M44: Midnight on the Docks (TOWN VICTORY)

MECHDRAGON777 · Postby **MECHDRAGON777** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:26 am

It is also possible for the Stranger to double kill.

Postby **ShadowStarX** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:49 am

Damn it seems like we've got a naughty vigi.
I really hope that they aren't going to go on a massacre on a nightly basis.

Postby **ElectriKong** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:49 am

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:It is also possible for the Stranger to double kill.

Why would he use his third ability night 1 though?

And if you are the madman, don't kill if there are no leads.

Warlock · Postby **Warlock** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:01 am

Witchking666 wrote:So the stranger is essentially a serial killer on crack?

Definitely seems like it.

TLtimelord · Postby **TLtimelord** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:04 pm

thehelmetguy1 wrote:This is why the vigi needs to get a punishment for killing town members.

Lol no it doesn't. That would defeat the purpose of using your vigilante power if you got punished for making a mistake. The punishment is making it that much harder for town, not taking power away. I hate you for thinking that.

ShadowStarX wrote:Damn it seems like we've got a naughty vigi.
I really hope that they aren't going to go on a massacre on a nightly basis.

We don't yet know if the vigi killed a green. Don't make an assumption so quickly. However, they should be more careful.

TLtimelord · Postby **TLtimelord** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:07 pm

Thg1 and SSX, I'd like to know why you're so quick to assume the vigilante killed a Townie.

Thehelmetguy1 · Postby **Thehelmetguy1** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:22 pm

I never said that the vigi killed a townie

Postby **ShadowStarX** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:24 pm

I never said that either.
I only said that the vigi is most likely naughty. (but careless might be a better word for it)

TLtimelord · Postby **TLtimelord** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:43 pm

Yeah, you guys didn't say it outright. You two were quick to imply the vigi's kill was a mistake. We don't know if it was or not.

Postby **ElectriKong** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:55 pm

He still should have not killed, even if he did kill Pseudo, it was only by chance alone that she was red.
We don't even have sufficient leads to warrent killing anyone.

Thehelmetguy1 · Postby **Thehelmetguy1** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:59 pm

An incompetent vigilante does more harm than good, so if the vigi killed someone tonight, don't do it again until we get an actual lead

Warlock · Postby **Warlock** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:12 pm

Heyhey this is a post

In all seriousness, the vigi killing last night was a fairly risky move. Let's hope one of the three is a Werewolf / one of them half-things or we're in some trouble.

xDestroy · Postby **xDestroy** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:28 pm

In all seriousness, the vigi killing last night was a fairly risky move. Let's hope one of the three is a Werewolf / one of them half-things or we're in some trouble.

Honestly, I hope the stranger did a double attack and if the werewolves are inactive then there will be no kills (unless reckless vigi comes back)

116taj · Postby **116taj** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:49 pm

So no one has any leads? at this rate i might snipevote again But are we really going to leave it as a kitb?

xDestroy · Postby **xDestroy** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:08 pm

116taj wrote:So no one has any leads? at this rate i might snipevote again But are we really going to leave it as a kitb?

Yeah on one hand its normal to not have a lead in day 1 but on another its very weird.... and on the other hand DO NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT SNIPE VOTING!

MECHDRAGON777 · Postby **MECHDRAGON777** » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:14 pm

Only lead we have is 116taj for his last post.

Danny · Postby **Danny** » Tue Sep 19, 2017 12:20 am

DAY 1 HAS ENDED.

And no one in the town had cast a lynch vote. Because they knew they had to kill someone during the day, they had put the names of everyone in a hat, and have pulled out the name of Sanct, who was promptly killed.

IT IS NOW NIGHT 2. NIGHT WILL END AT 12 AM EST ON SEPTEMBER 20TH.

TLtimelord · Postby **TLtimelord** » Tue Sep 19, 2017 12:27 am

Alright, well, tomorrow, we are voting someone. We need to stop being so goddamn apathetic and start taking risks. If we end up in the same situation tomorrow, I'm going to act upon my hunches before we lose someone like Sanct. It is now that much easier for the third party to win.

Based on who would kill witchking and/or Cedur, I'm putting ShadowStarX and Thehelmetguy1 on my suspicion list. They felt somewhat quick to judge on the idea that the vigilante made a mistake, which would imply they assumed Pseudo was an innocent red.

One more thing: Vigilante, if you weren't sanct, hold off for tonight.

MECHDRAGON777 · Postby **MECHDRAGON777** » Tue Sep 19, 2017 1:29 am

Well, this is just great. I should have voted. This is he worst of the worst.

Postby **ElectriKong** » Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:24 am

TLtimelord wrote: Based on who would kill witchking and/or Cedur, I'm putting ShadowStarX and Thehelmetguy1 on my suspicion list. They felt somewhat quick to judge on the idea that the vigilante made a mistake, which would imply they assumed Pseudo was an innocent red.

It is very likely though that the vigilante killed. And it is only by chance alone that Pseudo was red. And even if the vigilante killed a mafioso, since it was only chance, then he still made a mistake. And it could be the vigilante did not kill Pseudo, but one of the greens, and was instead the TP. If she was the Miller, then it could have even been the Mafia killing her. Please don't try defending the vigilante against his mistakes, it only suggests to him that he was doing the right thing and should continue to kill despite there being leads. It is not who he killed that was the mistake, it was the fact he killed that was the mistake.

And what are you suspecting SSX and THG1 for?