Page 4 of 9

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:40 pm
by Willhart
My signature is pretty small, but I still remember placing like 700th somethng or so. It proabably means that most of the people here don't have signatures.

Edit: The pokey below my avatar is kinf of expanding it though actually.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:41 pm
by RudeGuy
MosaicMario wrote:I made my signature smaller by putting things in spoilers.
It's funny the fact that signatures with spoilered things like yours are still longer than mine, isn't it?

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:41 pm
by FanofSMBX
Huh, I thought that my signature was huge. I guess that that's what using spoilers can do. I also guess that this means that Super Mario Uprising secretly isn't so bad after all.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:03 pm
by lighthouse64
I responded to this topic... By increasing my sig size :p

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:28 pm
by Jdude60
not sure if it's a good thing or a bad thing that I made it on the list

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:30 pm
by PixelPest
Jdude60 wrote:not sure if it's a good thing or a bad thing that I made it on the list
It's a bad thing. It means that your signature sucks.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:45 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
Yo, let's not be hostile toward users that have their names on the list.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 9:35 pm
by Jdude60
PixelPest wrote:
Jdude60 wrote:not sure if it's a good thing or a bad thing that I made it on the list
It's a bad thing. It means that your signature sucks.
I'm aware of that

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 9:37 pm
by PixelPest
Joey wrote:Yo, let's not be hostile toward users that have their names on the list.
Sorry Joey.

It means your signature is appalling.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:04 pm
by Zeldamaster12
it's as if spoilers don't exist

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:33 pm
by Sevennights
Still people put to many enters in there.signatures
I should personally reduce some of mine
Its mainly the enters, I'm not.even sure im on the list

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:58 am
by Imaynotbehere4long
Zeldamaster12 wrote:it's as if spoilers don't exist
You make fun of us, but your sig is only 4 pixels smaller than 100th place at the time of this post.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 6:39 am
by Mable
In honor of all the people, i completly removed my signature so there is no more bitching to me

Best avatar now

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 10:32 am
by Metroidologist X7
Damn! How can be possible that I am in the list?

<signature hidden>

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:19 am
by Ness-Wednesday
I spoilered my project, it dosen't really do hat much of a difference...

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:33 am
by Mable
maybe you should spoiler the villager one also.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:46 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
To make it clear, nobody is required to change their signature just because it's listed in this thread. If we see a problem with your signature, we'll take care of it for you and then notify you about it.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:01 pm
by Zeldamaster12
Imaynotbehere4long wrote:
Zeldamaster12 wrote:it's as if spoilers don't exist
You make fun of us, but your sig is only 4 pixels smaller than 100th place at the time of this post.
When and where did I ever make fun of anyone?

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:27 pm
by Ness-Wednesday
Tinkerbell wrote:maybe you should spoiler the villager one also.
But I love Villagers. :(
I do think it's a good idea as well, it has been there showing off ever since I joined.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:01 pm
by Imaynotbehere4long
Zeldamaster12 wrote:
Imaynotbehere4long wrote:
Zeldamaster12 wrote:it's as if spoilers don't exist
You make fun of us, but your sig is only 4 pixels smaller than 100th place at the time of this post.
When and where did I ever make fun of anyone?
Okay, maybe my wording wasn't the best, but by saying "it's as if spoilers don't exist" in a thread ridiculing long signatures, it implies that you look down on people with long signatures, especially those who have text lists or large images that aren't in spoilers. I just wanted to point out that, despite your implied point of view, you only just barely didn't make the list yourself, making your post seem rather hypocritical.