Winter Contest: The Winner and the Runner-up

Chip Potato · Postby **Chip Potato** » Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:25 pm

zlakergirl357 wrote:While though it's obvious that most contest levels has more than one section, you're still not allowed to share any info about your level publicly.

That's not really information about a specific level, though. Like, if I said I lived in a house, you wouldn't be able to discern where I live because there are millions and millions of houses across the globe.

DatDude · Postby **DatDude** » Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:18 pm

zlakergirl357 wrote:While though it's obvious that most contest levels has more than one section, you're still not allowed to share any info about your level publicly.

Cr@p, forgot about that. Anyways, edited my message.

MECHDRAGON777 · Postby **MECHDRAGON777** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:32 am

Only thirty-nine users sent there level I. So far!

Mr Pancake Guy · Postby **Mr Pancake Guy** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:43 am

Whoa finnaly done.

I had to finish early, I have finals, otherwise my level would be much better, but I can't control faith!

MECHDRAGON777 · Postby **MECHDRAGON777** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:45 am

Mr Pancake Guy wrote:Whoa finnaly done.

I had to finish early, I have finals, otherwise my level would be much better, but I can't control faith!

That makes 40, but I also have midterms/finals! I think every one does!

Flying Brick · Postby **Flying Brick** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:54 am

Make that 41. I didn't even know it was possible to work that fast! Now let's hope it paid off...

JupiHornet · Postby **JupiHornet** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 9:09 am

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:
Mr Pancake Guy wrote:Whoa finnaly done.

I had to finish early, I have finals, otherwise my level would be much better, but I can't control faith!
That makes 40, but I also have midterms/finals! I think every one does!

I don't

But yeah, this contest came pretty unexpectedly to most people. But it seems like CC11 is gonna be huge.

Postby **Willhart** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:35 am

Turtwig wrote:
MECHDRAGON777 wrote:
Mr Pancake Guy wrote:Whoa finnaly done.

I had to finish early, I have finals, otherwise my level would be much better, but I can't control faith!
That makes 40, but I also have midterms/finals! I think every one does!
I don't

But yeah, this contest came pretty unexpectedly to most people. But it seems like CC11 is gonna be huge.

Also, no one advertised LC10 on the SMW Central or the Talkhaus, which means some people might have missed it.

zlaker · Postby **zlaker** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 1:15 pm

fireflowerhour wrote:
zlakergirl357 wrote:While though it's obvious that most contest levels has more than one section, you're still not allowed to share any info about your level publicly.
That's not really information about a specific level, though. Like, if I said I lived in a house, you wouldn't be able to discern where I live because there are millions and millions of houses across the globe.

Yes, but the rule says you're not suppose to release info about your level.

Chip Potato · Postby **Chip Potato** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 4:47 pm

zlakergirl357 wrote:
fireflowerhour wrote:
zlakergirl357 wrote:While though it's obvious that most contest levels has more than one section, you're still not allowed to share any info about your level publicly.
That's not really information about a specific level, though. Like, if I said I lived in a house, you wouldn't be able to discern where I live because there are millions and millions of houses across the globe.
Yes, but the rule says you're not suppose to release info about your level.

I know.

It's not really info on your level, however, if it can easily be applied to the vast majority of levels on this site, and in general. It's too broad to be information on any specific level.

JupiHornet · Postby **JupiHornet** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 4:56 pm

Quick question:
Is CC11 going to be 3 months after this contest or 3 months after the date that the contest SHOULD HAVE been?

zlaker · Postby **zlaker** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:00 pm

How is it not information about your level when you've said publicly that you haven't finished off the third of your level? That is information about your level and that implies that your level has at least two sections. If you've revealed anything about your level then you've broken the rule, even though revealing the amount of sections shouldn't be counted as disqualification.

Chip Potato · Postby **Chip Potato** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:07 pm

zlakergirl357 wrote:How is it not information about your level when you've said publicly that you haven't finished off the third of your level? That is information about your level and that implies that your level has at least two sections. If you've revealed anything about your level then you've broken the rule, even though revealing the amount of sections shouldn't be counted as disqualification.

Okay, yes, the comment proves the level has two sections. That's still not enough for disqualification, imo, because we do not know anything else about the level. We don't know its theme, objective, tilesets being used, etc. And I don't believe the length of the sections were mentioned, either. Plus, we don't know how many sections there are exactly, only that there are at least two. This information is too vague to be disqualification-worthy.

zlaker · Postby **zlaker** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:09 pm

I never said it's disqualification-worthy, though.

MECHDRAGON777 · Postby **MECHDRAGON777** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:10 pm

fireflowerhour wrote:
zlakergirl357 wrote:How is it not information about your level when you've said publicly that you haven't finished off the third of your level? That is information about your level and that implies that your level has at least two sections. If you've revealed anything about your level then you've broken the rule, even though revealing the amount of sections shouldn't be counted as disqualification.
Okay, yes, the comment proves the level has two sections. That's still not enough for disqualification, imo, because we do not know anything else about the level. We don't know its theme, objective, tilesets being used, etc. And I don't believe the length of the sections were mentioned, either. Plus, we don't know how many sections there are exactly, only that there are at least two. This information is too vague to be disqualification-worthy.

It is good to see "@DatDude" has nice supporters, so ican thank you for fighting so to speak!

Chip Potato · Postby **Chip Potato** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:31 pm

zlakergirl357 wrote:I never said it's disqualification-worthy, though.

Wow, okay, that's definitely a lie, because you saying exactly that, is the reason we're even arguing over this.

JupiHornet · Postby **JupiHornet** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:33 pm

fireflowerhour wrote:
zlakergirl357 wrote:I never said it's disqualification-worthy, though.
Wow, okay, that's definitely a lie, because you saying exactly that, is the reason we're even arguing over this.

MECHDRAGON777 · Postby **MECHDRAGON777** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:42 pm

zlakergirl357 wrote:How is it not information about your level when you've said publicly that you haven't finished off the third of your level? That is information about your level and that implies that your level has at least two sections. If you've revealed anything about your level then you've broken the rule, even though revealing the amount of sections shouldn't be counted as disqualification.

There is proof he did not say he hours be is disqualified!

zlaker · Postby **zlaker** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:51 pm

fireflowerhour wrote:
zlakergirl357 wrote:I never said it's disqualification-worthy, though.
Wow, okay, that's definitely a lie, because you saying exactly that, is the reason we're even arguing over this.

I was stating the fact that he revealed information about his level and that he had broken the rule.

TLtimelord · Postby **TLtimelord** » Mon Dec 15, 2014 6:17 pm

Saying he has a third section doesn't really narrow down to make much of a difference. DatDude is just fine. Albeit it may not have been a very smart thing to say .