Super Mario Bros. X Forums

I wouldn't react that strongly to it - it's making you seem suspicious.

I'm not entirely sure I believe Nato, but if no one counterclaims then I'll trust him somewhat.

Jacob wrote:Who the hell would claim fucking doc day one?
What fucking logic must you have or goddamn (dragon) balls must you have to say this
Besides it is better to claim cop then fucking doc ad cop could be protected
So why should anyone believe you, are doc
NO ONE WOULD CLAIM DOC ON DAY ONE YOU ARE TRYING TO EITHER HURT TOWN OR GAMETHROW
THAT IS WHAT IT FEELS LIKE YOU ARE TRYING TO DO!

Calm down, buddy.

HenryRichard wrote:I wouldn't react that strongly to it - it's making you seem suspicious.

I'm not entirely sure I believe Nato, but if no one counterclaims then I'll trust him somewhat.

Are you referring to what Jacob said or what Nato said?

Jacob, tone it down. I don't want to see anymore posts like that from you because I've already warned you multiple times before.

However, we gotta keep in mind that Nato may just be baiting a claim from the actual Doc so they can take him down. If anything the Cop could inspect them so if he really is the doc they could possibly form an alliance with each other.

I may have forgotten the amount of people playing and the amount of people inactive are drastically different.

Looks like we'll go ahead with Spinda's plan then if I survive the night.

Yeah, I suppose that could work.

Kyo Saito wrote:Are you referring to what Jacob said or what Nato said?

Jacob - Nato just happened to post right before I did.

HenryRichard wrote:

Kyo Saito wrote:Are you referring to what Jacob said or what Nato said?

Jacob - Nato just happened to post right before I did.

Ah, I see.

I guess we do not have anyone to vote off today?

Kyo Saito wrote:I guess we do not have anyone to vote off today?

Not really.

HenryRichard wrote:I wouldn't react that strongly to it - it's making you seem suspicious.

I'm not entirely sure I believe Nato, but if no one counterclaims then I'll trust him somewhat.

It seems a bit suspicious to claim Doctor so early.

TheDinoKing432 wrote:

HenryRichard wrote:I wouldn't react that strongly to it - it's making you seem suspicious.

I'm not entirely sure I believe Nato, but if no one counterclaims then I'll trust him somewhat.

It seems a bit suspicious to claim Doctor so early.

It's not; it's rather tactical, actually.

With about two hours left, I really do not want someone ti be lycned by RNG like in 8flight's game. Do we need to vote? It i pretty messaes up if we start a vote on someone random and they turn up to be town. suspisions do rise, but who is rwally the suspisious one here? Nato is most suspisious, yet not really enough to lynch off. So, does anyone have a plan?

So, if it is tactical, who will take the bait? (Besides the inspector). Should we PM our roles to Nato? Or should we hope he survives the night?

TheDinoKing432 wrote:

HenryRichard wrote:I wouldn't react that strongly to it - it's making you seem suspicious.

I'm not entirely sure I believe Nato, but if no one counterclaims then I'll trust him somewhat.

It seems a bit suspicious to claim Doctor so early.

It isn't really suspicious to claim any role at any point in the game. The only thing that should rise suspicion is if two people claimed the same role at any point in the game.

Another thing some people need to understand is that you might find it suspicious while others may not find it suspicious. I would not address a majority as finding something suspicious unless everyone is agreeing that something is suspicious. If you say "I think X is suspicious" as opposed to "it is suspicious" then you are referring to yourself and not a majority. Just saying.

Kyo Saito wrote: It isn't really suspicious to claim any role at any point in the game. The only thing that should rise suspicion is if two people claimed the same role at any point in the game.

Another thing some people need to understand is that you might find it suspicious while others may not find it suspicious. I would not address a majority as finding something suspicious unless everyone is agreeing that something is suspicious. If you say "I think X is suspicious" as opposed to "it is suspicious" then you are referring to yourself and not a majority. Just saying.

I just found it a bit suspicious to claim so early. No need to be so pedantic.

Since there's no one too suspicious to lynch (except for probably Nato) and it's almost night phase, I'll vote safety .

TheDinoKing432 wrote:I'll vote safety .

What the hell ^^

PixelPest wrote:

TheDinoKing432 wrote:I'll vote safety .

What the hell ^^

You can vote "Nobody" but not "safety"

Lol, I meant I vote for no one, so I'll do a safety vote.

TheDinoKing432 wrote:Lol, I meant I vote for no one, so I'll do a safety vote.

That's not what a safety vote is

In that case, I might as well vote for Nato.