Page 30 of 44
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:26 pm
by Turret 3471
LoganThePlumber wrote:practicalshorty014 wrote:LoganThePlumber wrote:
Didn't work! same problem happened
Are you sure you uninstalled SMBX, disabled your antivirus, and then downloaded SMBX again?
Before i registered an account to report this, i installed SMBX and it worked fine, until the next day. I had to reinstall it but the same problem happens
Instead of disabling your antivirus, delete it and get a new one like Malwarebytes. (o boi, advertising like a b0ss, lel)
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 9:17 pm
by LoganThePlumber
But if uninstall my antivirus, my computer's fucked
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 9:56 pm
by PixelPest
Turret 3471 wrote:LoganThePlumber wrote:practicalshorty014 wrote:
Are you sure you uninstalled SMBX, disabled your antivirus, and then downloaded SMBX again?
Before i registered an account to report this, i installed SMBX and it worked fine, until the next day. I had to reinstall it but the same problem happens
Instead of disabling your antivirus, delete it and get a new one like Malwarebytes. (o boi, advertising like a b0ss, lel)
One does not just delete the antivirus.
Most of them have settings and advanced configuration properties. You can usually either change the intensity/level to medium (I personally wouldn't put it on low, but just get it off high if it is) and often it will accept exceptions. You can do an Internet search to learn how to configure it in this manner. You should never need a new antivirus and to uninstall your current one unless it is not functioning properly at the highest level. Since it's functioning too well per se it's just about changing your settings
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 5:59 am
by Mable
The best antivirus is common sense.
Every other is flawed you should just know where and what you should download and what not
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 9:35 am
by Snessy the duck
Alternatively, try using the 2.0 open beta, which also has a lot more stuff than 1.3.0.1.
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 11:52 am
by Mable
His antivirus will probably delete that also since it's a hacked exe
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 3:01 pm
by ElectriKong
I have Avast and it does not delete my SMBX (it sometimes thinks it could be a problem, but it just scans it and realises it is fine).
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2017 6:09 pm
by Michael The Mario
some files are missing. i am sad
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 6:47 am
by Snessy the duck
Michael The Mario wrote:some files are missing. i am sad
What files are missing? Maybe your antivirus picked up some of these files and deleted them?
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 7:27 am
by Wohlstand
Snessy the duck wrote:Michael The Mario wrote:some files are missing. i am sad
What files are missing? Maybe your antivirus picked up some of these files and deleted them?
That possible, or another reason you wasn't unpacked game right, or you have downloaded damaged archive:
- Please compare the MD5 checksum bb9ce7325d321abfb4376c9354932c0f of SMBX 1.3.0.1.zip after download, and check out the size which must be 137 667 413 bytes.
- If you have trouble with your network, try the multi-tome archive: (50 + 50 + 23 MB) from here:
http://wohlsoft.ru/docs/SMBX_1.3.0.1/splitted/
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 12:53 pm
by Michael The Mario
i just reinstalled it sorry for WASTING YOUR PREEEEEEECIOUS TIME
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 2:27 pm
by ElectriKong
Michael The Mario wrote:i just reinstalled it sorry for WASTING YOUR PREEEEEEECIOUS TIME
So does it work now?
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 2:41 pm
by Mable
Michael The Mario wrote:i just reinstalled it sorry for WASTING YOUR PREEEEEEECIOUS TIME
Instead of yelling at people you could have provided a screen of your smbx folder which would have helped us to help you.
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 12:52 pm
by kr4k1n
Mable wrote:Michael The Mario wrote:i just reinstalled it sorry for WASTING YOUR PREEEEEEECIOUS TIME
Instead of yelling at people you could have provided a screen of your smbx folder which would have helped us to help you.
Was probably a bad attempt at a joke
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:36 am
by hrikin
Shadow Yoshi wrote:So, it dawned on me today that it's really bad that two save files, which likely belong to me, were included with the 1.3.0.1 downloads.
I fixed the ZIP but don't have the desire to fix the setup executable at this time.
In other news, SMBX 1.3.0.1 has been downloaded almost 300,000 times.
just fix it or this will be the fate of smbx
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:41 am
by Wohlstand
hrikin wrote:Shadow Yoshi wrote:So, it dawned on me today that it's really bad that two save files, which likely belong to me, were included with the 1.3.0.1 downloads.
I fixed the ZIP but don't have the desire to fix the setup executable at this time.
In other news, SMBX 1.3.0.1 has been downloaded almost 300,000 times.
just fix it or this will be the fate of smbx
He don't want to spend a time on rebuilding the installer
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:45 am
by hrikin
pls pls pls fix it the winrar version takes 10 whole minutes to download
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:56 am
by Wohlstand
hrikin wrote:pls pls pls fix it the winrar version takes 10 whole minutes to download
To unpack zip, WinRAR is not needed: the Windows (since Windows XP) has embedded support to unpack ZIP files - the "ZIP-Folders" feature. It must be at you. If you really need for separated archivator software, I suggestign you to take 7zip: it has 1.1 MB weight and it must be stored on server which is near to you :
http://www.7-zip.org/
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 11:19 am
by Cedur
hrikin wrote:pls pls pls fix it the winrar version takes 10 whole minutes to download
get 2.0?
Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:17 pm
by ElectriKong
Cedur wrote:hrikin wrote:pls pls pls fix it the winrar version takes 10 whole minutes to download
get 2.0?
Wouldn't that take longer though?