Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Yeah agreed, and the more townies we lose the closer we are to losing.

Nato wrote:We can take a literal shot in the dark to get ahead.

I think we have nothing to lose.

Honestly that kind of thinking seems somewhat mafia-like. Not saying you are mafia, but it would certainly help them if we did that.

it would, but at the same time he's not totally wrong; we have nothing to go on right this second

granted i don't support random lynching either, so i think we just wait out the night or some shit

the problem is that we have literally nothing concrete to go on now, and we've presumably lost our inspector since ragont managed to identify someone night 1. in other words, we're probably not going to GET something concrete. honestly, we need to look back through everything that's taken place and see if there's any evidence we missed along the line. cause if our only basis for lynching is gonna be "seems suspicious", we've got serious problems.

HenryRichard wrote:

Nato wrote:We can take a literal shot in the dark to get ahead.

I think we have nothing to lose.

Honestly that kind of thinking seems somewhat mafia-like. Not saying you are mafia, but it would certainly help them if we did that.

Please explain why that seems mafia like.
Or don't and tell me wether you agree with this or not.

Mafia would never want to the vigilante to shoot. They are already fated to win shortly, so shooting someone is unnecessary and risky. Sure, it can be the last nail for us as town, but at the same time it has the chance of bringing us back into the game.


At this point, were not going to get something concrete as I'm pretty sure the sheriff is either not going to speak and/or is dead. Right now were sitting on our thumbs waiting for results that aren't going to happen while were slowly going to die off before it's too late, which it's almost if not to that point anyway.


So from my perspective, we go for broke and try and get back into the game or we just lose the game.

Shooting for random people is definitely not a good strategy.

"What have we got to lose" The game maybe? Shooting random people will help nothing, and this makes me think you're trying to make the Town self-destruct by killing random people until there's nothing left.

Nice third person "The Town"

If I wanted us to self destruct, then I would simply leave it be and let psuedo-random lynches determine the town's fate. I say psuedo because the mafia surely will help mafia not get lynched.

Once Joey dies/Curist doesn't heal, it's game over indefinitely. You tell me which is more self destructive.


Or are you going to tell me that random lynching with no evidence isn't just as destructive as shooting someone with no evidence? The end result is the same, if we kill an innocent it's game over but if we kill a mafia were still in the game.

IN THIS MAGICAL EVEENING, SOME FUCKIGN GUY GOT DUMPSTERED

qig HAS BEN SENT TO THE FUCKING STONE AGE!

IT IS DAY 4, NIGHT 5 WILL BEGIN AT 6 PM PST TOMORROW

well fuck

#losingmafia2015

*#losingmafia2016 lmao

Nato wrote:Nice third person "The Town"

If I wanted us to self destruct, then I would simply leave it be and let psuedo-random lynches determine the town's fate. I say psuedo because the mafia surely will help mafia not get lynched.

Once Joey dies/Curist doesn't heal, it's game over indefinitely. You tell me which is more self destructive.


Or are you going to tell me that random lynching with no evidence isn't just as destructive as shooting someone with no evidence? The end result is the same, if we kill an innocent it's game over but if we kill a mafia were still in the game.

I'm sorry if you want to point fingers over something so small. "The Town" as in all of us. I could've said we, and it'd correlate to the exact same thing.

Lynching off randoms is the exact same as shooting randoms at night. There's a possibility that we could get a Mafioso yeah, but the chances aren't exactly high. So stop acting as if killing randoms at night is safer than lynching off randoms. After all, Joey loses his ability for two nights if he doesn't get a Mafioso. That'd do more harm than good and you know this.

Oh, shit. There's only one special left - Joey (aside from not very chill dudes). This is not looking good.

mettaton was the curist
ragont was the inspector
qig was the weapon master

and i was the heir,now i'm the weapon master and i chose someone i can trust

but the night before qig died he left a log
"<Joey> hi
<Zeldamaster12> yes
<Joey> what do you think of my recent accusation against Khon
<Zeldamaster12> i mean
<Zeldamaster12> it's logical
<Zeldamaster12> not 100 percent sure if it's accurate
<Zeldamaster12> but there's a possibility and if it comes down to it we need to lynch someone
<Zeldamaster12> and as far as im aware there's no other leads
<Joey> do you think it'd be easy to fake a silencing?
<Zeldamaster12> yeah
<Zeldamaster12> it's called
<Zeldamaster12> don't post in the thread lol
<Joey> k, well, here's the thing
<Joey> i'm the weapons master
<Zeldamaster12> are you the heir or the original?
<Joey> and to try to form an alliance, I upgraded Ragont
<Joey> OG
<Zeldamaster12> thought you were the vigi though
<Joey> nah, Mettaton was, once I claimed vigi he counterclaimed in PM for some reason and we worked it out from there
<Joey> anyway, so Ragont is upgraded
<Joey> and you were inspected
<Joey> and you came up red
<Joey> I have my hunches you're the voodoo lady
<Joey> given the pattern of word choice
<Zeldamaster12> elaborate
<Joey> elaborate on what?
<Zeldamaster12> how i worded what i worded
<Zeldamaster12> or something
<Joey> well, the word had to be >=7 letters, right?
<Zeldamaster12> yeah
<Joey> why?
<Zeldamaster12> how am i supposed to know lol, nien made the game not me
<Joey> right.
<Joey> i'll see you on the other side."


Zeldamaster12

I trust Joey, so Zeldamaster12.

alright hold the phone

if ragont left that log for Joey, joey had to have known YESTERDAY about it
he doesn't tell us about it yesterday and then despite allegedly being the vigi (or now he says not which would make the lack of a counterclaim on vigi null), doesn't vigi zeldamaster last night?

i'm calling some serious fucking bull on that

Joey, and i'm fairly sure khon is his partner

yeah alright no joey

you can't just say you KNEW somebody was mafia, didn't tell us until NOW, and then expect us to not suspect you like i'm sorry but this is absurdly dumb

ragont is like actually dead and can't confirm this so

Joey

and if you're mafia i'm afraid khon is implicated here too

Yeah gotta say that that is very suspect on Joey's part.

I definitely want to see what Joey and Zeldamaster have to say about this but

Joey

oh great now I don't even know what to do
I mean qig said khon isn't mafia, and when he died his name was pink so he was either the weapons master's heir who was mafia or, more likely, on the town's side.
but I can see it happening
so maybe Joey is mafia - the fact he hasn't died yet even though he's the vig is somewhat odd.
Changing vote from Zeldamaster12 to Joey