m4sterbr0s wrote:To start off, holding an election was probably the best thing to do. Just having a random user replace my position as Global Moderator would have annoyed people even more. In my opinion, I would consider that biased. We held the election because we wanted to see which users recognized potential candidates for the position, along with having a few choices to choose from for the job.
Quoting Knux: Choosing "randomly" a user the staff thinks it would fit for the GMod job would be more biased than choosing between 5 elected judged on personal likings such as good level designer or a friend? Honestly, I really doubt it. No, to be even more frank, you're wrong, all of you. There wouldn't be any bias, there never was considering that's what the staff has been doing over the past years on many forums, and the user base of the such wasn't this disturbed, ever.
m4sterbr0s wrote:Kley showed that he deserved the job. He's been active here on the forums, along with being active in previous SMBX forums, being a level judge almost every time. In addition, he played a huge role in beta testing SMBX when it was still being updated. So, I think it's only fair that he should deserve the position.
Wait, you're basing it on his history? That's even more biased. He clearly IS indeed active, and he currently helps the community being a level judge, although I personally did not see so many reviews from him. But the fact he has been on other forums and that he beta tested SMBX when it was still on development has nothing to do with our current situation. Just as Reizenni wasn't considereted for even being accepted on the elections, this kind of judgement shouldn't have been given. There are limits on how biased someone can get.
m4sterbr0s wrote:The reason Blueoak was not chosen was because of his previous actions in the past as a global moderator. The Admin team wasn't convinced that Blueoak fully changed his ways, and even though he's improved his actions, there's still more he has to do to prove himself worthy of being a global moderator in the future once more.
In other words, you're afriad of such situation to repeat. It's an understandable reason. Though, people often change, sometimes to bad and sometimes to good, and not letting that person fix his mistakes is the biggest kind of ignorace you could possibly give to someone. Although I really dobut that would be your intention guys, not letting Blueoak prove he has changed is like not letting a school student who has done a lot of antics prove he has changed by not letting him take a test or an exam even though his calification isn't that bad. Again, that's also somewhat biased. It is still understandable though, many Admins run accross these situations and it's not easy, it clearly isn't.
m4sterbr0s wrote:Darkmatt wasn't chosen for the job because of the way he moderates. As a former moderator, Darkmatt was known for being a bit too strict at times, and we didn't want a global moderator handing out warnings and bans over small problems.
I can understand that, he shows signs of being that way before.
m4sterbr0s wrote:It really came down to GhostHawk and Natsu. We chose GhostHawk over Natsu mainly because of his dedication towards improving the SMBX wiki. Other than that, both GhostHawk and Natsu are equally active and good people on the forums.
I also put some dedication but couldn't keep working on it since I had to do some stuff IRL. But I guess that can't be called an excuse.
m4sterbr0s wrote:I'd like to say this, however: Joey was NOT biased about these decisions, nor us. Both GhostHawk and Kley deserve their positions because they are good users, and they have both been involved with improving and helping SMBX.
I agree about GhostHawk, but I'm not entirely sure about Kley though, as I explained how major of the reasons you stipulated shouldn't be taken into consideration.
m4sterbr0s wrote:More importantly, you guys should be thankful that there is still a SMBX forum today. What if there was not a forum? There wouldn't be anymore SMBX. There wouldn't be anymore interactions. There wouldn't be any more contests, etc. SMBX would have dwindled and die at this point.
Oh, I am thankful for having a place to be. But I still don't agree with the decissions the staff has taken, not just that, the fact that we don't get answers like yours so often is one of the things that bother me the most.
m4sterbr0s wrote:Instead of criticizing Joey and wishing bad luck upon him in the future as an Administrator, start off by at least thanking the dude for setting up a SMBX forum that brought a lot of users together again, in addition to looking like the very first SMBX forum some of us we used to be part of. That is all.
I feel this message goes toward my post. I never wished bad luck upon Joey, I said he is not doing things right, and because of that he would probably go throughout a storm of bad-administration. That's not wishing bad luck, that's guessing the future based on how things haven't changed.