Re: SVLC 2016
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 6:18 pm
"Hmm. I see! I definitely understand what is going on here."- JonTronbossedit8 wrote:My reaction to one single level right here from this contest:
"Hmm. I see! I definitely understand what is going on here."- JonTronbossedit8 wrote:My reaction to one single level right here from this contest:
Probably. That's the most professional way to do it.Catastrophe wrote:Wait, is Marina gonna post one tier a day? Like CC12?
I didn't. Take it from me, I made a serious level.Camacho wrote:Finally HYPE
can't wait too see who made the joke levels
I hope it's not my level.bossedit8 wrote:My reaction to one single level right here from this contest:
Spoiler: show
Oh, boo. Hopefully it won't take long and the reviews are revealed today or at the most, tomorrow.Marina wrote:Sorry guys, it's still gonna take a bit. ShadowStar has yet to review two levels that some of the other judges couldn't play or gave exceptionally unreasonable scores on.
Nah... it's just a level that uses those NPCs that goes beyond it's limits... basically. =PCamacho wrote:I hope it's not my level.Spoiler: show
Did Wraith give too many -1's?Marina wrote:Sorry guys, it's still gonna take a bit. ShadowStar has yet to review two levels that some of the other judges couldn't play or gave exceptionally unreasonable scores on.
*nervous sweating*Marina wrote: gave exceptionally unreasonable scores
I suppose it's one of the dummy npcs, eh?bossedit8 wrote:Nah... it's just a level that uses those NPCs that goes beyond it's limits... basically. =PCamacho wrote:I hope it's not my level.Spoiler: show
Marina wrote:Sorry guys, it's still gonna take a bit. ShadowStar has yet to review two levels that some of the other judges couldn't play or gave exceptionally unreasonable scores on.
Marina chewed my head off. Apparently it was against the rules to go below 0..even if I found a level to be absolute shit.ElTipsta wrote:Did Wraith give too many -1's?Marina wrote:Sorry guys, it's still gonna take a bit. ShadowStar has yet to review two levels that some of the other judges couldn't play or gave exceptionally unreasonable scores on.
I did think it was weird when you said you would give negative scores to levels... Do you know if you add a single negative value to an average that otherwise consists of positive ones, the result will be negative as well? That's a great way to guarantee the level a place from the absolute bottom of the results.as303298 wrote:Marina chewed my head off. Apparently it was against the rules to go below 0..even if I found a level to be absolute shit.
Then he questioned my methods further...but idc. If a level sucked it got nothing..end of story.
What I do know is that we are waiting on only Shadow Star right now, since he has a few rejected levels to judge in our stead.