M30: We are the 70.58% - Joint Politicians/Third Party Victory

[Zeldamaster12]

PixelPest, that's actually a pretty good point, and I'd rather have Supershroom voted for than Spinda.

Supershroom, either tell us why you're innocent (same with Nuclear_Blaze) or I'm placing a vote on you.

[MECHDRAGON777]

I am suspicious of the one who voted Spinda as well. I am not voting for PixelPest and Zeldamaster's comments...

[PixelPest]

Supershroom, either tell us why you're innocent (same with Nuclear_Blaze) or I'm placing a vote on you.

Me too. And it would be nice to know too why you were suspicious of Spinda, Supershroom, as well as why you wanted to so quickly try to take the attention away from Supershroom, Nuclear_Blaze

[Nuclear_Blaze]

Well, I just wanted everyone to calm done and have no one do anything irrational, like Supershroom did, when we don't really have anything to go off of yet. (No offense to you Supershroom)

[Sevennights]

Sorry for being late,
So why is Spnda being voted out of random?

[underFlo]

Please don't make open suggestions on who the cop should check, you only help the Mafia painter by doing so.
Also, bear in mind that there's a 20% chance that PPX was the Hippie, so it'd make sense for the Mafia to claim first: if the actual Hippie is dead, they seem super trustworthy, while if he's still alive, they can gamble on their painter getting the right target of the two.

Of course, that's only a small possibility, and Waddle Derp is probably legit, but since the day seems to be 2 RL days long, I think we should definitely wait before making a decision to claim to WD.

[MECHDRAGON777]

Please don't make open suggestions on who the cop should check, you only help the Mafia painter by doing so.
Also, bear in mind that there's a 20% chance that PPX was the Hippie, so it'd make sense for the Mafia to claim first: if the actual Hippie is dead, they seem super trustworthy, while if he's still alive, they can gamble on their painter getting the right target of the two.

Of course, that's only a small possibility, and Waddle Derp is probably legit, but since the day seems to be 2 RL days long, I think we should definitely wait before making a decision to claim to WD.

Yeah, I can see that being a wise idea.

[Cedur]

I didn't claim to 100%ly assert that Spinda was guilty. It's just that I thought since the Mafia / Government can kill one town member every night and since they know their targets other than the Town, the Town should probably not waste a day to lynch someone, even if they have little clue and if they have the risk to decimate themselves. Anyway, I'm innocent. And jsyk I and Nuclear_Blaze know each other, I talked to him on Discord so he found the game.

Also I thought that I read somewhere that votes could be retracted (marked via bold green text). Without that I surely wouldn't have done that move this early, despite the above reasoning. I think it's also better to have a limit of votes (3 or 4) needed in the very first day phases to send someone to trial.

[Julia Pseudo]

^
Votes can't be retracted here - if you want to not vote for someone, you'll have to vote for someone else.

[MECHDRAGON777]

I didn't claim to 100%ly assert that Spinda was guilty. It's just that I thought since the Mafia / Government can kill one town member every night and since they know their targets other than the Town, the Town should probably not waste a day to lynch someone, even if they have little clue and if they have the risk to decimate themselves. Anyway, I'm innocent. And jsyk I and Nuclear_Blaze know each other, I talked to him on Discord so he found the game.

Also I thought that I read somewhere that votes could be retracted (marked via bold green text). Without that I surely wouldn't have done that move this early, despite the above reasoning. I think it's also better to have a limit of votes (3 or 4) needed in the very first day phases to send someone to trial.

The retracting of votes is something I only have seen on the Talkhaus actually...

[Ness-Wednesday]

I honestly think Nuclear_Blaze is more innocent than Supershroom, but then again there isn't really any proper evidence to think that yet.

[PixelPest]

Supershroom, if you had thoroughly read through the rules as you said you did, this probably wouldn't have happened. Also, it is never required for the Town to lynch someone. Often on the first few Nights where everyone has little intel, sometimes lynches are avoided to make sure that innocents aren't killed, because the less members of the Town there are, the closer the Mafia is to winning. I also agree with Ness-Wednesday although Nuclear_Blaze's most recent post doesn't really say the same thing at all as his other one. I'm not sure if both Supershroom is just dumb, but since someone has to be voted for now that Spinda has taken a vote, I say we just get him out of the running

[HeroOfRhyme]

Guys I would like to say I might be going inactive for a few days, my charger for my ipod broke and it died so after this tablet that im using dies then I dont know if I will be able to be on much or at all until I get a new one.

So yeh I may be inactive.

Before I go though I will vote to lynch Supershroom

[PixelPest]

Well, there's one vote for Supershroom, so here's another one:

Supershroom

[Nuclear_Blaze]

I'm going to place my vote on Spinda for reasons already stated earlier by someone else.

[TLtimelord]

This seems to happen quite often. A seemingly innocent bystander accuses Spinda of being mafia when he actually isn't and/or publicly trusts someone. Next thing we know they're fucked by the lovely bandwagon, because the bandwagon helps us just as many times as it fucks us.

SMBXorg mafia advice, Supershroom. If you do so much as breathe in Spinda's direction in the mafia thread, prepare to die via bandwagon. This is why I'm not voting. There's not an ounce of real evidence.

[HeroOfRhyme]

Unless you are me, I usually always find a way to go against him but it is just to early to vote anyone really. I voted supershroom out of safety because there is nothing to go on yet. I am just hoping he shows up yellow or red, or t the very least green.

[Cedur]

I'm not sure if both Supershroom is just dumb, but since someone has to be voted for now that Spinda has taken a vote, I say we just get him out of the running

Again, this misunderstanding was only because of that green text (replacement) that I saw in a previous Mafia game. Plus it's the kind-of-awkward mode that just one vote could kill off somebody if everyone else abstains. I'd strongly suggest to change this for the next game, so someone could voice a little suspicion but it doesn't have consequences if it stays insecure and people don't bandwagon. Besides, if I was Mafia, I'd have communicated voting strategies with the other Mafiosi first.

Of course under these circumstances I would feel sorry for Spinda if he was green or blue. But I claim to be green or blue as well. Dear fellow townies, I hope I've told enough why I'm innocent.

And yeah, right now the votes are a draw.

[PixelPest]

You could have easily communicated with the Mafia before you cast your vote, so really, the more you talk, the more suspicious you make yourself. It's your own fault that you assumed you can take back votes instead of reading the rules. Also Nuclear_Blaze, please state yourself why you are voting for Spinda, not just "someone else said my reasons earlier", because right now you also seem very suspicious

[PixelPest]

I really hate having to put a lynch vote on someone this early in the game, especially with such limited intel, but it seems necessary now due to what you've started Supershroom, over what seems to just be a misguided hunch