Page 28 of 55

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 6:21 am
by HeroLinik
Still in, beaten Tier 2. Now everything is getting serious from then on out.

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 6:31 am
by Zipper

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 6:36 am
by Dominodalek
I had hoped to at least score a little higher, but it's fair criticism.

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 6:45 am
by Mable
At least we attempted to make a ghost house and not a simple grass, castle, underground etc thing.

Also the boss was made like it is in smw. Why should it be harder if the level itself is hating you?
And, it's not that easy to make a vanilla ghost house using only vanilla ghost house tileset and stuff

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 6:50 am
by Ecruteak
HOLY SHIT I BEAT TIER 2

THIS IS THE FURTHEST I'VE BEEN IN A CONTEST

I WON'T EVEN MIND GETTING TIER 3, I'M JUST HAPPY I MADE IT THIS FAR

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:08 am
by Emral
Wraith Adamaknight more like Wraith Cantbebotheredtowriteproperreviews amirite

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:13 am
by Dominodalek
It would have been nice to get some constructive criticism from him, instead of more or less just "your level sucks", but hey.

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:21 am
by zlaker
lets just hope this contest turns out to be better than cc12

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:26 am
by PixelPest
Wow. You judges are total shit (except for EllTipista). My level wasn't even that hard and definitely not Kaizo. This was much easier than my CC12 level which scored around 5. Thanks to EllTipista for actually getting past the difficulty and writing a good review and shout out to Wraith Adamknight, the saddest excuse of a judge ever, who just complained about difficulty and didn't give a crap about the aesthetics, design, gimmicks, and atmosphere I worked hard to perfect in this level. So I hope in future contests we actually get some good judges who don't just whine about difficulty and be total assholes in their reviews

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:31 am
by zlaker
PixelPest wrote:Wow. You judges are total shit (except for EllTipista). My level wasn't even that hard and definitely not Kaizo. This was much easier than my CC12 level which scored around 5. Thanks to EllTipista for actually getting past the difficulty and writing a good review and shout out to Wraith Adamknight, the saddest excuse of a judge ever, who just complained about difficulty and didn't give a crap about the aesthetics, design, gimmicks, and atmosphere I worked hard to perfect in this level. So I hope in future contests we actually get some good judges who don't just whine about difficulty and be total assholes in their reviews
Image

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:33 am
by Zipper
PixelPest wrote:Wow. You judges are total shit (except for EllTipista). My level wasn't even that hard and definitely not Kaizo. This was much easier than my CC12 level which scored around 5. Thanks to EllTipista for actually getting past the difficulty and writing a good review and shout out to Wraith Adamknight, the saddest excuse of a judge ever, who just complained about difficulty and didn't give a crap about the aesthetics, design, gimmicks, and atmosphere I worked hard to perfect in this level. So I hope in future contests we actually get some good judges who don't just whine about difficulty and be total assholes in their reviews
you seem upset

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:33 am
by Marina
yikes.

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:36 am
by PixelPest
Zipper wrote:
PixelPest wrote:Wow. You judges are total shit (except for EllTipista). My level wasn't even that hard and definitely not Kaizo. This was much easier than my CC12 level which scored around 5. Thanks to EllTipista for actually getting past the difficulty and writing a good review and shout out to Wraith Adamknight, the saddest excuse of a judge ever, who just complained about difficulty and didn't give a crap about the aesthetics, design, gimmicks, and atmosphere I worked hard to perfect in this level. So I hope in future contests we actually get some good judges who don't just whine about difficulty and be total assholes in their reviews
you seem upset
No shit. I put a ton of effort into a level which got a three because the judges couldn't handle the difficulty, even though the level was barely difficult except for the one puzzle section where you had to kill the Boos by luring them under the Spiny generators

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:37 am
by Emral
PixelPest wrote:Wow. You judges are total shit (except for EllTipista). My level wasn't even that hard and definitely not Kaizo. This was much easier than my CC12 level which scored around 5. Thanks to EllTipista for actually getting past the difficulty and writing a good review and shout out to Wraith Adamknight, the saddest excuse of a judge ever, who just complained about difficulty and didn't give a crap about the aesthetics, design, gimmicks, and atmosphere I worked hard to perfect in this level. So I hope in future contests we actually get some good judges who don't just whine about difficulty and be total assholes in their reviews
I'm pretty sure Chad, Zipper, Wraith and bossedit all have the same point. I suggest taking their criticism rather than being an asshole about it. Chad gave a very detailed explanation about what made him not enjoy your level.

Saying "my level wasn't even that hard and definitely not Kaizo" is a bullshit statement if you don't have any proof from a third party to back it up for you. Have you sent your level to beta testers for feedback? If not, consider the 5 judges of this contest the feedback you would've gotten. I'd say your perception of the level is a clear case of "creator's bias™".

Please post your level to the forum so all of us can take a proper look.

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:38 am
by Mable
Wow we placed a lot shittier then you and we aren't offended by it.

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:39 am
by PixelPest
Enjl wrote:
Yes, I did have people beta test it and I'll post it later today

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:44 am
by zlaker
pixelpest rn
Image

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:46 am
by PixelPest
zlakergirl357 wrote:pixelpest rn
Image
I have to say, not 100% accurate because I'm probably closer to around 97-98% salt

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:14 am
by Quill
loving how who he claims to be the best judge is the person who gave him the highest score

Re: SVLC 2016

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:15 am
by ShadowStarX
Quill wrote:loving how who he claims to be the best judge is the person who gave him the highest score
That's usually the case unless the level is very overscored. (like the designer thinks it deserves a 7, he gets 6s, 7s and 8s but one judge gives it a 9.5)