it's 2020, and now it seems late. We're living in a period of time where the entire community seems to be split into parts because of the amount of engines that now exist. Did we really need another one? especially since this engine is too similar to X2. This honestly really bothers me. The reason why I see the purpose of 38A and 2.0 is because both of those engines were attempting to continue SMBX. What is this engine's purpose going to be about?
Here's the thing though, was it really necessary for the SMBX community to have another engine? This was in development back in 2012 and back then it would of made sense for this engine to be released since Redigit was not longer working on SMBX at the time. But it's 2020, and now it seems late. We're living in a period of time where the entire community seems to be split into parts because of the amount of engines that now exist. Did we really need another one? especially since this engine is too similar to X2. This honestly really bothers me. The reason why I see the purpose of 38A and 2.0 is because both of those engines were attempting to continue SMBX. What is this engine's purpose going to be about?
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:38 pm
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:45 pm
You might have missed it but several people already said that this is a good alternative for the people who can't use 2.0. On top of that, this engine started so late because of the late discovery of the source code which was used to rewrite nsmbx in C++. There is also a lot of potential with this engine and there are plans for lua support to be added. While at first, it might seem as unnecessary, the people who can't run 2.0 and don't want to use 38A would find this as a very good alternative.SBells27 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:22 pmLook, I'm going to be real here. I apreciate that you took your time to make this engine and it looks pretty good.
Here's the thing though, was it really necessary for the SMBX community to have another engine? This was in development back in 2012 and back then it would of made sense for this engine to be released since Redigit was not longer working on SMBX at the time. But it's 2020, and now it seems late. We're living in a period of time where the entire community seems to be split into parts because of the amount of engines that now exist. Did we really need another one? especially since this engine is too similar to X2. This honestly really bothers me. The reason why I see the purpose of 38A and 2.0 is because both of those engines were attempting to continue SMBX. What is this engine's purpose going to be about?
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:56 pm
I guess that's fair. I hope 2.0 episodes get to be available on NSMBX and vice-versa though.Eri7 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:45 pmYou might have missed it but several people already said that this is a good alternative for the people who can't use 2.0. On top of that, this engine started so late because of the late discovery of the source code which was used to rewrite nsmbx in C++. There is also a lot of potential with this engine and there are plans for lua support to be added. While at first, it might seem as unnecessary, the people who can't run 2.0 and don't want to use 38A would find this as a very good alternative.SBells27 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:22 pmLook, I'm going to be real here. I apreciate that you took your time to make this engine and it looks pretty good.
Here's the thing though, was it really necessary for the SMBX community to have another engine? This was in development back in 2012 and back then it would of made sense for this engine to be released since Redigit was not longer working on SMBX at the time. But it's 2020, and now it seems late. We're living in a period of time where the entire community seems to be split into parts because of the amount of engines that now exist. Did we really need another one? especially since this engine is too similar to X2. This honestly really bothers me. The reason why I see the purpose of 38A and 2.0 is because both of those engines were attempting to continue SMBX. What is this engine's purpose going to be about?
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 1:02 pm
I don't think that will be possible because they are 2 different engines and have different features/npcs.SBells27 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:56 pmI guess that's fair. I hope 2.0 episodes get to be available on NSMBX and vice-versa though.Eri7 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:45 pmYou might have missed it but several people already said that this is a good alternative for the people who can't use 2.0. On top of that, this engine started so late because of the late discovery of the source code which was used to rewrite nsmbx in C++. There is also a lot of potential with this engine and there are plans for lua support to be added. While at first, it might seem as unnecessary, the people who can't run 2.0 and don't want to use 38A would find this as a very good alternative.SBells27 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:22 pmLook, I'm going to be real here. I apreciate that you took your time to make this engine and it looks pretty good.
Here's the thing though, was it really necessary for the SMBX community to have another engine? This was in development back in 2012 and back then it would of made sense for this engine to be released since Redigit was not longer working on SMBX at the time. But it's 2020, and now it seems late. We're living in a period of time where the entire community seems to be split into parts because of the amount of engines that now exist. Did we really need another one? especially since this engine is too similar to X2. This honestly really bothers me. The reason why I see the purpose of 38A and 2.0 is because both of those engines were attempting to continue SMBX. What is this engine's purpose going to be about?
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 2:31 pm
I appreciate that, though I made sure to specify that NSMBX's open-sourcedness means that it can be compiled to other platforms. I have heard talks of implementing LunaLua in NSMBX so I am also grateful for LunaLua being open-source.
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 3:09 pm
The scripting implementation in NSMBX would be plain lua, not lunalua, I believe. Lunalua relies on memory hooks into the SMBX 1.3 assembly, and when recompiling the code is assembled differently, so it would be unsustainable. It would still mean that a lot of code could be copied over at large, but a lot of things may work subtly differently, or use subtly different names.
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 7:09 pm
I have something to say. What if you can add another Default Episode
Also I was trying the PGE Config and that didn't go wellEri7 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 1:02 pmI don't think that will be possible because they are 2 different engines and have different features/npcs.SBells27 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:56 pmI guess that's fair. I hope 2.0 episodes get to be available on NSMBX and vice-versa though.Eri7 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:45 pm
You might have missed it but several people already said that this is a good alternative for the people who can't use 2.0. On top of that, this engine started so late because of the late discovery of the source code which was used to rewrite nsmbx in C++. There is also a lot of potential with this engine and there are plans for lua support to be added. While at first, it might seem as unnecessary, the people who can't run 2.0 and don't want to use 38A would find this as a very good alternative.
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 11:59 pm
For some reason when I use NSMBX, it lags a bit. I'm okay with lag, but the fact that it speeds up by a lot after lagging throws me off. Is there a fix for this?
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 2:59 am
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 9:00 am
that happens to me on 1.3.0.2 and 1.3.0.1GforGoomba wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 11:59 pmFor some reason when I use NSMBX, it lags a bit. I'm okay with lag, but the fact that it speeds up by a lot after lagging throws me off. Is there a fix for this?
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:41 pm
Because it can run on Mac and Linux. Did you know that Knux now uses a Mac?SBells27 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:22 pmLook, I'm going to be real here. I apreciate that you took your time to make this engine and it looks pretty good.
Here's the thing though, was it really necessary for the SMBX community to have another engine? This was in development back in 2012 and back then it would of made sense for this engine to be released since Redigit was not longer working on SMBX at the time. But it's 2020, and now it seems late. We're living in a period of time where the entire community seems to be split into parts because of the amount of engines that now exist. Did we really need another one? especially since this engine is too similar to X2. This honestly really bothers me. The reason why I see the purpose of 38A and 2.0 is because both of those engines were attempting to continue SMBX. What is this engine's purpose going to be about?
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 1:14 pm
Didn't know they were gonna make a New Super Mario Bros. X.
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 1:23 pm
Woah they do?FanofSMBX wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:41 pmBecause it can run on Mac and Linux. Did you know that Knux now uses a Mac?SBells27 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:22 pmLook, I'm going to be real here. I apreciate that you took your time to make this engine and it looks pretty good.
Here's the thing though, was it really necessary for the SMBX community to have another engine? This was in development back in 2012 and back then it would of made sense for this engine to be released since Redigit was not longer working on SMBX at the time. But it's 2020, and now it seems late. We're living in a period of time where the entire community seems to be split into parts because of the amount of engines that now exist. Did we really need another one? especially since this engine is too similar to X2. This honestly really bothers me. The reason why I see the purpose of 38A and 2.0 is because both of those engines were attempting to continue SMBX. What is this engine's purpose going to be about?
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 1:25 pm
Fixed. All I had to do was enable frameskip which was only on the launcherGforGoomba wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 11:59 pmFor some reason when I use NSMBX, it lags a bit. I'm okay with lag, but the fact that it speeds up by a lot after lagging throws me off. Is there a fix for this?
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 3:11 pm
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 6:56 pm
Huh. This oughta be interesting. While my pc luckily has no issues running SMBX2, Im interested in how things will progress. While I agree that having more and more alternatives creates an issue where you cant play episodes/levels unless you have all [insert amount of smbx versions] versions of smbx. But at the same time if they all offer unique experiences it can be interesting. At least to me. If I wanna make a level but need a specific powerup for it, I can just get the editor that has that powerup and get right down to making a level. Just sucks for the people needing to then also download that version to play it. And this one seems to be a nice alternative for those who cant run smbx2 but still want a new smbx experience with stuff that isnt in 1.3
Re: New Super Mario Bros. X
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 2:08 am
Just wondering if multiplayer is going to be supported in NSMBX with new stuff since battle mode is something I miss from the original and playing battle mode in SMBX2 is kind of buggy at the moment and I don't know if fixing it will be a priority.