Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Look at this and you'll see that it's not "arbitrary and useless". Besides, how often are you disturbed by the score display when playing "normal" episodes? Barely ever, so I don't see any practical purpose on removing the score.

It allows me to keep the HUD simple. Also, yes, this is arbitrary and useless. But I guess people can find fun in licking envelopes, too.

"Humans lead short, boring and insignificant lives, so they make up meanings and patters to feel accomplished or like they're a part of something bigger."

I know I'm late to responding, but I've been busy. There's so many replies to my stuff, that I can't possibly respond to it all without taking like half of the page up. So here's my generalized response/thoughts:

I will be sticking to 1.3.0.1 with the addition of Lua. That means I will not be able to play 2k16 December Collapse, but ah, such is life. It's a shame, too, because Enjl's YT video thumbnails about this episode looked cool. The only reason I even got this whole thing started was that I thought I could play December Collapse without 2.0, since Enjl said I needed 2.0 to play Hypnosis Redo in this topic (But I played it with 1.3 + Lua just fine), and I said I would play December Collapse with 1.3 + Lua in this topic, then people said, "You need 2.0!", and it kind of just spiraled from there.


I do have to say, though, the music choice was exquisite. I'm glad you've posted the tracks you've used, as that makes it a ton easier to download it. Also, I've been waiting for someone to use the castle theme from DKC2 again. That is absolutely an amazing track. It's kind of sad the only other person I've been able to find that used that track was Dragonmaster146 in his level "Toxic Castle". I haven't been able to find any others.

Also, I never knew your original username was LayerMM12P, Enjl. Was it for Knux's forums?

One more thing: Enjl, why is the play-through of Toxic Castle on your channel "Private"?

I thought "judging from a screenshot" is as low as someone could go with feedback but "judging from music" is a concept I can't help but laugh at. The reason why I said this

Enjl wrote: Stop posting in this topic at once and don't return until you have something meaningful to say about the game.
If you want to continue this discussion, please take it to PM.

is exactly because your next message would be long and addressing thr points that we make here. But instead you reiterate on your stubborn behaviour once more without taking anything that was said into account.
Nobody'd forcing you to regularly use 2.0 even though there's literally no downside. If you were smart about your stubbornness you'd have made a 2nd installation for 2.0-related stuff that you just barely ever touch.
Also I can't believe you're so insistent on using the version you're using while not even knowing that it's called 1.3.0.2. I'm honestly surprised how you've been insistently wrong on every level throughout this discussion.

mariogeek2 wrote:That means I will not be able to play 2k16 December Collapse, but ah, such is life.

No, such is only you in this case.

On the other hand:

Enjl wrote:I thought "judging from a screenshot" is as low as someone could go with feedback but "judging from music" is a concept I can't help but laugh at

didn't he just say that he liked the music?

Also, not ditching the scorebar doesn't really have any downside either. Ditching it is just only inconsiderate towards people who genuinely like scores and numbers.

Would you program score from scratch just for some random people?

Supershroom wrote: Also, not ditching the scorebar doesn't really have any downside either. Ditching it is just only inconsiderate towards people who genuinely like scores and numbers.

You're quite literally the only person on this community who cares about score. Neither did I know about your obsession with numbers, nor did I feel the need to include a useless feature for one random person who might play the game.

Supershroom wrote:

Enjl wrote:I thought "judging from a screenshot" is as low as someone could go with feedback but "judging from music" is a concept I can't help but laugh at

didn't he just say that he liked the music?

Calling the music choices exquisite is hardly meaningful if you're not familiar with the scenarios in which they're used in.

So, the next thing is probably that the scorebar is completely removed in the next beta? The scorebar isn't completely useless, and it's always been an essential part of the game, and of Mario games in general. Drop the attitude.

Supershroom wrote:So, the next thing is probably that the scorebar is completely removed in the next beta? The scorebar isn't completely useless, and it's always been an essential part of the game, and of Mario games in general. Drop the attitude.

That's quite a lot of attitude from someone requesting it to be dropped. I have to agree with Enjl here though; I really don't understand the point of a score, especially in a game like this. I never really even look at it or care about it and don't see any reason to

Look, I don't ask anyone to care about it, but what's the harm with it? Well, there's actually no harm that isn't made up. And again, there's people who indeed care, not just me, and killing the scorebar would take away a lot of the gameplay experience.

If you want a compromise then there should be at least a way to display / undisplay score through the Options menu. If this can be implemented then it would be a fine way to meet in the middle.

Supershroom wrote:and it's always been an essential part of the game,

how is it essential?

Supershroom wrote:Look, I don't ask anyone to care about it, but what's the harm with it? Well, there's actually no harm that isn't made up. And again, there's people who indeed care, not just me, and killing the scorebar would take away a lot of the gameplay experience.

If you want a compromise then there should be at least a way to display / undisplay score through the Options menu. If this can be implemented then it would be a fine way to meet in the middle.

So someone should compromise for a small group of just a few people or less to put time into changing their own game despite being content with the product right now?

Supershroom wrote:Look, I don't ask anyone to care about it, but what's the harm with it? Well, there's actually no harm that isn't made up. And again, there's people who indeed care, not just me, and killing the scorebar would take away a lot of the gameplay experience.

If you want a compromise then there should be at least a way to display / undisplay score through the Options menu. If this can be implemented then it would be a fine way to meet in the middle.

No. The score counter is not essential nor does it help the player in any way. The score has always been about bragging rights, but in a game where completion is what defines a good player the score becomes meaningless. You can try to get a really high score on any game if that pleases you, but if a game doesn't account for a score counter keep in mind it's precisely because you're not supposedto aim for a good score, but for completion..

Scores in these kinds of games have been pretty much archaic since the late 80s-early 90s anyway.

You know what I forgot to mention in my last reply? That episode logo. That logo is a really frickin' good-looking episode logo. Like, perhaps, maybe the best around.


Seriously, though, Enjl, I kind of meant my last reply as a kind of "These are my reasons why". I was going to take the conversation to private messaging. I specifically mentioned that I didn't bring up all of the previous points everyone made because it would've taken up half the screen, as I pointed out earlier, not because I didn't take anything into account. I read all of the replies, and I'm working on responses now.

Speaking of, didn't you read my reasons for not using 2.0? Having 2.0 separate from 1.3.0.1 doesn't solve all of those things. And, I checked, it's not 1.3.0.2. It's 1.3.0.1. Here: viewtopic.php?f=69&t=4303


And, Supershroom, I might like a score system too, but the work required to add it as an option to turn off/on in the game looks like it would be a lot of work. And I meant "such is life" as in "life without 2.0".

From the LunaLUA installation page:


The LunaLua supported version is actually called 1.3.0.2. just so ya' know.

mariogeek2 wrote: Speaking of, didn't you read my reasons for not using 2.0? Having 2.0 separate from 1.3.0.1 doesn't solve all of those things. And, I checked, it's not 1.3.0.2. It's 1.3.0.1. Here: viewtopic.php?f=69&t=4303

Nowhere in the changelog of that version does it say Lua support is added. 1.3.0.2, the first lua-compatible version, is available here http://wohlsoft.ru/LunaLua/

Don't mind me, I am just a random guy watching people attacking each other because of a fucking game.

Ok this has gone long enough.

mariogeek2, if you don't want to switch to 2.0 that's fine. But Enjl has requested to drop the topic and yet to keep coming back. Please respect his petition, and if you want to keep talking about all of this you better choose a better place to do it, like on PM.

thehelmentguy1 please don't go adding fuel to the fire.