Super Mario Bros. X Forums

voting SuperShroom because voting for spinda that fast seems suspicious.

TNTtimelord wrote:SMBXorg mafia advice, Supershroom. If you do so much as breathe in Spinda's direction in the mafia thread, prepare to die via bandwagon

Yeah, no. It would've been the exact same had he voted for somebody else without any evidence whatever, so cut it out with the "everyone is biased towards Spinda" talk.

As for my vote, I might as well vote for Supershroom. If he turns up as Mafia, then it'd probably be a good idea to put Nuclear_Blaze on our suspicion list.

Okay. That brings it up to:

• 2 votes on Spinda (Supershroom and Nuclear_Blaze)
• 4 votes on Supershroom (RezsureXion, PixelPest, Sanct, and Zeldamaster12)

Fix from the last post (please ignore it)

Okay. That brings it up to:

• 2 votes on Spinda (Supershroom and Nuclear_Blaze)
• 4 votes on Supershroom (RezsureXion, PixelPest, Sanct, and Zeldamaster12)

Supershroom wrote:I'd strongly suggest to change this for the next game, so someone could voice a little suspicion but it doesn't have consequences if it stays insecure and people don't bandwagon. Besides, if I was Mafia, I'd have communicated voting strategies with the other Mafiosi first.

or you know

just

voice your suspicion without voting???

Also, the fact that you're using the fact that you voted for me and made this mistake to defend yourself makes it possible that this was in fact planned from the start to make yourself lool innocent.
Arguments like those usually don't go too far so it's best not to rely on those.

As such, Supershroom's reactions are only really making him more suspicious.

... Balancing out the votes would have been a much better idea, as it's clear that the two players who voted for Spinda are (no offence) rather inexperienced so this may not have been the smartest move. Oh well. I'm just going to claim Hippie again, so if you're a blue and you're able to prove it to me that would be super duper cool.

Nevermind the first statement, I just found out that equal votes result in RNG doing the job; voting for Supershroom was indeed a better idea.

I'd wait until Night 2 for the blues to contact you just to be sure there's no counterclaims.

I forgot to reiterate earlier that I can guarantee Spinda is innocent because he gets trigger-happy with bandwagons when he's innocent, if I know anything from previous games.

Also, can someone explain to me why Supershroom is so suspicious? To me it just looks like he's suspicious because he's unfamiliar with our shitty way of playing mafia so we're kicking out the misfit. I'm not voting because I just don't see where this red flag came from.

The problem with not voting is that we'd risk either Spinda dying, or we'd leave it up to RNG which is never a good idea; lynching him was the safest option considering the alternatives I just stated.

Supershroom voted almost instantly without substantial evidence, then when we called him out on it, Nuclear_Blaze tried to get the attention off of Supershroom. This is most definitely a lead, and it's better than randomly voting.

I will vote for Supershroom for the suspicious actions she took to vote for Spinda for the earliest possible point.

Two more votes for Supershroom and we'll have ourselves an Insta

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:I will vote for Supershroom for the suspicious actions she took to vote for Spinda for the earliest possible point.

Edit: Change "She" to "S/he"

Zeldamaster12 wrote:Supershroom voted almost instantly without substantial evidence, then when we called him out on it, Nuclear_Blaze tried to get the attention off of Supershroom. This is most definitely a lead, and it's better than randomly voting.

So we are lynching based off lack of experience. Ok, smart idea, because that worked with Jacob for the first five games of mafia he played in. I'm not moving my opinion unless he really is mafia at the end of the day phase.

Exactly how much of a chance did Supermushroom get to explain himself before we jumped the gun on him for jumping the gun?

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:I will vote for Supershroom for the suspicious actions she took to vote for Spinda for the earliest possible point.

Edit: Change "She" to "S/he"

I'm not sure that's entirely necessary, but okay.

TNTtimelord wrote:Exactly how much of a chance did Supermushroom get to explain himself before we jumped the gun on him for jumping the gun?

None, from what I gathered. The major problem I have with playing Mafia on this forum is that everyone is way too enthusiastic when it comes to one-off lynch votes. I'm not going to vote for Supershroom on the basis that he is good, and people are just way too trigger-happy when it comes to lynch votes, unless any substantial evidence comes out that should persuade me into voting for him. Sure, it might seem suspicious that he got his vote for Spinda in so early, but you would think the Mafia would come up with some convoluted reasoning on why they would vote to lynch someone off, instead of making them the target.

All in all, I think this bandwagon ideology is complete nonsense, and from all the games of Mafia I've played in other places, it's certainly one of the worst tactics you could pull off. I strongly suggest people put a stop to this, since it could cost you the game in the long run.

None of you seem to understand why we (or at least I) decided to lynch him:

Waddle Derp wrote:The problem with not voting is that we'd risk either Spinda dying, or we'd leave it up to RNG which is never a good idea; lynching Supershroom was the safest option considering the alternatives I just stated.

Even then, we waited for a rebuttal before voting.

From the very supicious vote Supershroom gave to Spinda, especially the sudden movement I'm voting for her too.

Pseudo-Dino wrote:L

Welp it's time to see what kind of luck our awful mafia logic gives us now.