Page 23 of 75

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:20 am
by Mable
I see more not common post habits in this forum than actual harassment

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:30 am
by Radiance
Spoiler: show
Mr Briney wrote:Statement A
Mr Briney wrote:Statement B
Mr Briney wrote:Statement C
Since Snessy says about annoying, I would like to tell that quote pyramids are sometimes annoying. Especially when only Statement A or this text outside of the spoiler is needed and people would just quote the whole post with many quotes instead of copying and pasting the necessary text that the person would want to discuss. I've seen a rule in a forum before (NSMBX maybe) about quote pyramids are being refrained. Or implementing a better quoting system would do.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:12 pm
by Snessy the duck
Mable wrote:I see more not common post habits in this forum than actual harassment
Yeah, that's why I feel it should be the default option.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:59 pm
by aero
Unless you're reporting people all of the time, which I don't know why you would be, it's not that big of a deal and just a very minor inconvenience at worst.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:42 pm
by Noodle
Where to post grafix requests?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 4:44 pm
by Mable
Nowhere they have been banned bc people kept requesting stuff that mostly was like 1 billion gfx that never got used anyway.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 6:07 pm
by timocomsmbx2345
Image

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:10 am
by ElectriKong
timocomsmbx2345 wrote:Image
I don't know the point, and it also is pretty hard to understand your post

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:40 am
by HeroLinik
timocomsmbx2345 wrote:
Spoiler: show
Image
This has been suggested way too many times and it's obviously not going to happen. Like, how will it benefit the site? Why do you want to include it? All it will do is end up getting abused much like smilies.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:47 am
by Danny
For the record, I'm not entirely sure it's possible in phpbb3 at the moment.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:16 am
by aero
Aero wrote:Idk if any of the staff have been given site access, so this is more towards Joey:

A lot of people are irritated with signature sizes. People have a bunch of spoilers, images, and junk nobody wants to see in them. I made this script that adds scrollbars to signatures larger than 200px, and the only change to the CSS code is altering one setting and adding one line. People don't want to rely on a script so I'm just going to throw this suggestion out there. In the content.css search for .signature and change overflow: hidden; to overflow: auto; and add max-height: 200px;. Should look like this when you're done:

Code: Select all

/* Post signature */
.signature {
	margin-top: 1.5em;
	padding-top: 0.2em;
	font-size: 1.1em;
	border-top: 1px solid transparent;
	clear: left;
	line-height: 140%;
	overflow: auto;
   max-height: 200px;
	width: 100%;
}
Joey wrote:
Quoting this to bring it up again because it got side tracked right away.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:56 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
Signatures now have a maximum vertical size of 300px before a scrollbar appears.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:11 am
by TLtimelord
I love you too, Joey.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:12 am
by aero
Thanks, this was needed very much.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:17 am
by kr4k1n
It's about time this was done.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:26 am
by Thehelmetguy1
Ahhhhhh, nice. I am also thinking on changing my signature to make it smaller and simple

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:26 am
by PersonNamedUser
perfecto

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:06 am
by Quantix
I'm surprised that feature got implemented so quickly.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 10:43 am
by Snessy the duck
I know I've asked this question before, but why exactly are we still hosting the irc chat? It just seems kinda pointless to me since we have discord.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 10:44 am
by Mable
Snessy the duck wrote:I know I've asked this question before, but why exactly are we still hosting the irc chat? It just seems kinda pointless to me since we have discord.
I guess you could say some people don't want to switch to better things and use the irc.