Page 26 of 87

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 3:22 pm
by Zeldamaster12
If you see a bad quality post, report it and the staff will handle it.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 3:24 pm
by Mable
Zeldamaster12 wrote:If you see a bad quality post, report it and the staff will handle it.

The funfact tho is that ALMOST no one does that but replies to it.

No really if we go by that i think about 27% here use the report button.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2015 3:28 pm
by Zeldamaster12
And the people reacting to the bad posts shouldn't be doing so. It's the staff's responsibility to handle bad quality posts, not the user. The user's responsibility is to report the post and from there the staff will handle it.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:11 pm
by Murphmario
FanofSMBX wrote:
Joey wrote:Anybody who thought that post was useless CLEARLY didn't read all of it!!!
no
Reported.

And the staff were partly the reason the requests forum went down; they were the ones who made the rules.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:55 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
Yeah, because the people who make the rules are at fault.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 5:49 pm
by Mable
Let's just say... it was for good taking it down. People really made requests that nobody could do. You can still pm someone or.. just do it by yourself.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 8:32 pm
by lighthouse64
There's also some people on the artboard accepting requests.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2015 3:42 pm
by Imaynotbehere4long
What ever happened to the forum newsletter?

Also, I noticed that the front page of the wiki shows featured content, but it still shows Super Mario Legends part 1 as the featured episode when that was featured before Airship Attack.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2015 4:30 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
As far as I know, interest in the project diminished. Also, the wiki has been pretty much shut down temporarily until we have enough drive here to make it better.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:36 am
by lighthouse64
Well... Maybe we could make a newsletter page on the wiki ourselves (those who want it still)

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 5:58 am
by Squishy Rex
lighthouse64 wrote:Well... Maybe we could make a newsletter page on the wiki ourselves (those who want it still)
Problem is though, there isn't much interest unfortunately, plus the old Wiki's days are numbered essentially and it doesn't get much traffic as it is, so really, we'd be wasting our time at this point. It's a nice idea all the same however, it's just that putting a lot of time and effort into something that isn't as well received as you may have hoped is a real downer, which is something that almost always causes things to be abandoned sooner or later.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2015 10:02 am
by lighthouse64
Squishy Rex wrote:
lighthouse64 wrote:Well... Maybe we could make a newsletter page on the wiki ourselves (those who want it still)
Problem is though, there isn't much interest unfortunately, plus the old Wiki's days are numbered essentially and it doesn't get much traffic as it is, so really, we'd be wasting our time at this point. It's a nice idea all the same however, it's just that putting a lot of time and effort into something that isn't as well received as you may have hoped is a real downer, which is something that almost always causes things to be abandoned sooner or later.
Oh ok. Anyways, There was some kind of news page going on b4 at the wiki. If u search it up, you'll probably find it.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 1:10 pm
by Mable
So did this http://www.smbxgame.com/forums/v ... 06#p166106 just die by now? I mean there never was talk again about this suggestions actually which is pretty sad since it had a nice idea behind it all.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 1:23 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
The level system is fine as it is, in my opinion, and if we need to we can further restrict entry into The Best.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:01 pm
by Imaynotbehere4long
Speaking of stuff that died, whatever became of this? (I'm specifically referring to the "something else in store.")

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:17 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
Over the summer I was working on a quote database software but I never finished it.

IRC quotes thread won't come back regardless, though, because none of the quotes were good.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:16 pm
by Imaynotbehere4long
Joey wrote:IRC quotes thread won't come back regardless, though, because none of the quotes were good.
What about Forum's Funniest Posts? It was locked for the same reason, but no reason was given on that thread, which is why I linked to the IRC quotes topic. Plus, I felt that some of the quotes in the Forums Funniest Posts were pretty funny.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:25 pm
by aero
Nothing about those threads were funny, and if you think they were you just have poor taste.

When are we getting fail2ban for IRC?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:04 am
by aero
Nexia wrote:Out of curiosity, what's stopping us from having HTML5 YouTube <video> tags instead of flash?

I personally don't have the flash plugin installed for the main browser I use(out of preference), and it gets a bit annoying when I have to open Internet Explorer or another browser in order to view embedded YouTube videos in a thread with flash. I'd think flash is outdated by now for such things.

However I'm aware that this might be having to do with how the forum's software is coded/something backend.*shrug*
Bumping this out of interest.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:20 am
by XerX
AeroMatter wrote:
Nexia wrote:Out of curiosity, what's stopping us from having HTML5 YouTube <video> tags instead of flash?

I personally don't have the flash plugin installed for the main browser I use(out of preference), and it gets a bit annoying when I have to open Internet Explorer or another browser in order to view embedded YouTube videos in a thread with flash. I'd think flash is outdated by now for such things.

However I'm aware that this might be having to do with how the forum's software is coded/something backend.*shrug*
Bumping this out of interest.

BBCODE :

Code: Select all

[video]{URL}[/video]
HTML REPLACEMENT :

Code: Select all

<div class='bbvideo' data-url='{URL}' style='width: 640px; height: 390px; margin: 2px 0; display: inline-block; background: #000; color: #fff; overflow: hidden; vertical-align: bottom;'><div style='height: 100%;'><script>if (typeof bbmedia == 'undefined') { bbmedia = true; var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true; e.src = 'http://phpbbex.com/api/bbmedia.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(e, s); }</script></div><div style='text-align: right; height: 14px; margin-top: -14px; padding-right: 2px; font: 10px/10px Verdana; color: #555;'><a style='color: #105289; text-decoration: none;' href='http://phpbbex.com/' target='_blank'>phpBB</a> &#91;video&#93;</div></div>
HELP :

Code: Select all

Insert video: [video]http://youtube.com/url[/video]