Page 3 of 4
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2017 11:31 am
by Snessy the duck
A million times 2.0, no contest.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:03 am
by Pilzinsel64
Mr Boboo wrote:Oh man, 2.0 all the way. 1.4 is buggier and messier than even the original SMBX, and that says a lot.
What?
This is verry long time ago.
Now SMBX 1.4.4 is very stable and includes much of interesting features.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 12:35 pm
by Thehelmetguy1
Beta 4 was promised to add over 100 new NPCs. I prefer 2.0, but guys, let's please respect opinions. Not intending to be dead serious or boring, but you are going a bit too far with this. If anything, you are discouraging people to give 2.0 a go.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 9:42 pm
by HenryRichard
I mean 1.4 is pretty impressive, and to the best of my knowledge it's the only finished recreation of SMBX. 2.0 is better mostly because everything they're doing is open source and it's got full backwards compatibility.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:25 am
by Snessy the duck
HenryRichard wrote:I mean 1.4 is pretty impressive, and to the best of my knowledge it's the only finished recreation of SMBX. 2.0 is better mostly because everything they're doing is open source and it's got full backwards compatibility.
Plus the physics don't suck.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:06 pm
by timocomsmbx2345
thehelmetguy1 wrote:When beta 4 comes, 1.4 will be pretty much obsolete, as KoE said.
Well i said it first.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:31 pm
by loop
timocomsmbx2345 wrote:thehelmetguy1 wrote:When beta 4 comes, 1.4 will be pretty much obsolete, as KoE said.
Well i said it first.
Who cares? I sure don't.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:50 pm
by PixelPest
timocomsmbx2345 wrote:thehelmetguy1 wrote:When beta 4 comes, 1.4 will be pretty much obsolete, as KoE said.
Well i said it first.
Not everything's about you, nor is it a contest. I don't think it really matters at all
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:52 pm
by timocomsmbx2345
PixelPest wrote:timocomsmbx2345 wrote:thehelmetguy1 wrote:When beta 4 comes, 1.4 will be pretty much obsolete, as KoE said.
Well i said it first.
Not everything's about you, nor is it a contest. I don't think it really matters at all
i heard there was a mirror about beta 4, and ican't belive i missed it.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:54 pm
by PixelPest
I don't think you know what a mirror is in the context I was referring to earlier (it's just an alternate download for Beta 3, Beta 4 was never mentioned) and that has absolutely nothing to do with this topic afaik
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:18 am
by FireyPaperMario
timocomsmbx2345 wrote:thehelmetguy1 wrote:When beta 4 comes, 1.4 will be pretty much obsolete, as KoE said.
Well i said it first.
I don't give a damn who said it first anyways!!!
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Mon May 01, 2017 12:15 pm
by ElectriKong
timocomsmbx2345 wrote:PixelPest wrote:timocomsmbx2345 wrote:
Well i said it first.
Not everything's about you, nor is it a contest. I don't think it really matters at all
i heard there was a mirror about beta 4, and ican't belive i missed it.
There is no beta 4 download and there was no beta 4 download. It was an alternative beta 3. No beta 4 has ever been released.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Mon May 01, 2017 12:34 pm
by Thehelmetguy1
^
Beta 4 is not even done
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:08 pm
by TDK
SMBX 1.4.4 because the testing works for me.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:17 pm
by The0x539
TheDinoKing wrote:SMBX 1.4.4 because it has proper testing.
???
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:31 pm
by Mable
2.0 also has proper testing?
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 6:40 pm
by kr4k1n
both because i dont care which is actually better
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 8:08 pm
by TLtimelord
TheDinoKing wrote:SMBX 1.4.4 because it has proper testing.
LunaTester. Fully functional tester.
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 10:26 pm
by Egg
I don't like smbx 2.0 because the people working on it are bad
Re: SMBX 1.4.4 vs SMBX 2.0
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 12:08 am
by Ruan555
practicalshorty014 wrote:both because i dont care which is actually better