Page 3 of 12

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:26 am
by MECHDRAGON777
It is also possible for the Stranger to double kill.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:49 am
by ShadowStarX
Damn it seems like we've got a naughty vigi.
I really hope that they aren't going to go on a massacre on a nightly basis.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:49 am
by ElectriKong
MECHDRAGON777 wrote:It is also possible for the Stranger to double kill.
Why would he use his third ability night 1 though?

And if you are the madman, don't kill if there are no leads.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (NIGHT 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:01 am
by Warlock
Witchking666 wrote:So the stranger is essentially a serial killer on crack?
Definitely seems like it.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:04 pm
by TLtimelord
thehelmetguy1 wrote:This is why the vigi needs to get a punishment for killing town members.
Lol no it doesn't. That would defeat the purpose of using your vigilante power if you got punished for making a mistake. The punishment is making it that much harder for town, not taking power away. I hate you for thinking that.
ShadowStarX wrote:Damn it seems like we've got a naughty vigi.
I really hope that they aren't going to go on a massacre on a nightly basis.
We don't yet know if the vigi killed a green. Don't make an assumption so quickly. However, they should be more careful.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:07 pm
by TLtimelord
Thg1 and SSX, I'd like to know why you're so quick to assume the vigilante killed a Townie.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:22 pm
by Thehelmetguy1
I never said that the vigi killed a townie

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:24 pm
by ShadowStarX
I never said that either.
I only said that the vigi is most likely naughty. (but careless might be a better word for it)

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:43 pm
by TLtimelord
Yeah, you guys didn't say it outright. You two were quick to imply the vigi's kill was a mistake. We don't know if it was or not.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:55 pm
by ElectriKong
He still should have not killed, even if he did kill Pseudo, it was only by chance alone that she was red.
We don't even have sufficient leads to warrent killing anyone.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:59 pm
by Thehelmetguy1
An incompetent vigilante does more harm than good, so if the vigi killed someone tonight, don't do it again until we get an actual lead

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:12 pm
by Warlock
Heyhey this is a post

In all seriousness, the vigi killing last night was a fairly risky move. Let's hope one of the three is a Werewolf / one of them half-things or we're in some trouble.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:28 pm
by xDestroy
In all seriousness, the vigi killing last night was a fairly risky move. Let's hope one of the three is a Werewolf / one of them half-things or we're in some trouble.
Honestly, I hope the stranger did a double attack and if the werewolves are inactive then there will be no kills (unless reckless vigi comes back)

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:49 pm
by 116taj
So no one has any leads? at this rate i might snipevote again But are we really going to leave it as a kitb?

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:08 pm
by xDestroy
116taj wrote:So no one has any leads? at this rate i might snipevote again But are we really going to leave it as a kitb?
Yeah on one hand its normal to not have a lead in day 1 but on another its very weird.... and on the other hand DO NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT SNIPE VOTING!

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:14 pm
by MECHDRAGON777
Only lead we have is 116taj for his last post.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 1)

Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 12:20 am
by Danny
DAY 1 HAS ENDED.

And no one in the town had cast a lynch vote. Because they knew they had to kill someone during the day, they had put the names of everyone in a hat, and have pulled out the name of Sanct, who was promptly killed.

IT IS NOW NIGHT 2. NIGHT WILL END AT 12 AM EST ON SEPTEMBER 20TH.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (NIGHT 2)

Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 12:27 am
by TLtimelord
Alright, well, tomorrow, we are voting someone. We need to stop being so goddamn apathetic and start taking risks. If we end up in the same situation tomorrow, I'm going to act upon my hunches before we lose someone like Sanct. It is now that much easier for the third party to win.

Based on who would kill witchking and/or Cedur, I'm putting ShadowStarX and Thehelmetguy1 on my suspicion list. They felt somewhat quick to judge on the idea that the vigilante made a mistake, which would imply they assumed Pseudo was an innocent red.

One more thing: Vigilante, if you weren't sanct, hold off for tonight.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (NIGHT 2)

Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 1:29 am
by MECHDRAGON777
Well, this is just great. I should have voted. This is he worst of the worst.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (NIGHT 2)

Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:24 am
by ElectriKong
TLtimelord wrote: Based on who would kill witchking and/or Cedur, I'm putting ShadowStarX and Thehelmetguy1 on my suspicion list. They felt somewhat quick to judge on the idea that the vigilante made a mistake, which would imply they assumed Pseudo was an innocent red.
It is very likely though that the vigilante killed. And it is only by chance alone that Pseudo was red. And even if the vigilante killed a mafioso, since it was only chance, then he still made a mistake. And it could be the vigilante did not kill Pseudo, but one of the greens, and was instead the TP. If she was the Miller, then it could have even been the Mafia killing her. Please don't try defending the vigilante against his mistakes, it only suggests to him that he was doing the right thing and should continue to kill despite there being leads. It is not who he killed that was the mistake, it was the fact he killed that was the mistake.

And what are you suspecting SSX and THG1 for?